Skip to main content
Log in

Load Balancing Efficiency Improvement Using Hybrid Scheduling Algorithm in LTE Systems

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long term evolution (LTE) is a recently evolving technology which ensures the reliable delivery of the heterogeneous traffic services with high speed data rate and lower delays through their mobile and other hand held devices. The key feature of LTE is its traffic engineering which is used for effectively managing the network resources for efficient utilization. When LTE expertise has arisen there are some prevailing problems to be taken care of i.e. load balancing and traffic scheduling. Even LTE is the debauched technology, but it is also been anguishing from these problems. In this paper, a load balancing strategy has been espoused that is based on traffic scheduling. Various Traffic scheduling algorithms are designed earlier to assign shared resources among users to optimize the performance of LTE systems in an efficient manner. The performance of three types of scheduling algorithms is compared in this paper namely first come first serve (FCFS), round robin (RR) and hybrid algorithm which is the combination of FCFS and RR in extremes conditions. The discussed scheduling algorithms performance is measured in terms of symbol error rate and signal to noise ratio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 3GPP. Technical specification group radio access network—physical channel and modulation (Release 8), 3GPP TS 36.211.

  2. Parkvall, S., Dahlman, E., & Furuskar, A. (2008). LTE advanced–evolving LTE towards IMT-advanced. In Proceedings of IEEE vehicular technology conference (pp. 1–5), Singapore: VTC-Spring.

  3. Sesia, S., Toufik, I., & Baker, M. (2009). LTE–The UMTS long term evolution- from theory to practice. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Furht, B., & Ahson, S. A. (2009). Long term evolution: 3GPP LTE radio and cellular technology. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Divya, R., & Huseyin, A. (2009). 3GPP—long term evolution—a technical study. Berlin: Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A Technical White Paper. Long term evolution (LTE): A technical overview. Motorola.

  7. Astely, D., Dahlman, E., Furuskar, A., Jading, Y., Lindstrom, M., & Parkvall, S. LTE: The evolution of mobile broadband. LTE PART11: 3GPP Release, Ericsson Research.

  8. Meyer, M. (2006). ARQ concept for the UMTS long-term evolution. Montreal: VTC Fall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Bu, T., Li, L., & Ramjee, R. (2006). Generalized proportional fair scheduling in third generation wireless data networks. In IEEE Proc. INFOCOM.

  10. Wang, H., Ding, L., Wu, P., Pan, Z., Liu, N., & You, X. (2010). Dynamic load balancing and throughput optimization in 3GPP LTE networks. Caen: IWCMC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Son, K., Chong, S., & Veciana, G. (2009). Dynamic association for load balancing and interference avoidance in multi-cell networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 8(7), 3566–3576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tonguz, O. K., & Yanmaz, E. (2008). The mathematical theory of dynamic load balancing in cellular networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 7(12), 1504–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eklundh, B. (1986). Channel utilization and blocking probability in a cellular mobile telephone system with directed retry. IEEE Transactions in Comm., 34(3), 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang, H., & Rappaport, S. S. (1994). CBWL: A new channel assignment and sharing method for cellular communication systems. IEEE Transactions Vehicular Technology, 43(4), 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Das, S., Viswanathan, H., & Rittenhouse, G. (2003). Dynamic load balancing through coordinated scheduling in packet data systems. In IEEE Proc. INFOCOM.

  16. Son, K., Chong, S., & Veciana, G. (2009). Dynamic association for load balancing and interference avoidance in multi-cell networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 8(7), 3566–3576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gidlund, M., Laneri, J. C. Scheduling algorithms for 3GPP long-term evolution systems: From a quality of service perspective. In 10th IEEE international symposium on spread spectrum techniques and applications (ISSSTA) (pp. 114–117).

  18. Basukala, R., Ramli, H. M., & Sandrasegaran, K. (2009). Performance analysis of EXP/PF and M-LWDF in downlink 3GPP LTE system. In First asian himalayas international conference on internet (pp 1–5).

  19. Wang, Y., Li, G., Wu, T., & Gong, F. (2010). Adaptive proportional fair scheduling in multihop OFDMA systems. In IEEE 71st vehicular technology conference (pp. 1–5).

  20. Yang, C., Wang, W., Qian, Y., & Zhang, X. (2008). A weighted proportional fair scheduling to maximize best-effort service utility in multicell network. In IEEE 19th international symposium on indoor and mobile radio communications (pp. 1–5).

  21. Choi, J. G., & Bahk, S. (2007). Cell-throughput analysis of the proportional fair scheduler in the single-cell environment. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 56, 766–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sonia, Khanna, R. & Kumar, N. Load Balancing Efficiency Improvement Using Hybrid Scheduling Algorithm in LTE Systems. Wireless Pers Commun 96, 4299–4311 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4387-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-4387-9

Keywords

Navigation