Abstract
The principle of Cloud Radio Access Network (C-RAN) is the split of traditional base stations into Radio Remote Units (RRU) as low-cost wireless access points, and Base Band Units (BBU) in a centralized location. This new RAN paradigm accepts several choices for a functional split of the protocol stack, with different latency requirements to the front-haul connecting a BBU with those RRUs under its control. In this paper, we focus on the functional split that implements the Medium Access Control layer at the BBU side. Particularly, we analyze the impact of delays on the report of the acknowledgment/negative acknowledgment messages for Hybrid Automatic Repeat reQuest (HARQ). In order to understand the trade-off between the HARQ report delay and user throughput, we define a new metric named as Net Rate. This metric is defined as the throughput that a user can reach after certain HARQ report delay while taking into account the actual channel conditions, the resource scheduling period to that user and the transmission window. The Net Rate metric can be used to determine the maximum HARQ report delay that can be tolerated by a user without throughput degradation. Our simulation results recommend the use for Mobile Edge Computing solutions to minimize the latencies of the front-haul connection and, thus, the impact of the HARQ delay on the throughput.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ericsson (2017). Ericsson mobility report. https://www.ericsson.com/assets/local/mobility-report/documents/2017/ericsson-mobility-report-november-2017.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2018.
Zanella, A., Bui, N., Castellani, A., Vangelista, L., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Internet of things for smart cities. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 1(1), 22–32.
Lien, S. Y., Chen, K. C., & Lin, Y. (2011). Toward ubiquitous massive accesses in 3GPP machine-to-machine communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 49(4), 66–74.
Sezer, S., Scott-Hayward, S., Chouhan, P. K., Fraser, B., Lake, D., Finnegan, J., et al. (2013). Are we ready for SDN? Implementation challenges for software-defined networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(7), 36–43.
Mijumbi, R., Serrat, J., Gorricho, J. L., Bouten, N., Turck, F. D., & Boutaba, R. (2016). Network function virtualization: State-of-the-art and research challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 18(1), 236–262.
Wu, J., Zhang, Z., Hong, Y., & Wen, Y. (2015). Cloud radio access network (C-RAN): a primer. IEEE Network, 29(1), 35–41.
3GPP TR 38.801 v2.0.0 (2018). Study on new radio access technology: Radio access architecture and interfaces (Release 14). http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/38_series/38.801/38801-200.zip. Accessed 28 May 2018.
NGMN Forum (2015). Further study on critical C-RAN technologies. Technical Deliverable. https://www.ngmn.org/fileadmin/user_upload/NGMN_RANEV_D2_Further_Study_on_Critical_C-RAN_Technologes_v1.0.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2018.
Rost, P., Bernardos, C., Domenico, A., Girolamo, M., Lalam, M., Maeder, A., et al. (2014). Cloud technologies for flexible 5G radio access networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(5), 68–76.
Fajardo, J. O., Liberal, F., Giannoulakis, I., et al. (2016). Introducing mobile edge computing capabilities through distributed 5G cloud enabled small cells. Mobile Networks and Applications, 21(4), 564–574.
3GPP TS 36.321 v15.1.0. (2018). Medium access control (MAC) protocol specification (Release 15). http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/specs/archive/36_series/36.321/36321-f10.zip. Accessed May 28, 2018.
3GPP TS 36.213 v15.1.0. (2018). Physical layer procedures (Release 15). http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/specs/archive/36_series/36.213/36213-f10.zip. Accessed May 28, 2018.
Sesia, S., Toufik, I., & Baker, M. (2009). LTE—The UMTS long term evolution: From theory to practice. New York: Wiley.
Carreras, A., Delgado-Luque, I. M., Martin-Vega, F. J., Gomez, G., Aguayo-Torres, M. C., & Entrambasaguas, J. T. (2018). A system-level simulator for the downlink of LTE-A: Case of study—Cell-offloading in HetNets. Wireless Personal Communications, 100(1), 177–191.
ITU-R M.2135-1. (2009). Guidelines for evaluation of radio interface technologies for IMT-advanced. https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-r/opb/rep/R-REP-M.2135-1-2009-PDF-E.pdf. Accessed May 28, 2018.
Blanquez-Casado, F., Gomez, G., Aguayo-Torres, M. C., & Entrambasaguas, J. T. (2016). eOLLA: An enhanced outer loop link adaptation for cellular networks. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2016, 20.
Liu, X., Chong, E. K. P., & Shroff, N. B. (2002). A framework for opportunistic scheduling in wireless networks. Computer Networks, 41(4), 451–474.
Acknowledgements
This work has been partially supported by the Spanish Government (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad) under Grant TEC2016-80090-C2 and by the Universidad de Málaga.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carreras, A., Delgado-Luque, I.M., Martín-Vega, F.J. et al. Impact of Front-Haul Delays in Non-ideal Cloud Radio Access Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 106, 2005–2022 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5898-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-5898-8