Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Zero-configuration indoor localization over IEEE 802.11 wireless infrastructure

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the technical advances in ubiquitous computing and wireless networking, there has been an increasing need to capture the context information (such as the location) and to figure it into applications. In this paper, we establish the theoretical base and develop a localization algorithm for building a zero-configuration and robust indoor localization and tracking system to support location-based network services and management. The localization algorithm takes as input the on-line measurements of received signal strengths (RSSs) between 802.11 APs and between a client and its neighboring APs, and estimates the location of the client. The on-line RSS measurements among 802.11 APs are used to capture (in real-time) the effects of RF multi-path fading, temperature and humidity variations, opening and closing of doors, furniture relocation, and human mobility on the RSS measurements, and to create, based on the truncated singular value decomposition (SVD) technique, a mapping between the RSS measure and the actual geographical distance. The proposed system requires zero-configuration because the on-line calibration of the effect of wireless physical characteristics on RSS measurement is automated and no on-site survey or initial training is required to bootstrap the system. It is also quite responsive to environmental dynamics, as the impacts of physical characteristics changes have been explicitly figured in the mapping between the RSS measures and the actual geographical distances. We have implemented the proposed system with inexpensive off-the-shelf Wi-Fi hardware and sensory functions of IEEE 802.11, and carried out a detailed empirical study in our departmental building, Siebel Center for Computer Science. The empirical results show the proposed system is quite robust and gives accurate localization results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The current 802.11 client interface has already made such measurements to locate and associate with the AP with the strongest beacon signal.

  2. Our algorithm does not rely on a specific propagation model for indoor environments. Instead, we exploit the characteristics that the signal strength is inversely proportional to the distance to the power of a path loss exponent for constructing the SDM.

  3. Gwon and Jain [15] has also proposed a lateration algorithm, called TIX, for computing the location of a client. We did not implement the TIX algorithm, but instead used the simple lateration algorithm given in Sect. 3.3.

  4. This requirement can be relaxed if the wireless client is responsible for measuring RSSs of beacon messages from neighboring APs.

  5. or in the case that the wireless monitors are responsible for measuring RSSs, the rate of which data packets are generated at a wireless client.

References

  1. Lim, H., Kung, L.-C., Hou, J. C., & Luo, H. (2006). Zero-configuration, robust indoor localization: Theory and experimentation. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.

  2. Goodstein, L. (2004). Location based service: Analysis of carrier spending, subscribers, devices and applications for handset-based and telematics services. Report form ABI research, http://www.abiresearch.com.

  3. Nogee, A. (2001). Ready or not, mobile location technology is here! Cahners In-Stat Group.

  4. Golmie, N. (2001). Interference in the 2.4 ghz band. In Proceedings of International Conference on Applications and Services in Wireless Networks (pp. 187–199).

  5. Ekahau positioning engine. http://www.ekahau.com/products/positioningengine.

  6. Castro, P., Chiu, P., Kremenek, T., & Muntz, R. (2001). A probabilistic room location service for wireless networked environments. In Proceedings of Ubiquitous Computing.

  7. Haeberlen, A., Flannery, E., Ladd, A. M., Rudys, A., Wallach, D. S., & Kavraki, L. E. (2004). Practical robust localization over large-scale 802.11 wireless networks. In Proceedings of ACM MOBICOM.

  8. Krishnan, P., Krishnakumar, A., Ju, W.-H., Mallows, C., & Ganu, S. (2004). A system for LEASE: Location estimation assisted by stationary emitters for indoor RF wireless networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.

  9. Ray, S., Ungrangsi, R., Pellegrini, F. D., Trachtenberg, A., & Starobinski, D. (2003). Robust location detection in emergency sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.

  10. Pinpoint. http://www.pinpoint.com.

  11. Ubisense. http://www.ubisense.net.

  12. Priyantha, N. B., Chakraborty, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). The cricket location-support system. In Proceedings of ACM MOBICOM.

  13. Bahl, P., & Padmanabhan, V. N. (2000). RADAR: An in-building rf-based user location and tracking system. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.

  14. Niculescu, D., & Nath, B. (2004). VOR base stations for indoor 802.11 positioning. In Proceedings of ACM MOBICOM.

  15. Gwon, Y., & Jain, R. (2004). Error characteristics and calibration-free techniques for wireless lan-based location estimation. In MobiWac ’04: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Mobility Management & Wireless Access Protocols (pp. 2–9). New York, NY, USA: ACM.

  16. Want, R., Hopper, A., Falcao, V., & Gibbons, J. (1992). The active badge location system. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 10(1), 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harter, A., Hopper, A., Steggles, P., Ward, A., & Webster, P. (1999). The anatomy of a context-aware application. In Proceedings of ACM MOBICOM.

  18. Priyantha, N. B., Miu, A. K., Balakrishnan, H., & Teller, S. (2001). The cricket compass for context-aware mobile applications. In Proceedings of ACM MOBICOM.

  19. Li, T., Ekpenyong, A., & Huang, Y.-F. (2004). A location system using asynchronous distributed sensors. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.

  20. Bahl, P., Padmanabhan, V. N., & Balachandran, A. (2000). Enhancements to the RADAR user location and tracking system. Microsoft Research, Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-2000-12.

