Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Non-uniform Quantized Data Fusion Rule for Data Rate Saving and Reducing Control Channel Overhead for Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper a pretty new concept of non-uniform quantized data fusion (N-QDF) rule reducing control channel data overhead has been proposed for energy detection based cooperative spectrum sensing scheme in cognitive radio networks. To strike a balance between efficient detection performance and less complexity, the network has to allow soften hard or quantized data fusion (QDF) technique though this technique incurs few bit overhead on the control channel from each user. Again lower bit QDF causes loss of more information, where as higher bit QDF increases detection probability at the cost of some extra bits per user. Here lies the beauty of NQDF scheme which uses variable number of bits: more number of bits for lower energy region—thus increases detection probability for a given false alarm, and less number of bits for higher energy region—thus data rate gets saved which in turn alleviates control channel overhead. A holistic simulation study has been done in this very paper where the performance of variable bit NQDF scheme is compared with different uniform bit i.e. 2, 3, 4, 5 QDF with respect to different parameters to validate our proposed scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. FCC, ET Docket No 03-322 notice of proposed rule making and order, Dec 2003.

  2. Banerjee, J. S., Chakraborty, A., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2018). Reliable best-relay selection for secondary transmission in co-operation based cognitive radio systems: A multi-criteria approach. Journal of Mechanics of Continua and Mathematical Sciences, 13(2), 24–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chakraborty, A., Banerjee, J. S., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2017). Non-uniform quantized data fusion rule alleviating control channel overhead for cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. In Advance Computing Conference (IACC), 2017 IEEE 7th International (pp. 210–215). IEEE.

  4. Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, W.-Y., Vuran, M. C., & Mohanty, S. (2006). Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 50(13), 2127–2159.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Akyildiz, I. F., Wang, X., & Wang, W. (2005). Wireless mesh networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 47(4), 445–487.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Akyildiz, I. F., Lee, W. Y., & Chowdhury, K. R. (2009). CRAHNs: Cognitive radio ad hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 7(5), 810–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Banerjee, J. S., & Chakraborty, A. (2015). Fundamentals of software defined radio and cooperative spectrum sensing: a step ahead of cognitive radio networks. In N. Kaabouch & W. Hu (Eds.), Handbook of research on software-defined and cognitive radio technologies for dynamic spectrum management (pp. 499–543). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Banerjee, J. S., & Chakraborty, A. (2014). Modeling of software defined radio architecture and cognitive radio, the next generation dynamic and smart spectrum access technology. In M. H. Rehmani & Y. Faheem (Eds.), Cognitive radio sensor networks: Applications, architectures, and challenges (pp. 127–158). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Banerjee, J. S., Chakraborty, A., & Karmakar, K. (2013). Architecture of cognitive radio networks. In N. Meghanathan & Y. B. Reddy (Eds.), Cognitive radio technology applications for wireless and mobile ad hoc networks (pp. 125–152). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Haykin, S. (2005). Cognitive radio: Brain-empowered wireless communications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 23(2), 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yucek, T., & Arslan, H. (2009). A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio application. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 11(1), 116–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang, T., & Qu, D. (2008). On minimum sensing error with spectrum sensing using counting rule in cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of 4th annual international conference on wireless internet (WICON’08), Brussels, Belgium (pp. 1–9).

  13. Digham, F. F., Alouini, M.-S., & Simon, M. K. (2003). On the energy detection of unknown signals over fading channels. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on communications (Vol. 5, pp. 3575–3579).

  14. Chakraborty, A., & Banerjee, J. S. (2013). An advance Q learning (AQL) approach for path planning and obstacle avoidance of a mobile robot. International Journal of Intelligent Mechatronics and Robotics, 3(1), 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cabric, D., Mishra, S. M., & Brodersen, R. W. (2004). Implementation issues in spectrum sensing for cognitive radios. In Proceedings of Asilomar conference on signals, systems, and computers (Vol. 1, pp. 772–776).

  16. Peh, E., & Liang, Y.-C. (2007). Optimization for cooperative sensing in cognitive radio networks. In WCNC 11-15 (pp. 27–32).

  17. Unnikrishnan, J., & Veeravalli, V. V. (2007). Cooperative spectrum sensing and detection for cognitive radio. In IEEE GLOBCOM (pp. 2972–2976).

  18. Akyildiz, F., Lo, B. F., & Balakrishnan, R. (2011). Cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: A survey. Physical Communication (Elsevier) Journal, 4(1), 40–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, W., Mallik, R., & Letaief, K. (2008). Cooperative spectrum sensing optimization in cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on communications (pp. 3411–3415).

  20. Ganesan, G., & Li, Y. G. (2007). Cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio—Part I: Two user networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6(6), 2204–2213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ganesan, G., & Li, Y. G. (2007). Cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio—Part II: Multiuser networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 6(6), 2214–2222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mishra, S. M., Sahai, A., & Brodersen, R. W. (2006). Cooperative sensing among cognitive radios. In Proceedings of IEEE international conference on communications (Vol. 4, pp. 1658–1663).

  23. Ghasemi, A., & Sousa, E. S. (2005). Collaborative spectrum sensing for opportunistic access in fading environments. In Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks (pp. 131–136).

  24. Ma, J., & Li, Y. (2007). Soft combination and detection for cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (pp. 3139–3143).

  25. Teguig, D., Scheers, B., & Le Nir, V. (2012). Data fusion schemes for cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks. In 2012 Military Proceedings of IEEE international conference on communications and information systems conference (MCC). IEEE, 2012.

  26. Banerjee, J. S., Chakraborty, A., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2018). Relay node selection using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) for secondary transmission in multi-user cooperative cognitive radio systems. In Advances in Electronics, Communication and Computing (pp. 745–754). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Banerjee, J. S., Chakraborty, A., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2017). Fuzzy based relay selection for secondary transmission in cooperative cognitive radio networks. In Advances in Optical Science and Engineering (pp. 279–287). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Banerjee, J. S., & Karmakar, K. (2012). A comparative study on cognitive radio implementation issues. International Journal of Computer Applications, 45(15), 44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Banerjee, J. S., Chakraborty, A., & Chattopadhyay, A. (2018). A novel best relay selection protocol for cooperative cognitive radio systems using fuzzy AHP. Journal of Mechanics of Continua and Mathematical Sciences, 13(2), 72–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors deeply acknowledge the support from the Department of ECE, Bengal Institute of Technology (A unit of Techno India Group) and the department of ECE, University of Engineering and Management, and Kolkata (A unit of IEM UEM Group).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arpita Chakraborty.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chakraborty, A., Banerjee, J.S. & Chattopadhyay, A. Non-uniform Quantized Data Fusion Rule for Data Rate Saving and Reducing Control Channel Overhead for Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 104, 837–851 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-6054-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-6054-1

Keywords

Navigation