Skip to main content
Log in

A Comparative Study of Spread OFDM with Transmit Diversity for Underwater Acoustic Communications

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper compares the effectiveness of different spread OFDM techniques with transmit diversity used for underwater acoustic communications. Spreading by Walsh-Hadamard codes, discrete Fourier transform, discrete cosine transform and carrier interferometry (CI) codes have been combined with the application of space-time and space-frequency transmit diversity in OFDM for underwater acoustic communication. The spreading technique helps overcome frequency-selective and multipath fading and also provides reduced peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR). The application of space time and space frequency coding techniques improves the data rate and reliability of the spread OFDM scheme in terms of bit error rate (BER). Simulation results show that all the spread OFDM schemes show better BER performance in underwater environment when transmit diversity schemes are used. CI spread OFDM with space-frequency block coding shows a BER of \(1\times 10^{-6}\) at a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of \(13.6\) dB and is proposed as one of the best scheme. This gain in SNR may be used to further increase the data transmission rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmed, N., Natarajan, T., & Rao, K. R. (1974). Discrete cosine transform. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C–23(1), 90–93.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Mahmoud, M., & Zoltowski, M.D. (2009). Performance evaluation of code-spread OFDM using vandermonde spreading. In IEEE radio and wireless symposium, pp. 320–323.

  3. Alamouti, S. (1998). A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 16(8), 1451–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dlugaszewski, Z., & Wesolowski, K. (2000). WHT/OFDM—an improved OFDM transmission method for selective fading channels. In symposium on communications and vehicular technology, 2000. SCVT-200, pp. 144–149.

  5. Domingo, M. C. (2008). Overview of channel models for underwater wireless communication networks. Physical Communication, 1(3), 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Han, S. H., & Lee, J. H. (2005). An overview of peak-to-average power ratio reduction techniques for multicarrier transmission. IEEE Wireless Communications, 12(2), 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kumar, P., & Kumar, P. (2012). Performance evaluation of DFT-spread OFDM and DCT-spread OFDM for underwater acoustic communication. In IEEE vehicular technology conference (VTC fall), (pp. 1–5).

  8. Kumar, P., & Kumar, P. (2013). Performance evaluation of modified OFDM for underwater communications. In IEEE international conference on communications 2013: IEEE ICC’13—workshop on radar and sonar networks (pp. 977–981). Budapest: Hungary.

  9. Mukherjee, M., & Kumar, P. (2011). Overloaded WH-spread CI/MC-CDMA with iterative interference cancellation. IEEE Communications Letters, 15(12), 1391–1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Otnes, R., Asterjadhi, A., Casari, P., Goetz, M., Husy, T., Nissen, I., et al. (2012). Underwater acoustic networking techniques. Briefs in electrical and computer engineering. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Proakis, J. G., Sozer, E. M., Rice, J. A., & Stojanovic, M. (2001). Shallow water acoustic networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 39(11), 114–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shanlin, S., Chunping, H., Lei, Y., & Jinlin, F. (2008). A novel method based DCT to reduce PAPR of OFDM systems. In 4th International conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing, 2008. WiCOM ’08, (pp. 1–5).

  13. Stojanovic, M., & Preisig, J. (2009). Underwater acoustic communication channels: Propagation models and statistical characterization. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47(1), 84–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wiegandt, D.A., Nassar, C.R., & Wu, Z. (2004). The elimination of peak-to-average power ratio concerns in OFDM via carrier interferometry spreading codes: A multiple constellation analysis. In proceedings of the thirty-sixth southeastern symposium on system theory, (pp. 323–327).

  15. Xu, F., Hu, X., & Xu, R. (2007). A novel implementation of carrier interferometry OFDM in an underwater acoustic channel. In IEEE OCEANS—Europe, (pp. 1–5).

  16. Yonghuai, Z., Haixin, S., En, C., & Weijie, S. (2010). An underwater acoustic implementation of DFT-spread OFDM. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2010(7), 1–7.

  17. Zielinski, A., Yoon, Y. H., & Wu, L. (1995). Performance analysis of digital acoustic communication in a shallow water channel. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 20(4), 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prashant Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, P., Kumar, P. A Comparative Study of Spread OFDM with Transmit Diversity for Underwater Acoustic Communications. Wireless Pers Commun 83, 69–86 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2380-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-015-2380-8

Keywords

Navigation