Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Promising Technique of Parameterization For Reconfigurable Radio, the Common Operators Technique: Fundamentals and Examples

  • Published:
Journal of Signal Processing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the field of Software Radio (SWR), parameterization studies have become a very important topic. This is mainly because parameterization will probably decrease the size of the software to be downloaded, and also because it will limit the reconfiguration time. In this paper, parameterization is considered as a digital radio design methodology. Two different techniques, namely common functions and common operators are considered. In this paper, the second view is developed and illustrated by two examples: the well known Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and the proposed Reconfigurable Linear Feedback Shift Register (R-LFSR), derived from the classical Linear Feedback Shift Register (LFSR) structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. GSM: Global System for Mobile Communications

  2. IS95: Interim Standard 95 (CDMA)

  3. PDC: Personal Digital Cellular

  4. DECT: Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications

  5. UMTS: Universal Mobile Telecommunication System

  6. LAN: Local Area Network (WiFi, WiMax, …)

  7. T-DMB: Terrestrial — Digital Multimedia Broadcasting

  8. DVB-T: Digital Video Broadcasting-Terrestrial

  9. PMR: Professional Mobile Radio

  10. GMSK : Gaussian Minimum Shift Keying

  11. QPSK : Quadrature Phase-Shift Keying

  12. FDMA : Frequency-division multiple access

  13. TDMA : Time-division multiple access

  14. DAMPS : Digital American Mobile Phone System

  15. FDD : Frequency-Division Duplex

  16. DS-CDMA : Direct Sequence Code Division Multiple Access

  17. PMR : Professional Mobile Radio

References

  1. Mitola, J. (1995). The software radio architecture. IEEE Communications Magazine, 33, 26–38. doi:10.1109/35.393001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tuttlebee, W. (1995). Evolution of radio systems into the 21st century. Bath, United-Kingdom: IEEE Radio receivers and associated systems.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Forum, S. D.R. Software Defined Radio Forum, http://www.sdrforum.org/.

  4. Rhiemeier, A. (2002). Benefits and limits of parameterized channel coding for software radio. 2nd Karlsruhe Workshop on Software Radios. Germany.

  5. Jondral, F. (2002). Parameterization-a technique for SDR Implementation. In W. Tuttlebee (ed.), Software Defined Radio Enabling Technologies (pp. 233–256) Wiley

  6. Palicot, J., & Roland, C. (2003). FFT: A basic function for a reconfigurable receiver. Papeete: ICT’ 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alaus, L., Noguet, D., & Palicot, J. (2008). A reconfigurable linear feedback shift register for software defined radio terminal. Santorin: ISWPC2008.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ghouwayel, A., Louët, Y., & Palicot, J. (2006). A reconfigurable butterfly architecture for fourier and fermat transforms. Karlsruhe: WSR’06.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moy, C., Palicot, J., Rodriguez, V., & Giri, D. (2006). Optimal determination of common operators for multi-standards software-defined radio. Karlsruhe, Germany: WSR’06.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rodriguez, V., Moy, C., & Palicot, J. (2007). Install or invoke?: The optimal tradeoff between performance and cost in the design of multi-standard reconfigurable radios. In Wiley InterScience. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Journal, 7(9), 1143–1156. doi:10.1002/wcm.487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tessier, R., & Burleston, W. (2001). Reconfigurable computing for digital signal processing: a survey. Journal of VLSI Signal Processing, 28, 7–27. doi:10.1023/A:1008155020711.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Klapper, A., & Goresky, M. (2002). Fibonacci and Galois representations of feedback-with-carry shift registers. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 48(11), 2826–2836.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Alaus, L., Palicot, J., & Noguet, D. (2008). Extended reconfigurable linear feedback shift register operators for SDR. Bologna: ISSSTA’08.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ferrara, E., Cowan, C., Grant, P. (1995). Frequency domain adaptive filtering. Prentice-Hall.

