Skip to main content
Log in

Videocent: a quality-oriented incentive mechanism for video delivery in opportunistic networks

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, more and more people begin to focus on data delivery through opportunistic contacts among mobile users. In most cases, the data that we expect to share with others are videos, such as popular music videos and funny films. Because the video delivery will consume numerous resources of devices, few people will provide such service for others without any benefit. Thus, this paper centers on the incentive mechanism design for video delivery in opportunistic networks. Although several incentive schemes for such kind of networks have been proposed, however, they all mainly focus on the encouragement of general data forwarding, and almost none of them aims to stimulate nodes to realize the performance objective of networks. In this paper, we propose Videocent, a novel quality-oriented incentive mechanism for video delivery, which takes the characteristics of video data into account and formulates the video delivery among nodes as a game. This mechanism could not only encourage nodes to participate in the video delivery but also stimulate them to follow the defined rules to optimize the video delivery quality of whole networks. Its performance is validated through extensive simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This set of data is selected from our simulation results based on synthetic mobility trace (TTL equals to 300s). DSVM and Drop head are two buffer management policies, and the difference between them is that the former can optimize the buffer management according to the characteristics of video data and the latter has no such function.

  2. The meaning of “seen” is that a node received a replica of this packet at one time regardless of whether it still has this replica or has already removed it from its buffer.

References

  1. Liu, Y., Xiong, N., Zhao, Y., Vasilakos, A. V., Gao, J., & Jia, Y. (2010). Multi-layer clustering routing algorithm for wireless vehicular sensor networks. IET Communications, 4(7), 810–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou, L., Zhang, Y., Song, K., Jing, W., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2011). Distributed media services in P2P-based vehicular networks. IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technology, 60(2), 692–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shen, Z., Luo, J., Zimmermann, R., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2011). Peer-to-peer media streaming: Insights and new developments. Proceedings of the IEEE, 99(12), 2089–2109.

  4. Spyropoulos, T., Rais, R. N. B., Turletti, T., Obraczka, K., & Vasilakos, A. V. (2010). Routing for disruption tolerant networks: Taxonomy and design. Wireless Networks, 16(8), 2349–2370.

  5. Zeng, Yuanyuan, Xiang, Kai, Li, Deshi, & Vasilakos, Athanasios V. (2013). Directional routing and scheduling for green vehicular delay tolerant networks. Wireless Networks, 19(2), 161–173.

  6. Chaintreau, A., Hui, P., Crowcroft, J., Diot, C., Gass, R., & Scott, J. (2007). Impact of human mobility on opportunistic forwarding algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 6(6), 606–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Motani, M., Srinivasan, V., & Nuggehalli, P. S. (2005). Peoplenet: Engineering a wireless virtual social network. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom 2005.

  8. Balasubramanian, A., Levine, B., & Venkataramani, A. (2007). DTN routing as a resource allocation problem. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 37(4), 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burgess, J., Gallagher, B., Jensen, D. & Levine, B. N. (2006). Maxprop: Routing for vehicle-based disruption-tolerant networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2006.

  10. Wang, Y., Nakao, A., Vasilakos, A. V., & Ma, J. (2011). P2P soft security: On evolutionary dynamics of P2P incentive mechanism. Computer Communications, 34(3), 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jaramillo,J. J., & Srikant, R. (2007). DARWIN: Distributed and adaptive reputation mechanism for wireless ad-hoc networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom 2007.

  12. Marti, S., Giuli, T. J., Lai, K., Baker, M., et al. (2000). Mitigating routing misbehavior in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom 2000.

  13. Milan, F., Jaramillo, J. J., & Srikant, R. (2006). Achieving cooperation in multihop wireless networks of selfish nodes. In Proceedings of ACM workshop on GameNets 2006.

  14. Qiu, L., Yang, Y. R., Zhang, Y., & Shenker, S. (2003). On selfish routing in internet-like environments. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2003.

  15. Srinivasan, V., Nuggehalli, P., Chiasserini, C.-F., & Rao, R. R. (2003). Cooperation in wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2003.

  16. Chen, B. B., & Chan, M. C. (2010). Mobicent: A credit-based incentive system for disruption tolerant network. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2010.

