Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Hybrid energy efficient static routing protocol for homogeneous and heterogeneous large scale WSN

  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless sensor networks consist of a large number of nodes deployed randomly in an area of interest. Theses nodes have sensing, computation, and wireless communications capabilities. In another hand nodes have energy constraints since they are equipped by non-rechargeable batteries. To handle this issue, routing protocols consist of designing the network in order to collect and transmit data with less energy consumption. In this paper we presented a new Hybrid Energy Efficient Static routing protocol (HEESR), combining between clustering and multi-hop routing techniques. HEESR is dividing the network into several levels. For each round, it creates clusters, route the collected data through gateways called Independent Nodes, elected using a new dynamic approach and introduces Dormant nodes. Finally, the proposed HEESR have improved network’s life time, throughput and other compared metrics, in both homogeneous and heterogeneous networks, and prolonged network’s stability zone up to 98.4% compared to LEACH, 98% compared to DEEC and up to 40.5% compared to SMR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rodrigues, P., & John, J. (2020). Joint trust: An approach for trust-aware routing in WSN. Wireless Networks,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02271-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan, L., Gomez Chavez, K., Rudolph, H., et al. (2020). Hierarchical routing protocols for wireless sensor network: A compressive survey. Wireless Networks,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02260-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gungor, V. C., Lu, B., & Hancke, G. P. (2010). Opportunities and challenges of wireless sensor networks in smart grid. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 57(10), 3557–3564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Abdelhadi, E. H., Aicha, S., & Abdelmajid, B. (2019). Assessment of a proactive routing protocol RPL in Ipv6 based wireless sensor networks. In Third international conference on intelligent computing in data sciences (ICDS), Marrakech, Morocco (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDS47004.2019.8942364.

  5. Al-Karaki, J. N., & Kamal, A. E. (2004). Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Wireless Communications, 11(6), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/MWC.2004.1368893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Alnawafa, E., & Marghescu, I. (2018). New energy efficient multi-hop routing techniques for wireless sensor networks: Static and dynamic techniques. Sensors Journal, Basel,. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Alnawafa, E., & Marghescu, I. (2017). EDMHT-LEACH: Enhancing the performance of the DMHT-LEACH protocol for wireless sensor networks. In 16th RoEduNet conference: Networking in education and research (RoEduNet) (pp. 1–6). Targu Mures.

  8. Kumari, C. U., & Padma, T. (2019). Energy-efficient routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. In Soft Computing and Signal Processing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 898). Springer, Singapore.

  9. Qing, L., Zhu, Q., & Wang, M. (2006). Design of a distributed energy-efficient clustering algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 29, 2230–2237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Maui, HI, USA (Vol. 2, p. 10). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2000.926982.

  11. Ali, M., Dey, T., & Biswas, R. (2008). ALEACH: Advanced LEACH routing protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In IEEE conference on electrical and computer engineering (pp. 909–914).

  12. Mehta, R., Pandey, A., & Kapadia, P. (2012). Reforming clusters using C-LEACH in wireless sensor networks. In International conference on computer communication and informatics (pp. 1–4).

  13. Azim, A., & Islam, M. (2009). Hybrid LEACH: A relay node based low energy adaptive clustering hierarchy for wireless sensor networks. In IEEE conference on communications (pp. 911–916).

  14. Younis, O., & Fahmy, S. (2004). HEED: A hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 3(4), 366–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yan, J., Zhou, M., & Ding, Z. (2016). Recent advances in energy-efficient routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: A review. IEEE Access, 4, 5673–5686. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2598719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindsey, S., & Raghavendra, C. S. (2002). PEGASIS: Power-efficient gathering in sensor information systems. In Proceedings, IEEE aerospace conference, Big Sky, MT, USA (p. 3).

  17. Smaragdakis, G., Matta, I., & Bestavros, A. (2004). SEP: A stable election protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In Second international workshop on sensor and actor network protocols and applications (SANPA 2004).

  18. Alnawafa, E., & Marghescu, I. (2016). MHT: Multi-hop technique for the improvement of leach protocol. In 15th RoEduNet conference: Networking in Education and Research, Bucharest (pp. 1–5).

  19. Heinzelman, W., Chandrakasan, A., & Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless micro sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 1(4), 660–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao, Z., Xu, K., Hui, G., & Hu, L. (2018). An energy-efficient clustering routing protocol for wireless sensor networks based on AGNES with balanced energy consumption optimization. Sensors (Basel), 18(11), 3938. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Selvakennedy, S. & Sinnappan, S. (2005). A configurable time-controlled clustering algorithm for wireless sensor networks. In 11th International conference on parallel and distributed systems (ICPADS’05), Fukuoka (pp. 368–372).

  22. Mouhou, A., Badri, A., Ballouk, A., & Sayouti, Y. (2017). Genetic algorithms optimization of tuning parameters of generalized predictive control. In International conference on electrical and information technologies (ICEIT) (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1109/EITech.2017.8255281.

  23. Bouyghf, H., Benhala, B., Raihani, A., Pereira, P., & Sallem, A. (2017). Optimal design of RF CMOS circuits by means of an artificial bee colony technique. In Focus on swarm intelligence research and applications (pp. 221–246). NOVA Science Publishers.

Download references

Funding

Funding was provided by "CNRST, Morocco".

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. EEA&TI Laboratory Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, Hassan II University of Casablanca, BP 146, 20650, Mohammedia, Morocco

    Hicham Qabouche, Aïcha Sahel & Abdelmajid Badri

Authors
  1. Hicham Qabouche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aïcha Sahel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abdelmajid Badri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hicham Qabouche.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qabouche, H., Sahel, A. & Badri, A. Hybrid energy efficient static routing protocol for homogeneous and heterogeneous large scale WSN. Wireless Netw 27, 575–587 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02473-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02473-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation