Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing the Performance of NB-IoT, LTE Cat-M1, Sigfox, and LoRa for IoT End Devices Moving at High Speeds in the Air

  • Published:
Journal of Signal Processing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, NB-IoT, LTE Cat-M1, Sigfox, and LoRa have been proposed as promising Low-Power Wide Area Networks (LPWANs) technologies for Internet-of-Things (IoT) applications. These technologies are aimed for IoT applications such as smart meters that can tolerate long transmission delays and only need a narrow band to periodically transmit a small amount of data. Although the performances of these technologies have been studied or compared in the literature, most comparisons were conducted in non-mobile conditions. In this work, we used a drone flying at 70 km/hr along a 10 km motorway to act as a mobile IoT end device to do the performance measurements. In this paper, we report and compare the performances of these technologies in such high-speed mobile conditions in the air.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. https://www.sigfox.com/, last retrieved on December 1 2020.

  2. https://www.lora-alliance.org, last retrieved on December 1 2020.

  3. Sornin Semtech, N., & Yegin Actility, A. (2017). LoraWAN Specification v1.1 October 11.

  4. Rohde, D., & Schwarz, J. (2016). Narrowband internet of things Whitepaper. Available: https://www.rohde-schwarz.com/us/applications/narrowband-internet-of-things-application-note_56280-314242.html.

  5. 3GPP Low Power Wide Area Technologies White Paper, Available: https://www.gsma.com/iot/resources/3gpp-low-power-wide-area-technologies-white-paper/.

  6. http://www.weightless.org, last retrieved on December 1 2020.

  7. Wang, S.Y., Chang, J.E., Fan, H., & Sun, H.T. (2020). Performance Comparisons of NB-iot, LTE Cat-M1, Sigfox, and LoRa Moving at High Speeds in the Air, IEEE ISCC 2020 (IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications 2020), July 7 - July 10, Rennes, France.

  8. 3GPP Low Power Wide Area Technologies GSMA white paper.

  9. Reynders, B., & Pollin, S. (2016). Chirp Spread spectrum as a modulation technique for long range communication, IEEE SCVT 2016 (symposium on communications and vehicular technologies 2016), nov 22 Mons, Belgium.

  10. Sornin, N., & et al. (2015). LoraWAN™LoRa Alliance.

  11. White Paper: A Technical Overview of LoRa and LoRaWAN, LoRa Alliance, 2015.

  12. MQTT - Message Queuing Telemetry Transport, available: http://mqtt.org.

  13. Lavric, A., Petrariu, A.I., & Popa, V. (2019). Long Range SigFox communication protocol scalability analysis under large-scale, high-density conditions. IEEE Access, 7, 35816–35825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rashmi, S.S, Wei, Y., & Hwang, S.-H. (2017). A Survey on LPWA Technology: LoRa and NB-IoT, ICT Express 2017. Information & Communications Technology Express 2017, 3(1), 14–21. ISSN 2405-9595.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 3GPP TR 45.820 Cellular System Support for Ultra Low Complexity and Low Throughput Internet of Things.

  16. Rapeepat, R., Vejlgaard, B., Nitin, M., & Amitava, G. (2016). NB-iot system for M2M communication, IEEE WCNC 2016 (Wireless communications and networking conference 2016), Apr 3-6, Doha, Qatar.

  17. Mekki, K., Eddy, B., Frederic, C., & Fernand, M. (2019). A comparative study of LPWAN technologies for large-scale IoT Deployment, ICT Express 2019. Information & Communications Technology Express 2019, 5(1), 1–7. ISSN 2405-9595.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ikpehai, A., & et al. (2019). Low-power wide area network technologies for internet-of-things: A comparative review. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(2), 2225–2240. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2018.2883728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Krupka, L., Vojtech, L., & Neruda, M. (2016). The Issue of LPWAN Technology Coexistence in IoT Environment, 2016 17th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika (ME), Dec 7-9, Prague, Czech Republic.

  20. Lauridsen, M., Nguyen, H., Vejlgaard, B., Kovacs, I. Z., Mogensen, P., & Sorensen, M. (2017). Coverage Comparison of GPRS, NB-iot, LoRa, and SigFox in a 7800 km Area, IEEE VTC Spring 2017 (85th Vehicular Technology Conference 2017), Jun 4-7, Sydney, Australia.

  21. Passoja, M. (2017). NB-Iot and LTE Cat-M1 field measurements and SLA verification. Keysight Network Testing, November 20.

  22. Juha, P., & et al. (2017). Performance of a Low-Power Wide-Area network based on LoRa technology: Doppler Robustness, Scalability, and Coverage. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 13, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550147717699412.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gaelens, J, Van Torre, P, Verhaevert, J, & Rogier, H. (2017). Lora Mobile-To-Base-Station Channel Characterization in the Antarctic, Sensors (Basel).2017;(8):1903. Published Aug 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081903.

  24. Patel, D., & Won, M. (2017). Experimental Study on Low Power Wide Area Networks (LPWAN) for Mobile Internet of Things, IEEE VTC Spring 2017 (85th Vehicular Technology Conference 2017), Jun 4-7 Sydney, Australia.

  25. Mozaffari, M, Saad, W., Bennis, M., & Debbah, M. (2016). Efficient deployment of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles for optimal wireless coverage. IEEE Communications Letters, 20(8), 1647–1650. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2016.2578312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bor-Yaliniz, I., El-Keyi, A., & Yanikomeroglu, H. (2016). Efficient 3-D Placement of an aerial base station in next generation cellular networks, IEEE ICC 2016 (international conference on communications 2016), May 23-27, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

  27. https://www.amazon.ca/DFRobot-Built-in-Spring-GSM-Antenna/dp/B01C8AJB2C.

  28. https://partners.sigfox.com/products/mtduino-sfm2cww001.

  29. https://store.arduino.cc/usa/arduino-mkr-nb-1500.

  30. https://www.taoglas.com/product/barracuda-omb-915-b08f21/.

  31. STM32L0 series of ultra-low-power MCUs, Available: https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32l0-series.html.

  32. Mikhaylov, K., Petaejaejaervi, J., & Haenninen, T. (2016). Analysis of capacity and scalability of the LoRa Low power wide area network technology, 22th European Wireless Conference, May 18-20, Oulu, Finland.

  33. https://www.sigfox.com/en/coverage.

  34. Wang, S.-Y., Chang, J.-E., Fan, H., & Sun, Y.-H. Using Real-Life Network Applications to Remotely Manage NB-iot/cat-m1 Devices, The 7th IEEE World Forum on the Internet of Things, 20-24, June 2021, New Orleans, USA. (Submitted and under review).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Center for Open Intelligent Connectivity from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within the framework of the Higher Education Sprout Project by the Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan and the MOST project #109-2221-E-009-082.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shie-Yuan Wang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, SY., Chang, JE., Fan, H. et al. Comparing the Performance of NB-IoT, LTE Cat-M1, Sigfox, and LoRa for IoT End Devices Moving at High Speeds in the Air. J Sign Process Syst 94, 81–99 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-021-01660-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11265-021-01660-4

Keywords

Navigation