  21. Youssef, M., & Agrawala, A. (2003). Small-scale compensation for WLAN location determination systems. In Proceedings of WCNC.

  22. Madigan, D., Elnahrawy, E., Martin, R. P., Ju, W.-H., Krishnan, P., & Krishnakumar, A. S. (2005) Bayesian indoor positioning systems. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.

  23. Ladd, A. M., Bekris, K. E., Rudys, A., Marceau, G., Kavraki, L. E., & Wallach, D. S. (2002). Robotics-based location sensing using wireless ethernet. In Proceedings of ACM MOBICOM.

  24. Tao, P., Rudys, A., Ladd, A. M., & Wallach, D. S. (2003). Wireless LAN location-sensing for security applications. In Proceedings of ACM Workshop on Wireless Security.

  25. Ganu, S., Krishnakumar, A. S., & Krishnan, P. (2004). Infrastructure-based location estimation in WLAN networks. In Proceedings of WCNC.

  26. Guvenc, I., Abdallah, C. T., Jordan, R., & Dedeoglu, O. (2003). Enhancements to RSS based indoor tracking systems using kalman filters. In Proceedings of International Signal Processing Conference and Global Signal Processing Expo.

  27. Niculescu, D., & Nath, B. (2004). Error characteristics of ad hoc positioning systems. In Proceedings of ACM MOBIHOC.

  28. Krishnakumar, A. S., & Krishnan, P. (2005). On the accuracy of signal strength-based location estimation techniques. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.

  29. Niculescu, D., & Nath, B. (2001). Ad hoc positioning system. In Proceedings of IEEE Globecom.

  30. Nagpal, R., Shrobe, H., & Bachrach, J. (2003). Organizing a global coordinate system from local information on an ad hoc sensor network. In Proceedings of IPSN.

  31. Savvides, A., Han, C.-C., & Strivastava, M. B. (2001). Dynamic fine-grained localization in ad-hoc networks of sensors. In Proceedings of ACM MOBICOM.

  32. Savvides, A., Park, H., & Srivastava, M. B. (2002). The bits and flops of the N-hop multilateration primitive for node localization problems. In Proceedings of ACM WSNA.

  33. Savarese, C., Rabaey, J., & Langendoen, K. (2002). Robust positioning algorithms for distributed ad-hoc wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of USENIX Annual Technical Conference.

  34. Raykar, V. C., Kozintsev, I., & Lienhart, R. (2003). Position calibration of audio sensors and actuators in a distributed computing platform. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia.

  35. Shang, Y., Ruml, W., & Zhang, Y. (2003). Localization from mere connectivity. In Proceedings of ACM MOBIHOC.

  36. Lim, H., & Hou, J. C. (2005). Localization for anisotropic sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.

  37. Bulusu, N., Heidemann, J., & Estrin, D. (2000). GPS-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Personal Communications, Special Issue on Smart Spaces and Environments, 7(5), 28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Doherty, L., Pister, K. S. J., & Ghaoui, L. E. (2001). Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.

  39. He, T., Huang, C., Blum, B. M., Stankovic, J. A., & Abdelzaher, T. (2003). Range-free localization schemes for large scale sensor networks. In Proceedings of ACM MOBICOM.

  40. Kismet. http://www.kismetwireless.ne.

  41. Hjaltason, G. R. & Samet, H. (2003). Properties of embedding methods for similarity searching in metric spaces. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and machine intelligence, 25(5), 530–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lim, H., Hou, J. C., & Choi, C.-H. (2005). Constructing Internet coordinate system based on delay measurement. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 13(3), 513–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tang, L., & Crovella, M. (2003). Virtual landmarks for the Internet. In Proceedings of ACM Internet Measurement Conference.

  44. Rappaport, T. S. (1996). Wireless communications priciples & practice. Prentice Hall, 1996.

  45. Gencer, N. G., & Williamson, S. J. (1998). Differential characterization of neural sources with the bimodal truncated SVD pseudo-inverse for EEG and MEG measurements. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 45(7), 827–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Haykin, S. (1996). Adaptive filter theory. Prentice Hall.

  47. Krishnakumar, A. S., & Krishnan, P. (2005). On the accuracy of signal strength-based location estimation techniques. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.

  48. Zhang, H., & Hou, J. C. (2005). Maintaining sensing coverage and connectivity in large sensor networks. Wireless Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks: An International Journal, 14, 28.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Linksys WRT54G wireless-G broadband router souce codes. http://www.linksys.com/support/gpl.as.

  50. Elnahrawy, E., Li, X., & Martin, R. (2004). The limits of localization using signal strength: A comparative study. In Proceedings of IEEE SECON.

  51. Ray, S., Lai, W., & Paschalidis, I. (2005). Deployment optimization of sensornet-based stochastic location-detection systems. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM.

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the basic research project through a grant provided by the Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology in 2007.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyuk Lim.

Additional information

A preliminary version of this paper appeared in IEEE INFOCOM 2006, Barcelona, Spain, April 2006 [1].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lim, H., Kung, LC., Hou, J.C. et al. Zero-configuration indoor localization over IEEE 802.11 wireless infrastructure. Wireless Netw 16, 405–420 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-008-0140-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-008-0140-3

Keywords

Navigation