Skip to main content
Log in

Environment-Adaptation Based Hybrid Neural Network Predictor for Signal Propagation Loss Prediction in Cluttered and Open Urban Microcells

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the design and placement of radio base station transmitters, the accurate field signal power prediction and modelling is of critical importance. In this work, an adaptive neural network predictor which combines multilayer perception (MLP) and adaptive linear element (Adaline) is proposed for enhanced signal propagation loss prediction in microcellular urban environments. The prediction accuracy of the proposed Hybrid adaptive neural network predictor has been tested and evaluated using experimental field strength data acquired from LTE radio network environment with mixed residential, commercial and cluttered building structures. By means of first order statistical performance evaluation metrics, namely, regression coefficient (R), root mean squared error, standard deviation and mean absolute error, the proposed adaptive hybrid approach provide a better prediction accuracy compared to the standard MLP ANN prediction approach. The superior performance of the hybrid neural predictor can be attributed to its capability to learn, adaptively respond and predict the fluctuating patterns of the reference propagation loss data during training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amaldi, E., Capone, A., & Malucelli, F. (2008). Radio planning and coverage optimization of 3G cellular networks. Wireless Networks, 14(4), 435–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Isabona, J., & Srivastava, V. M. (2017). Coverage and link quality trends in suburban mobile broadband HSPA network environments. Wireless Personal Communications, 2017, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Neskovic, A., & Neskovic, N. (2010). Microcell electric field strength prediction model based upon artificial neural networks. International Journal Electronics and Communication (AEU), 64, 733–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ostlin, E., Zepernick, H.-J., & Suzuki, H. (2010). Macrocell path loss prediction using artificial neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 59(6), 2735–2747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Neskovic, A., Neskovic, N., & Paunovic, D. (2000). Indoor electric field level prediction model based on the artificial neural networks. IEEE Communication Letters, 4(6), 190–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Popescu, I., Nikitopoulos, D., Constantinou, P., & Nafornita, I. (2006). ANN prediction models for outdoor environment. In Proceeding of 17th IEEE international symposium on personal, indoor, mobile radio communication, Helsinki, Finland.

  7. Sharma, S., Kumar, V., & Kumar, R. (2012). Spervised online asaptive control of inverted pendulum system using ADALINE artificail neural networks with varying system parameters and external disturbance. International Journal of Interlligent Systems and Applications, 8, 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao, X. M., Gao, X. Z., Tanskanen, J. M. A., & Ovaska, S. J. (1997). Power prediction in mobile communication systems using an optimal neural-network structure. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 8(6), 1145–1455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ardalani, N., Khoogar, A., & Roohi, H. (2007). A comparison of Adaline and MLP neural network based predictors in SIR estimation in mobile DS/CDMA systems, world academy of science, engineering and technology. International Journal of Electrical, Computer, Energetic, Electronic and Communication Engineering, 1(9), 1382–1387.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gschwendtner, B. E., & Landstorfer, F. M. (1996). Adaptive propagation modeling using a hybrid neural technique. Electronics Letters, 32(3), 162–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Isabona, J., & Srivastava, V. M. (2016). Hybrid neural network approach for predicting signal propagation loss in urban microcells. In Proceeding of 2016 IEEE region 10 humanitarian technology conference (R10-HTC), Agra, India.

  12. Isabona, J., & Srivastava, V. M. (2016). A neural network based model for signal coverage propagation loss prediction in urban radio communication environment. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11(22), 11002–11008.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yonaba, H., Anctil, F., & Fortin, V. (2010). Comparing sigmoid transfer functions for neural network multistep ahead streamflow forecasting. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 15(4), 275–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Torre, A., Garcia, F., Moromi, I., Espinoza, P., & Acuna, L. (2015). Prediction of compression strength of high performance concrete using artificial neural networks. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 582, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Isabona.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebhota, V.C., Isabona, J. & Srivastava, V.M. Environment-Adaptation Based Hybrid Neural Network Predictor for Signal Propagation Loss Prediction in Cluttered and Open Urban Microcells. Wireless Pers Commun 104, 935–948 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-6061-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-018-6061-2

Keywords

Navigation