Skip to main content
Log in

Design and Analysis of Novel Precoding Scheme for LSAS Using Power Allocation

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Massive MIMO systems (also known as “large-scale antenna system” and “full-dimension MIMO”) significantly reduce air interface latency by using a large excess of service antennas over active terminals and time-division duplex operation. We consider the downlink of a time-division duplexing multicell multiuser MIMO system in which the base transceiver stations are equipped with a very large number of antennas. Assuming channel estimation through uplink pilots, arbitrary antenna correlations, and user distributions, we derive approximations of achievable rates with linear precoding techniques—namely, zero forcing, matched filtering, eigen-beamforming (EBF), and regularized zero-forcing (RZF). The approximations are tight in the large system limit with an infinitely large number of antennas and user terminals, but they match our simulations for realistic system dimensions. We further show that a simple EBF precoding scheme can achieve the same performance as RZF with one order of magnitude fewer antennas in both uncorrelated and correlated fading channels. Our simulation results show that our proposed precoding scheme is better than the conventional scheme. Moreover, we have used two channel environments for further analysis of our algorithm—long-term evolution advanced and millimeter wave mobile broadband channels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marzetta, T. L. (2010). Noncooperative cellular wireless with unlimited numbers of base station antennas. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 9(11), 3590–3600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pitarokoilis, A., Mohammed, S. K., & Larsson, E. G. (2012). On the optimality of single-carrier transmission in large-scale antenna systems. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 1(4), 276–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hong, M., Sun, R.-Y., Baligh, H., & Luo, Z.-Q. (2013). Joint base station clustering and beamformer design for partial coordinated transmission in heterogenous networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 31(2), 226–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marzetta, T. L. (2006). How much training is required for multiuser MIMO? In Proceedings of the Asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers (pp. 359–363). Illinois: Urbana Champaign.

  5. Rusek, F., et al. (2013). Scaling up MIMO: Opportuities and challenges with very large arrays. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 30(1), 40–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoydis, J., ten Brink, S., & Debbah, M. (2013). Massive MIMO in the UL/DL of cellular networks: How many antennas do we need? IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 31(2), 160–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Spencer, Q., Swindlehurst, A. L., & Haardt, M. (2004). Zero-forcing methods for downlink spatial multiplexing in multiuser MIMO channels. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 52, 462–471.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Chae, C. B., Mazzarese, D., Jindal, N., & Heath, R. W, Jr. (2008). Coordinated beamforming with limited feedback in the MIMO broadcast channel. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 26(8), 1505–1515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lau, B. K., Larsson, E. G., Marzetta, T. L., Edfors, O., Rusek, F., Persson, D., et al. (2013). Scaling up MIMO: Opportunities and challenges with large arrays. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 30(1), 40–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rusek, F., Persson, D., Lau, B. K., Larsson, E. G., Marzetta, T. L., Edfors, O., et al. (2013). Scaling up MIMO: Opportunities and challenges with very large arrays. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 30(1), 40–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. He, C., et al. (2012). Energy efficiency and spectral efficiency tradeoff in downlink distributed antenna systems. IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, 1(3), 153–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang, Y., et al. (2012). Transmitter beamforming and artificial noise with delayed feedback: Secrecy rate and power allocation. Journal of Communications and Networks, 14(4), 374–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2013R1A1A2007779). This work was supported by the ICT R&D program of MSIP/IITP. [14-000-04-001, Development of 5G Mobile Communication Technologies for Hyper-connected Smart Services]. This work was supported by the Human Resource Training Program for Regional Innovation and Creativity through the Ministry of Education and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2014H1C1A1066568).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Intae Hwang.

Appendix

Appendix

When the massive MIMO system adopts precoding, the approximate power allocation vector achieving the optimal PA is

$$P^{o} = \left[ {\tilde{H}^{ - 1} b} \right]^{ + }$$

where

$$\left[ x \right]^{ + } = max\left\{ {0,x_{i} } \right\}, b = \left[ {b_{1} ,b_{2} , \ldots ,b_{K} } \right]^{T} ,$$

and

$$b_{k} = \frac{{\eta \left\| {h_{k} } \right\|^{2} }}{{\eta_{PE}^{o} ln2}} - \frac{{\sigma^{2} }}{{\beta_{k} }}$$
$$\tilde{H} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\left\| {h_{1} } \right\|^{2} /\mu } & 1 & \cdots & 1 \\ 1 & {\left\| {h_{2} } \right\|^{2} /\mu } & \cdots & 1 \\ \vdots & \vdots & \ddots & \vdots \\ 1 & 1 & \cdots & {\left\| {h_{k} } \right\|^{2} /\mu } \\ \end{array} } \right]$$

where \(\tilde{H} = {\text{diag}}\left\{ {\left\| {h_{1} } \right\|^{2} ,\left\| {h_{2} } \right\|^{2} , \ldots ,\left\| {h_{K} } \right\|^{2} } \right\}/\mu + 1_{K \times K} - I_{K \times K}\) and \({\text{b}} = \left[ {b_{1} ,b_{2} , \ldots ,b_{K} } \right]^{ }\), \(b_{K} = \frac{{\eta \left\| {h_{K} } \right\|^{2} }}{{\mu \eta_{PE}^{o} ln2}} - \frac{{\sigma^{2} }}{{\beta_{k} }}.\) \(\eta_{PE}^{o}\) unique globally optimal power allocation. As the independence of \({\text{h}}_{l} \left( {l = 1,2, \ldots ,K} \right)\), the rank of the matrix \(\tilde{H}\) is K. Therefore,\(\tilde{H}\) is invertible and the power allocation is expressed as

$$P^{o} = \left[ {\tilde{H}^{ - 1} b} \right]^{ + }$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malik, S., Moon, S., Kim, B. et al. Design and Analysis of Novel Precoding Scheme for LSAS Using Power Allocation. Wireless Pers Commun 91, 811–828 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3498-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-016-3498-z

Keywords

Navigation