  15. Mansour, D., & Gray, A. (1982). Unconstrained frequency-domain adaptive filter. IEEE Transactions on Acoustic, Speech and Signal Processing, 30(5), 726–734.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Schirtzinger, T., Li, X., & Jenkins, W. (1995). A comparison of three algorithms for blind equalization based on the constant modulus error criterion. New York: ICASSP’95.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Berberidis, K., Palicot, J. (1995). A block Quasi-Newton Algorithm implemented in the frequency domain. EUSIPCO’96, Trieste, September.

  18. Berberidis, K., Palicot, J.: (1995). A frequency domain decision feedback equalizer for multipath echo cancellation. Globecom’95, Singapore.

  19. Berberidis, K., Marava, A., Karaivazoglou, P., & Palicot, J. (2001). Robust and Fast Converging decision feedback equalizer based on a new adaptive semi blind estimation algorithm. San Antonio: Globecom’01.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Alard, M., Lassalle, R. (1987). Principles of modulation and channel coding for digital broadcasting for mobile receivers. EBU Review, Technical N 224.

  21. Akansu, A., Duhamel, P., Lin, X., & Courville, M. (1998). Orthogonal transmultiplexers in communications: a review. IEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 46(4), 979–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hentschel, T. (2002). Channelization for software defined base-stations. Annals of Telecommunications, 57(5), 386–420.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Hentschel, T., Fettweis, G., & Bronzel, M. (1998). Channelization and sample rate adaptation in software radio terminals. Rhodes: ACTS Mobile Communications Summit.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Garcia, J., Gubolivic, Z., Diaz, F., Alonso, J., Macleod, J., Beach, M. (2000). TRUST approach to software defined radio: RF considerations. Summit’00, Galway, Ireland.

  25. Tuttlbee, W. (2001). Software defined radio: Enabling technology. Wiley.

  26. Zangi, K., & Koilpillai, D. (1999). Software radio issues in cellular base stations. IEEE Journal On Selected Areas in Communications, 17(4), 561–573. doi:10.1109/49.761036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Crochiere, R., Rabiner, L. (1983). Multirate digital signal processing. Prentice-Hall.

  28. Bailly, B., Bidet, E., Cardin, J., Djoko Kouam, M., Joanblanq, C., & Palicot, J. (1995). FDF a 512 FIR filter using a mixed temporal-frequential approach. Santa Clara: CICC’95.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tseng, B. (1989). Direct realization of the transpose structure for FIR and IIR Filters. Signals, Systems and Computers Twenty-Third Asilomar Conference.

  30. Proakis, J. (2007). Digital communications, McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

  31. ARIB STD-T63-25.212 V4.5.0, Multiplexing and channel coding, (FDD), (Release 4).

  32. IEEE Std 802.11b-1999/Cor 1-2001

  33. IEEE Std 802.11g-2003

  34. IEEE Std 802.16 - Part 16

  35. Leveiller, S. (2004). Quelques Algorithmes de Cryptanalyse du Registre Filtré. Thesis Report, Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications.

  36. Kitsos, P., Sklavos, N., Zewas, N., Koufopavlou, O. (2001). A reconfigurable linear feedback shift register (LFSR) for the bluethooth System. University of Patras.

  37. Siclet, C., Siohan, P., & Pinchon, D. (2002). Oversampled orthogonal and biorthogonal multicarrier modulations with perfect reconstruction. Santorini: DSP ’00.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Helard, M., Le Gouable, R., Helard, J., & Baudais, J. (2001). Multicarrier CDMA techniques for future wideband wireless networks. Annals of Telecommunications, 56(5), 260–274.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CEA-LETI, Minatec, 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054, Grenoble Cedex 9, France

    L. Alaus & D. Noguet

  2. SUPELEC, Avenue de la Boulaie CS 47601, 35576, Cesson-Sévigné Cedex, France

    J. Palicot & Y. Louët

  3. Université de Bretagne Sud, UEB, CNRS Lab-STICC, 56321, Lorient, France

    C. Roland

Authors
  1. L. Alaus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Palicot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Roland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Y. Louët
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. Noguet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Alaus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alaus, L., Palicot, J., Roland, C. et al. Promising Technique of Parameterization For Reconfigurable Radio, the Common Operators Technique: Fundamentals and Examples. J Sign Process Syst 62, 173–185 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-009-0353-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-009-0353-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation