Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic Multi-layer Ensemble Classification Framework for Social Venues Using Binary Particle Swarm Optimization

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Multi-layer ensemble frameworks perform much better as compared to individual classifiers. However, selection of a classifier and its placement, impacts the overall performance of ensemble framework. This problem becomes very difficult, if there are more classifiers and layers. To address these problems in this paper, we design “Binary Particle Swarm Optimization” method for selection and placement of right classifiers in multi-layer ensemble model. Proposed classifier weight-assignment method is implemented to prioritize the selected classifiers. The model is simulated for the classification of social-user check-ins in Location-Based Social Network datasets. The experimental results show that the proposed ensemble model outperforms the state-of-the-art ensemble methods in the literature. It can be used by security firms, high level decision makers and various governmental organizations for tracking malicious users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cao, X., Cong, G., & Jensen, C. S. (2010). Mining significant semantic locations from gps data. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment, 3(1–2), 1009–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Foursquare Labs: Foursquare checkins. (2017). http://www.swarmapp.com.

  3. Yang, J., & Olafsson, S. (2006). Optimization-based feature selection with adaptive instance sampling. Computers & Operations Research, 33(11), 3088–3106.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Valentini, G. & Masulli, F. (2002). Ensembles of learning machines. In Italian workshop on neural nets, (pp. 3–20). Springer.

  5. Zolfaghar, K., Verbiest, N., Agarwal, J., Meadem, N., Chin, S.-C., Roy, S. B., Teredesai, A. et al. (2013). Predicting risk-of-readmission for congestive heart failure patients: A multi-layer approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.2094.

  6. Virrantaus, K., Markkula, J., Garmash, A., Terziyan, V., Veijalainen, J., Katanosov, A., & Tirri, H. (2001). Developing GIS-supported location-based services. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on web information systems engineering, 2001 (Vol. 2, pp. 66–75). IEEE.

  7. Emersion, B. J. (2011). Using location-based services to get customers. Franchising World, 43(7), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shugan, S. M. (2004). The impact of advancing technology on marketing and academic research. Informs, 1, 469–475.

    Google Scholar 

  9. CNET: Foursquare gives out unsolicited tips on iPhone. (2013). http://news.cnet.com/8301-10233-57606718-93/foursquare-gives-outunsolicitedtips-on-iphone.

  10. Cramer, H., Rost, M., & Holmquist, L. E. (2011). Performing a check-in: Emerging practices, norms and ’conflicts’ in location-sharing using foursquare. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on human computer interaction with mobile devices and services (pp. 57–66). ACM.

  11. Wang, D., Pedreschi, D., Song, C., Giannotti, F., & Barabasi, A.-L. (2011). Human mobility, social ties, and link prediction. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1100–1108). ACM.

  12. Chorley, M. J., Whitaker, R. M., & Allen, S. M. (2015). Personality and location-based social networks. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindqvist, J., Cranshaw, J., Wiese, J., Hong, J., & Zimmerman, J. (2011). I’m the mayor of my house: Examining why people use foursquare-a social-driven location sharing application. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2409–2418). ACM.

  14. Schwartz, R., & Halegoua, G. R. (2015). The spatial self: Location-based identity performance on social media. New Media & Society, 17(10), 1643–1660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Noulas, A., Scellato, S., Mascolo, C., & Pontil, M. (2011). An empirical study of geographic user activity patterns in foursquare. ICwSM, 11, 70–573.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Getoor, L., & Diehl, C. P. (2005). Link mining: A survey. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 7(2), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goswami, A., & Kumar, A. (2017). Challenges in the analysis of online social networks: A data collection tool perspective. Wireless Personal Communications, 97(3), 4015–4061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bliss, C. A., Frank, M. R., Danforth, C. M., & Dodds, P. S. (2014). An evolutionary algorithm approach to link prediction in dynamic social networks. Journal of Computational Science, 5(5), 750–764.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Torabi, N., Shakibian, H., & Charkari, N. M. (2016). An ensemble classifier for link prediction in location based social network. In Proceedings of the 24th Iranian conference on electrical engineering (ICEE) (pp. 529–532). IEEE.

  20. Gu, Y., Yao, Y., Liu, W., & Song, J. (2016). We know where you are: Home location identification in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference on computer communication and networks (ICCCN) (pp. 1–9). IEEE.

  21. Almallah, O. F., & Albayrak, S. (2017). Predicting venues in location based social network. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference on computer science, engineering and applications (CCSEA) (pp. 11–21). CSIT.

  22. Tian-ran, H., Luo, J., Kautz, H., & Sadilek, A. (2016). Home location inference from sparse and noisy data: models and applications. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 17(5), 389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cho, E., Myers, S.A., & Leskovec, J. (2011). Friendship and mobility: User movement in location-based social networks. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1082–1090). ACM.