  17. Shevade, U.,Song, H. H., Qiu, L., & Zhang, Y. (2008). Incentive-aware routing in DTNs. In Proceedings of IEEE ICNP 2008.

  18. Rongxing, L., Lin, X., Zhu, H., Shen, X., & Preiss, B. (2010). Pi: A practical incentive protocol for delay tolerant networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 9(4), 1483–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu, H., Lin, X., Rongxing, L., Fan, Y., & Shen, X. (2009). Smart: A secure multilayer credit-based incentive scheme for delay-tolerant networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 58(8), 4628–4639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Richardson, I. E. (2004). H. 264 and MPEG-4 video compression: Video coding for next-generation multimedia. Wiley.com.

  21. Buchegger, S., & Le Boudec, J.-Y. (2002). Performance analysis of the CONFIDANT protocol. In Proceedings of ACM MobiHoc 2002.

  22. Balakrishnan, K., Deng, J., & Varshney, V. K. (2005). TWOACK: Preventing selfishness in mobile ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE WCNC 2005.

  23. Buttyán, L., & Hubaux, J.-P. (2000). Enforcing service availability in mobile ad-hoc WANs. In Proceedings of ACM MobiHoc 2000.

  24. Zhang, Y., Lou, W., Liu, W., & Fang, Y. (2007). A secure incentive protocol for mobile ad hoc networks. Wireless Networks, 13(5), 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen, K., & Nahrstedt, K. (2004). iPass: An incentive compatible auction scheme to enable packet forwarding service in MANET. In Proceedings of IEEE ICDCS 2004.

  26. Mahmoud, M. E., & Shen, X. (2010). Stimulating cooperation in multi-hop wireless networks using cheating detection system. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2010.

  27. Zhong, S., Li, L. E., Liu, Y. G., & Yang, Y. R. (2007). On designing incentive-compatible routing and forwarding protocols in wireless ad-hoc networks. Wireless Networks, 13(6), 799–816.

  28. Xie, X., Chen, H., & Hongyi, W. (2009). Bargain-based stimulation mechanism for selfish mobile nodes in participatory sensing network. In Proceedings of IEEE SECON 2009.

  29. Mei, A., & Stefa, J. (2012). Give2get: Forwarding in social mobile wireless networks of selfish individuals. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 9(4), 569–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ning, T., Yang, Z., Xie, X., & Hongyi, W. (2011). Incentive-aware data dissemination in delay-tolerant mobile networks. In Proceedings of IEEE SECON 2011.

  31. Chen, K., & Shen, H. (2013). Multicent: A multifunctional incentive scheme adaptive to diverse performance objectives for DTN routing. In Proceedings of IEEE SECON 2013.

  32. Wu, H., & Ma, H. (2013). DSVM: A buffer management strategy for video transmission in opportunistic networks. In Proceedings of IEEE ICC 2013.

  33. Gao, W., Li, Q., Zhao, B., & Cao, G. (2009). Multicasting in delay tolerant networks: A social network perspective. In Proceedings of ACM MobiHoc 2009.

  34. Conan, V., Leguay, J., & Friedman, T. (2007). Characterizing pairwise inter-contact patterns in delay tolerant networks. In Proceedings of ACM Autonomics 2007.

  35. Ziviani, A., Wolfinger, B. E., De Rezende, J. F., & Duarte, O. C. M., & Fdida, S. (2005). Joint adoption of QoS schemes for MPEG streams. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 26(1), 59–80.

  36. Fudenberg, D., & Tirole, J. (2005). Game theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  37. [dataset] kaist/wibro(v.2008-06-04). http://crawdad.cs.dartmouth.edu.

  38. myEvalvid. http://140.116.164.80/smallko/ns2/myevalvid2.htm.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research reported in this paper is supported by the National Natural Science Fund of China under Grant No.61133015, 61332005; the Funds for Creative Research Groups of China under Grant No.61121001; the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China under Grant No.20120005130002; the Key Technologies R&D Program of China under Grant No.2013BAK01B02; the Cosponsored Project of Beijing Committee of Education.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huadong Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wu, H., Ma, H. & Zhao, D. Videocent: a quality-oriented incentive mechanism for video delivery in opportunistic networks. Wireless Netw 21, 769–781 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-014-0813-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-014-0813-z

Keywords

Navigation