Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rapid and Precise GLONASS GDOP Approximation using Neural Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Russian global navigation satellite system (GLONASS) provides civilian and military users three-dimensional position determination and navigation services as same as US global positioning system. Geometric dilution of precision (GDOP) provides a simple interpretation of positioning precision. Usual method for GLONASS GDOP calculation is matrix inversion. However this process imposes a huge calculation load on receiver, especially when large number of visible satellites exists. To overcome this problem, artificial neural network is used. Different configurations and training methods are simulated on a data base obtained by a GLONASS receiver. Then navigation precision and execution times are explored and compared. Results show that recurrent neural network has 0.00024 RMS error, which is the best against other focused tools including feed forward back propagation and radial basis function neural network with usual training and with genetic algorithm adopted weights and biases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GLONASS Interface Control Document Navigational Radio Signal in Bands L1, L2. Edition 5.1, Russia, 2008.

  2. Walter, T., Blanch, J., Choi, M. J., Reid, T., & Enge, P. (2013). Incorporating GLONASS into aviation RAIM receivers. In Proceedings of the international technical meeting of the institute of navigation.

  3. Constantinescu, A., & Landry, R. J. (2005). GPS/Galileo/GLONASS hybrid satellite constellation simulator-GPS constellation validation analysis. In 61st annual meeting of the institute of navigation (pp. 733–737).

  4. Melgard, T., Vigen, E., & Orpen, O. (2009) Advantages of combined GPS and GLONASS PPP—experiences based on G2. A new service from Fugro. In 13th IAIN World Congress, Stockholm.

  5. Blanch, J., Walter, T., & Enge, P. (2012). Satellite navigation for aviation in 2025. In Proceedings of the IEEE special centennial issue (Vol. 100, pp. 1821–1830).

  6. Yarlagadda, R., Ali, I., Al-Dhahir, N., & Hershey, J. (2000). GPS GDOP metric. IEEE Proceedings on Radar, Sonar and Navigation, 147, 259–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Azami, H., Mosavi, M. R., & Sanei, S. (2013). Classification of GPS satellites using improved back propagation training algorithms. Journal of Wireless Personal Communications, 71(2), 789–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Simon, D., & El-Sherief, H. (2005). Navigation satellite selection using neural networks. Journal of Neurocomputing, 7, 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jwo, D. J., & Chin, K. P. (2002). Applying back-propagation neural networks to GDOP approximation. Journal of Navigation, 55(1), 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tafazoli, S., & Mosavi, M. R. (2011). Performance improvement of GPS GDOP approximation using recurrent wavelet neural network. Journal of Geographic Information System, 3(4), 318–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ch, W., Su, W., & Yw, H. (2011). A study on GPS GDOP approximation using support-vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 60(1), 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kovach, K. (200). New user equivalent range error (UERE) budget for the modernized navstar global positioning system (GPS). In Proceedings of the 2000 national technical meeting of the institute of navigation (pp. 550–573).

  13. Jwo, D. J., & Lai, C. C. (2007). Neural network-based GPS GDOP approximation and classification. Journal of GPS Solutions, 11(1), 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saraf, M., Mohammadi, K., & Mosavi, M. R. (2011). Bayesian framework on GPS GDOP classification. Journal of Computers and Electrical Engineering, 37, 1009–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mosavi, M. R., & Azami, H. (2011). Applying neural network for clustering of GPS satellites. Journal of Geoinformatics, 7(3), 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karry, F. O., & De Silva, C. (2004). Soft computing and intelligent systems design: theory, tools and applications. Pearson: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mosavi, M. R. (2007). GPS receivers timing data processing using neural networks: Optimal estimation and errors modeling. Journal of Neural Systems, 17(5), 383–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mosavi, M. R. (2011). Wavelet neural network for corrections prediction in single-frequency GPS users. Neural Processing Letters, 33(2), 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tabatabaei, A., Mosavi, M. R., & Farajiparvar, P. (2012). A traveling-wave fault location technique for three-terminal lines based on wavelet analysis and recurrent neural network using GPS timing. In Conference on smart electrical grids technology (SEGT2012) (pp. 154–158, 18–19).

  20. Mosavi, M. R. (2010). Estimation of pseudo-range DGPS corrections using neural networks trained by evolutionary algorithms. Journal of Review of Electrical Engineering, 5(6), 2715–2721.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Mosavi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tabatabaei, A., Mosavi, M.R. Rapid and Precise GLONASS GDOP Approximation using Neural Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 77, 2675–2685 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-1660-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-014-1660-z

Keywords

Navigation