  24. Parvin, H., MirnabiBaboli, M., & Alinejad-Rokny, H. (2015). Proposing a classifier ensemble framework based on classifier selection and decision tree. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 37, 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ghasemi, E., Kalhori, H., & Bagherpour, R. (2017). Stability assessment of hard rock pillars using two intelligent classification techniques: A comparative study. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 68, 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kotsiantis, S. B., Zaharakis, I., & Pintelas, P. (2007). Supervised machine learning: A review of classification techniques. Emerging Artificial Intelligence Applications in Computer Engineering, 160, 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yeh, I.-C., & Lien, C. (2009). The comparisons of data mining techniques for the predictive accuracy of probability of default of credit card clients. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2), 2473–2480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ibarguren, I., M Pérez, J., Muguerza, J., Gurrutxaga, I., & Arbelaitz, O. (2015). Coverage-based resampling: Building robust consolidated decision trees. Knowledge-Based Systems, 79, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Datta, S., & Das, S. (2015). Near-Bayesian support vector machines for imbalanced data classification with equal or unequal misclassification costs. Neural Networks, 70, 39–52.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Li, S., Zong, C., Wang, X. (2007). Sentiment classification through combining classifiers with multiple feature sets. In International conference on natural language processing and knowledge engineering, NLP-KE 2007 (pp. 135–140). IEEE.

  31. Dietterich, T. G., et al. (2000). Ensemble methods in machine learning. Multiple classifier systems, 1857, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kuncheva, L. I. (2004). Combining pattern classifiers: Methods and algorithms. New York: Wiley.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Orrite, C., Rodríguez, M., Martínez, F., & Fairhurst, M. (2008). Classifier ensemble generation for the majority vote rule. In Iberoamerican congress on pattern recognition (pp. 340–347). Springer.

  34. Wang, G., Hao, J., Ma, J., & Jiang, H. (2011). A comparative assessment of ensemble learning for credit scoring. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 223–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Marqués, A. I., García, V., & Sánchez, J. S. (2012). Exploring the behaviour of base classifiers in credit scoring ensembles. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(11), 10244–10250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Eberhart, R., & Kennedy, J. (1995). A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on micro machine and human science, MHS’95 (pp. 39–43). IEEE.

  37. Eberhart, R. C., & Kennedy, J. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. In Proceeding of IEEE international conference on neural network, Perth, Australia (pp. 1942–1948). IEEE.

  38. Ho, T. K. (1998). The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(8), 832–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Luh, G.-C., Lin, C.-Y., & Lin, Y.-S. (2011). A binary particle swarm optimization for continuum structural topology optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 11(2), 2833–2844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Pal, A., & Maiti, J. (2010). Development of a hybrid methodology for dimensionality reduction in mahalanobis-taguchi system using mahalanobis distance and binary particle swarm optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1286–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zeng, X.-P., Li, Y.-M., & Qin, J. (2009). A dynamic chain-like agent genetic algorithm for global numerical optimization and feature selection. Neurocomputing, 72(4), 1214–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tasgetiren, M. F., Suganthan, P. N., & Pan, Q.-Q. (2007). A discrete particle swarm optimization algorithm for the generalized traveling salesman problem. In Proceedings of the 9th annual conference on genetic and evolutionary computation (pp. 158–167). ACM.

  43. Mirjalili, S. A., & Hashim, S. Z. M. (2012). BMOA: Binary magnetic optimization algorithm. International Journal of Machine Learning and Computing, 2(3), 204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rashedi, E., Nezamabadi-Pour, H., & Saryazdi, S. (2010). BGSA: Binary gravitational search algorithm. Natural Computing, 9(3), 727–745.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Mirjalili, S., & Lewis, A. (2013). S-shaped versus V-shaped transfer functions for binary particle swarm optimization. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 9, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Yang, D., Zhang, D., & Bingqing, Q. (2016). Participatory cultural mapping based on collective behavior data in location-based social networks. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 7(3), 30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work is funded by SERB, MHRD, under Grant [EEQ/-2016/000413] for Secure and Efficient Communication inside Partitioned Social Overlay Networks project, currently going on at National Institute of Technology Goa, Ponda, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, National Institute of Technology Goa, Ponda, 403401, India

    Ahsan Hussain, Bettahally N. Keshavamurthy & Ramalingaswamy Cheruku

Authors
  1. Ahsan Hussain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bettahally N. Keshavamurthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ramalingaswamy Cheruku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahsan Hussain.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussain, A., Keshavamurthy, B.N. & Cheruku, R. Dynamic Multi-layer Ensemble Classification Framework for Social Venues Using Binary Particle Swarm Optimization. Wireless Pers Commun 105, 1491–1511 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06156-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06156-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation