Abstract
Cooperative spectrum sensing has been shown to be an effective approach to improve the detection performance by exploiting the spatial diversity among multiple cognitive nodes. By using the amplify-and-forward relaying with partial relay selection, this paper proposes a novel cooperative spectrum sensing scheme, which provides higher detection performance and is interesting in distributed cognitive radio networks. In the proposed sensing scheme, the “best” cognitive relay by means of partial relay selection technique amplifies and forwards the signals transmitted from the primary user (PU) to the cognitive user (CU). Then the CU detects PU’s states (i.e., presence or absence) via an energy detector. Moreover, the average missed-detection probability of proposed sensing scheme is studied over Nakagami-m fading channels, where m is a positive integer. In particular, the tight closed-form lower bounds of the average missed-detection probability are presented for the convenience of performance evaluation in practice. Finally, numerical results are provided to validate the derived closed-form lower bounds and the influence of the number of cognitive relays on the detection performance is also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Federal Communications Commission. (2002). Spectrum policy task force report, FCC 02-155. November 2002.
Broderson, R. W., Wolisz, A., Cabric, D., Mishra, S. M., & Willkomm, D. (2004). CORVUS: A cognitive radio approach for usage of virtual unlicensed spectrum. Berkeley, CA: University of California Berkeley Whitepaper.
Erpek, T., Lofquist, M., & Patton, K. (2007). Spectrum occupancy measurements: Loring Commerce Centre, Limestone, ME, Sept. 18–20, 2007. Shared Spectrum Co. report. Shared Spectrum Co., Vienna, VA.
Mitola, J., & Maguire, G. Q. (1999). Cognitive radios: Making software radios more personal. IEEE Personal Communications, 6(4), 13–18.
Haykin, S. (2005). Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23(2), 201–220.
Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, W.-Y., Vuran, M. C., & Mohanty, S. (2006). Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 50(13), 2127–2159.
Mishra, S. M., Sahai, A., & Brodersen, R. W. (2006). Cooperative sensing among cognitive radios. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on communications, (pp. 1658–1663). Istanbul, Turkey.
Zou, Y., Yao, Y.-D., & Zheng, B. (2012). Cooperative relay techniques for cognitive radio systems: Spectrum sensing and secondary user transmissions. IEEE Communications Magazine, 50(4), 98–103.
Wang, Z., Qu, D., & Jiang, T. (2013). Novel adaptive collaboration sensing for efficient acquisition of spectrum opportunities in cognitive radio networks. Wireless Networks, 19(2), 247–258.
Chen, C.-Y., Chou, Y.-H., Chao, H.-C., & Lo, C.-H. (2012). Secure centralized spectrum sensing for cognitive radio networks. Wireless Networks, 18(6), 667–677.
Ganesan, G., & Li, Y. (2007). Cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio, part I: Two user networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6(6), 2204–2213.
Ganesan, G., & Li, Y. (2007). Cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio, part II: Multiuser networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6(6), 2214–2222.
Atapattu, S., Tellambura, C., & Jiang, H. (2009). Relay based cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of IEEE global telecommunications conference, GLOBECOM, (pp. 1–5). Honolulu, HI.
Zou, Y.-L., Yao, Y.-D., & Zheng, B.-Y. (2011). A selective-relay based cooperative spectrum sensing scheme without dedicated reporting channels in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(4), 1188–1198.
Laneman, J. N., Tse, D. N. C., & Wornell, G. W. (2004). Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: efficient protocols and outage behavior. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 50(12), 3062–3080.
Kim, J.-B., & Kim, D. (2009). Comparison of tightly power-constrained performances for opportunistic amplify-and-forward relaying with partial or full channel information. IEEE Communications Letters, 13(2), 100–102.
Krikidis, I., Thompson, J., McLaughlin, S., & Goertz, N. (2008). Amplify-and-forward with partial relay selection. IEEE Communications Letters, 12(4), 235–237.
Gharanjik, A., & Mohamed-pour, K. (2011). Switch-and-stay partial relay selection over Rayleigh fading channels. IET Communications, 5(9), 1199–1203.
Fredj, K. B., & Aissa, S. (2012). Performance of amplify-and-forward systems with partial relay selection under spectrum-sharing constraints. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 11(2), 500–504.
Gradshteyn, I. S., & Ryzhik, I. M. (2007). Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (7th ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Digham, F. F., Alouini, M.-S., & Simon, M. K. (2007). On the energy detection of unknown signals over fading channels. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 55(1), 21–24.
Nuttall, A. H. (1975). Some integrals involving the Q M function. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 21(1), 95–96.
Simon, M. K., & Alouini, M.-S. (2005). Digital communication over fading channels (2nd ed.). London: Wiley.
Senaratne, D., & Tellambura, C. (2010). Unified exact performance analysis of two-hop amplify-and-forward relaying in Nakagami fading. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(3), 1529–1534.
