Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Spectrum selection and decision using neural and fuzzy optimization approaches

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Wireless Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

In Cognitive Radio Network, after sensing process, the selection and decision for a reliable channel from the list of free channels is important for assignment to Cognitive Users (CUs) for communication with Quality of Service (QoS). In this paper a consistent spectrum selection and decision scheme with two-fold neural network has been proposed for selection and decision process and its performance is compared with the schemes of Genetic algorithm and Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN). BPNN- Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is a two-fold spectrum selection and decision approach which combines both BPNN and ANFIS techniques. A channel with the required QoS is selected based on the parameters such as Primary User (PU) states, signal strength, spectrum demand, velocity and distance. The simulation analysis shows that the BPNN–ANFIS technique reduces probability of blocking and dropping and therefore the accuracy of reliable channel selection obtained for the CUs use is more than 92%. The blocking probability of the proposed technique ranges from 1 to 3% which is much lower than the Genetic Algorithm (9–50%) and BPNN (8–40%). The maximum dropping probability of the proposed technique is only 4% and this is lower compared to 20% dropping in the other two techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmadfard, A., Jamshidi, A., & Keshavarz-Haddad, A. (2017). Probabilistic spectrum sensing data falsification attack in cognitive radio networks. Signal Processing, 137, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bradonjić, M., & Lazos, L. (2012). Graph-based criteria for spectrum-aware clustering in cognitive radio networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 10(1), 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tahir, M., Habaebi, M. H., & Islam, M. R. (2017). Novel distributed algorithm for coalition formation for enhanced spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 77, 139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kieu-Xuan, T., & Koo, I. (2013). A cooperative spectrum sensing scheme using adaptive fuzzy system for cognitive radio networks. Information Sciences, 220, 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kapoor, G., & Rajawat, K. (2015). Outlier-aware cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. Physical Communication, 17, 118–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haghighat, M., & Sadough, S. M. S. (2014). Cooperative spectrum sensing for cognitive radio networks in the presence of smart malicious users. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 68(6), 520–527.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paul, A., & Maity, S. P. (2016). Kernel fuzzy c-means clustering on energy detection based cooperative spectrum sensing. Digital Communications and Networks, 2(4), 196–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. So, J., & Kwon, T. (2016). Limited reporting-based cooperative spectrum sensing for multiband cognitive radio networks. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications, 70(4), 386–397.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maity, S. P., Chatterjee, S., & Acharya, T. (2016). On optimal fuzzy c-means clustering for energy efficient cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. Digital Signal Processing, 49, 104–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiao, C. H., Wang, K. R., & Shuo, M. E. N. (2011). Cooperative blind spectrum sensing using autocorrelation matrix. The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, 18(3), 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang, D., Wang, Y., Yao, C., & Han, Y. (2015). An effective dynamic spectrum access algorithm for multi-hop cognitive wireless networks. Computer Networks, 84, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Roy, S. D., Kundu, S., Ferrari, G., & Raheli, R. (2013). On spectrum sensing in cognitive radio CDMA networks with beam forming. Physical Communication, 9, 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Suguna, R., & Rathinasabapathy, V. (2019). An SoC architecture for energy detection based spectrum sensing using low latency column bit compressed (LLCBC) MAC in cognitive radio wireless sensor networks. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 69, 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Anand, S., & Chandramouli, R. (2010). A network flow based approach for network selection in dynamic spectrum access networks. Information processing letters, 110(3), 104–107.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Khalunezhad, A., Moghim, N., & Ghahfarokhi, B. S. (2018). Trust-based multi-hop cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. Journal of information security and applications, 42, 29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, C., Fu, Y., Zhang, Y., Yu, R., & Liu, Y. (2014). An efficient hybrid spectrum access algorithm in OFDM-based wideband cognitive radio networks. Neuro computing, 125, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Maksoud, I. A., Rabia, S. I., & Algundi, M. A. (2017). A discrete- time multi-server queueing model for opportunistic spectrum access systems. Performance Evaluation, 109, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, W., & Yeo, C. K. (2012). Joint iterative algorithm for optimal cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. Computer Communications, 36(1), 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Monteiro, A., Souto, E., Pazzi, R., & Nogueira, M. (2019). Context-aware network selection in heterogeneous wireless networks. Computer Communications, 135, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Althunibat, S., Di Renzo, M., & Granelli, F. (2014). Cooperative spectrum sensing for cognitive radio networks under limited time constraints. Computer Communications, 43, 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rasheed, T., Rashdi, A., & Akhtar, A. N. (2018). Cooperative spectrum sensing using fuzzy logic for cognitive radio network. In 2018 advances in science and engineering technology international conferences (ASET). IEEE, pp. 1–6.

  22. Zhiqiang, L., Taifu, L., Peng, C., & Shilun, Z. (2018). A multi-objective robust optimization scheme for reducing optimization performance deterioration caused by fluctuation of decision parameters in chemical processes. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 119, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xue, X. (2017). Prediction of daily diffuse solar radiation using artificial neural networks. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(47), 28214–28221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rajaguru, R., & Vimaladevi, K. (2016). Performance analysis of radio access techniques in self-configured next generation wireless networks. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 10(10 SE), 232–242.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rajaguru, R., Devi, K. V., & Marichamy, P. (2020). A hybrid spectrum sensing approach to select suitable spectrum band for cognitive users. Computer Networks, 180, 107387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lou, H., Chung, J. I., Kiang, Y. H., Xiao, L. Y., & Hageman, M. J. (2019). The application of machine learning algorithms in understanding the effect of core/shell technique on improving powder compactability. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 555, 368–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rong, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhang, G., Yue, C., Gu, Y., Huang, Y., & Shao, X. (2015). Parameters optimization of laser brazing in crimping butt using Taguchi and BPNN-GA. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 67, 94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu, X., Zhang, X., Jia, M., Fan, L., Lu, W., & Zhai, X. (2018). 5G-based green broadband communication system design with simultaneous wireless information and power transfer. Physical Communication, 28, 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, X., & Zhang, X. (2018). Rate and energy efficiency improvements for 5G-based IoT with simultaneous transfer. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 6(4), 5971–5980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu, X., & Zhang, X. (2019). NOMA-based resource allocation for cluster-based cognitive industrial internet of things. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16(8), 5379–5388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu, X., Zhai, X. B., Lu, W., & Wu, C. (2019). QoS-guarantee resource allocation for multibeam satellite industrial internet of things with NOMA. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17(3), 2052–2061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Raja Guru.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Raja Guru, R., Vimala Devi, K. & Marichamy, P. Spectrum selection and decision using neural and fuzzy optimization approaches. Wireless Netw 28, 1731–1755 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-022-02932-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-022-02932-y

Keywords

Navigation