Skip to main content
Log in

A Distance Based Reliable Cooperative Spectrum Sensing Algorithm in Cognitive Radio

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spectrum sensing is the most critical task in cognitive radio (CR) which needs to be performed very precisely in order to efficiently utilize the underutilized spectrum and to provide sufficient protection to the primary users (PUs). To improve the sensing performance under fading, shadowing and hidden terminal problems more than one CR users collaboratively perform the spectrum sensing called as cooperative spectrum sensing (CSS). In conventional CSS the decision of each CR is fused at fusion center with equal weights. But due to variable distance of each CR from the PU all decisions are not equally reliable and therefore should be assigned different weights according to their reliability. In this paper we propose a new weighting scheme for CSS under Rayleigh faded channel. In proposed weighting scheme, based on the distance of each CR from the PU reliability of CR nodes is determined and correspondingly appropriate weights are assigned to different users. The CSS algorithm using new weighting scheme gives better performance than conventional CSS algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mitola, J., & Maguire, G. Q. (1999). Cognitive radio: Making soft-ware radio more personal. IEEE Personal Communications, 6(4), 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar, S., & Sahay, J. (2011). Cognitive radio concept and challenges in dynamic spectrum access for the future generation wireless communications systems. Wireless Personal Communications, 59, 525–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cabric, D., Mishra S. M., & Brodersen, R. W. (2004). Implementation issues in spectrum sensing for cognitive radios. In Proceedings 38th. Asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers (pp. 772–776).

  4. Federal Communications Commission, Spectrum policy task force. In Report, FCC 02-155, Nov. 2002.

  5. Stotas, S., & Nallanathan, A. (2011). Enhancing the capacity of spectrum sharing cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technolgy, 60(8), 3768–3779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, X., & et al. (2014). Matched filter based spectrum sensing and power level detection for cognitive radio network. In IEEE conference on signal processing for cognitive radios and networks.

  7. Yucek, T., & Arslan, H. (2009). A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 11(1), 116–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghozzi, M., & et al. (2006). Cyclostationarity-based test for detection of vacant frequency bands. In International conference on cognitive radio oriented wireless networks and communication.

  9. Liu, H., & Chen, W. (2012). Double threshold cooperative spectrum sensing algorithm based on energy and eigen value of signal. Journal of Computational Information Systems, 8, 9449–9456.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lataief, K. B., & Zhang, W. (2009). Cooperative communications for cognitive radio networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 97(5), 878–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Akyildiz, I. F., Lo, B. F., & Balakrishnan, R. (2011). Cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: A survey. Physical Communication (Elsevier) Journal, 4(1), 40–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma, J., Zhao, G., & Li, Y. (2008). Soft combination and detection for cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(11), 4502–4507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Raza, U., et al. (2013). A comaparative study of spectrum awareness techniques for cognitive radio oriented wireless network. Physical Communication (Elsevier) Journal, 9, 148–170.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vistotsky, E., Kuffner, S., & Peterson, R. (2005). On collaborative detection of TV transmissions in support of dynamic spectrum sharing. In IEEE international symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks, (pp. 338–345) Baltimore, MD.

  15. Zhang, W., et al. (2009). Optimization of cooperative spectrum sensing with energy detection in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 8(12), 5761–5766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma, J., et al. (2008). Soft combination and detection for cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 7(11), 4502–4507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Peh, E. C. Y., et al. (2010). Cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks with weighted decision fusion schemes. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 9(12), 3838–3847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xiao, L., Liu, K., & Ma, L. (2010). A weighted cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. In IEEE international conference on information networking and automation (ICINA), Vol. 2.

  19. Fu, J,. & et al. (2012). Improved weighted cooperative sensing algorithm based on distributed optimization in cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of 31st Chinese control conference, July 25–27, Hefei, China.

  20. Verma, G., & Sahu, O. P. (2016). Intelligent selection of threshold in cognitive radio system. Springer Journal on Telecommunication Systems, pp. 1–10.

  21. Wang, N., et al. (2013). Adaptive spectrum sensing algorithm under different primary user utilizations. IEEE Communications Letters, 17(9), 1838–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin, Y.-E., et al. (2013). On using interference-aware spectrum sensing for dynamic spectrum access in cognitive radio networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 12(3), 461–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kan. C., & et al. (2013). Optimization of cooperative sensing in interference-aware cognitive radio networks over imperfect reporting channel. In IEEE international conference on wireless communication and signal processing (WCSP), (pp. 1–6).

  24. Kan. C., and et al. (2012). Sensing-throughput tradeoff for interference-aware cognitive radio networks. In IEEE international conference on computer science and network technology (ICCSNT), (pp. 660–665).

  25. Nasreddine, J., & et al. (2010). Location-based adaptive detection threshold for dynamic spectrum access. In IEEE symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum (pp. 1–10).

  26. Ye, Z., & et al. (2008). Energy detection using estimated noise variance for spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. In IEEE conference, wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC) (pp. 711–716).

  27. Xiao, L., et al. (2007). Sensor-Assisted Localization in Cellular Systems. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6(12), 4244–4248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Werner, J., & et al. (2013). Estimating the primary user location and transmit power in cognitive radio systems using extended kalman filters. In IEEE international conference on wireless on-demand network systems and services (WONS) (pp. 68–73).

  29. Radhi, N., & et al. (2011). Estimate primary user localization using cognitive radio networks. In IEEE international conference on innovations in information technology (IIT) (pp. 381–385).

  30. Wang, J., and et al. (2010). Weighted centroid algorithm for estimating primary user location: Theoretical analysis and distributed implementation, arXiv:1011.2313 (pp. 1–25).

  31. Wild, B., and et al. (2005). Detecting primary receivers for cognitive radio applications. In IEEE symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks (DySPAN) (pp. 124–130).

  32. Gupta, M., Verma, G. and Dubey, R. K. (2016). Cooperative spectrum sensing for cognitive radio based on adaptive threshold. In proceedings of second IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and communication technology (CICT-2016).

  33. Verma, G., & Sahu, O. P. (2015). Interference aware optimization of throughput in cognitive radio system. Defence Science Journal, 65, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Verma, G., and Sahu, O.P. (2015). Throughput enhancement to the cognitive radio networks under the precaution is better than the cure approach (PBC). In Proceedings, IEEE international conference, signal processing and communication engineering systems (SPACES), K.L. University (pp. 1–4).

  35. Verma, G., and Sahu, O.P. (2015). Throughput enhancement to the cognitive radio networks under the precaution based cooperation of the primary users. In Proceedings, IEEE international conference, signal processing, informatics, communication and energy systems (SPICES), NIT Calicut, Kerala (pp. 1–4).

  36. Verma, G., and Sahu, O. P. Overcoming the barrier of sensing-throughput tradeoff in cognitive radio networks. In processing, wireless networks, Springer.

  37. Choi, Y. J., et al. (2012). Throughput analysis of cooperative spectrum sensing in Rayleigh-faded cognitive radio systems. IET Communication, 6(9), 1104–1110.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaurav Verma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Verma, G., Sahu, O.P. A Distance Based Reliable Cooperative Spectrum Sensing Algorithm in Cognitive Radio. Wireless Pers Commun 99, 203–212 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5052-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-017-5052-z

Keywords

Navigation