Ren, D.-F., Ge, J.-H., & Li, J. (2013). Secondary user selection scheme using adaptive genetic algorithms for cooperative spectrum sensing under correlated shadowing. Wireless Personal Communications, 71(1), 769–788.
Shi, Z., Beard, C., & Mitchell, K. (2012). Competition, cooperation, and optimization in multi-hop CSMA networks with correlated traffic. International Journal of Next-Generation Computing, 3(3), 228–246.
Amarasuriya, G., Ardakani, M., & Tellambura, C. (2010). Output-threshold multiple-relay-selection scheme for cooperative wireless networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(6), 3091–3097.
Yang, Y., Ge, J.-H., & Gao, Y. (2011). Power allocation for two-way opportunistic amplify-and-forward relaying over Nakagami-m channels. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 10(7), 2063–2068.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China under Grant 2012CB316100, the Innovation Fund of Aerospace under Grant HTCXJJKT-11, the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 61101144, the “111” Project under Grant B08038, and the Nantong Application Research and Technology Program under Grant BK2011017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Proof of Lemma 1
In order to derive the PDF of γ r = γ P,r γ C,r /(γ P,r + γ C,r + 1), we first find the PDF of γ P,r and the CDF of γ C,r . By recalling the definition of γ P,r , its PDF over Nakagami-m fading channels can be given by [23, Eq. (2.21)]
where \(\Upgamma(\cdot)\) is the gamma function [20, Eq. (8.310.1)], and \(\Upgamma(m)=(m-1)!\) for \({m\in \mathbb{Z}^+}\). Owing to the “best” cognitive relay \(r = \arg {\mathop{\max}\limits_{k\in \{1,2,\dots,K\}}} \{\gamma_{C,k}\}\), the CDF of γ C,r over independent and identically distributed Nakagami-m fading channels can be calculated as
When m 2 > 1 and \({m_2 \in \mathbb{Z}^+}\), by making use of the binomial theorem, we have
Hence, by substituting (20) into (19), we obtain the CDF of γ C,r as follows
From (18) and (21), we can derive the CDF of γ r as
Let u = x − γ. \(\varDelta\) in (22) can be written as
With the aid of the binomial theorem, (23) can be rewritten as
Then, making use of [20, Eq. (3.471.9), 24], the integral term in (24) can be written in closed form as follows:
where \(K_v(\cdot)\) is the vth order modified Bessel function of the second kind.
By substituting (24), (25) into (22), we arrive at the CDF of γ r , which can be expressed as
in which \(\varDelta\) is given by
where m 2 > 1 and \({m_1, m_2 \in \mathbb{Z}^+}\).
Then, by taking the derivative of (26) with respect to γ, the closed-form PDF expression of γ r over Nakagami-m fading channels is derived as shown in Lemma 1. The proof is completed.
Appendix 2: Proof of Lemma 2
Owing to X = min(γ P,r , γ C,r ), the CDF of X is calculated as
where \(F_{\gamma_{P,r}}(x) = 1- e^{-\frac{m_1}{\upsilon}x} \sum_{k=0}^{m_1 -1} \frac{1}{k!} {\left(\frac{m_1}{\upsilon} x\right)}^k\), and \(F_{\gamma_{C,r}}(x)\) is given in (21). Hence, the PDF of X can be derived by taking the derivative of F X (x) with respect to x, and the lemma is proved.
Appendix 3: Proof of Theorem 1
By substituting (13) into (12), we have
Let \(\sqrt{2\gamma} = t, \Upphi_1\) in (28) can be written as
With the help of [22, Eq. (9)], the integral term in (29) can be calculated in closed form as follows:
where \(\varepsilon_{i_1} = \left\{{\begin{array}{ll} 1,& i_1 <\left({\sum_{b=1}^{m_2 -1}a_b}\right) +k\\ 1+\frac{a_0 m_2 \upsilon + m_1 \omega}{\upsilon\omega}, & i_1 = \left({\sum_{b=1}^{m_2 -1}a_b}\right) +k \end{array}}\right.\), and \(L_k(\cdot)\) denotes the Laguerre polynomial.
Substituting (30) into (29) yields the closed-form expression of \(\Upphi_1\). Similarly, we can obtain closed-form expressions of \(\Upphi_2\) and \(\Upphi_3\). By substituting \(\Upphi_1, \Upphi_2\) and \(\Upphi_3\) into (28), we get the closed-form lower bound of \(\bar{P}_{m,Nak}\) as shown in Theorem 1. The proof is completed.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ren, D., Ge, J. & Li, J. Cooperative spectrum sensing using amplify-and-forward relaying with partial relay selection in cognitive radio networks. Wireless Netw 20, 861–870 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-013-0646-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-013-0646-1