Skip to main content
Log in

QoS in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A mobile ad hoc network (MANET) consists of mobile nodes communicating over wireless channels. Routing in MANETs is very challenging due to the random mobility of nodes and unreliability of wireless channels. Therefore most of the existing routing algorithms make only the best effort to find routes for communication but do not provide any performance guarantee. Because of the widespread use of MANETs in real-time applications, it becomes pertinent to provide deterministic network behavior. Quality of Service (QoS) aims to shape the network behavior and provide performance guarantees. In this work, a novel heuristic called Advanced-Optimised Link State Routing (A-OLSR) protocol is designed to provide QoS. It functions by enhancing the connectivity of nodes and establishing more stable routes as compared to standard best-effort Optimised Link State Routing (OLSR) protocol. The simulation results show that A-OLSR provides lower delay, reduces energy consumption and achieves higher throughput without introducing any additional routing overhead as compared to the standard OLSR and it’s variants-A\('\)-OLSR and A\(''\)-OLSR. The results also show that A-OLSR provides scalability since it’s performance remains consistent with the increasing size of network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giordano, S., et al. (2002). Mobile ad hoc networks. In Handbook of wireless networks and mobile computing (pp. 325–346).

  2. Hoebeke, J., Moerman, I., Dhoedt, B., & Demeester, P. (2004). An overview of mobile ad hoc networks: Applications and challenges. Journal Communications Network, 3(3), 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Royer, E. M., & Toh, C.-K. (1999). A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless networks. IEEE Personal Communications, 6(2), 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Perkins, C. E., & Bhagwat, P. (1994). Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance-vector routing (dsdv) for mobile computers. In ACM SIGCOMM computer communication review (Vol. 24, pp. 234–244). ACM.

  5. Clausen, T., & Jacquet, P. (2003). Optimized link state routing protocol (OLSR). Technical Report.

  6. Perkins, C., Belding-Royer, E., & Das, S. (2003). Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing. Technical Report.

  7. Park, V. D., & Corson, M. S. (1997). A highly adaptive distributed routing algorithm for mobile wireless networks. In INFOCOM’97. sixteenth annual joint conference of the IEEE computer and communications societies. Driving the Information Revolution., Proceedings IEEE (Vol. 3, pp. 1405–1413). IEEE.

  8. Pearlman, M. R., & Haas, Z. J. (1999). Determining the optimal configuration for the zone routing protocol. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 17(8), 1395–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rawat, P., Singh, K. D., Chaouchi, H., & Bonnin, J. M. (2014). Wireless sensor networks: A survey on recent developments and potential synergies. The Journal of Supercomputing, 68(1), 1–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li, W., Li, K., Huang, Y., Yang, S., & Yang, L. (2017). A EA- and ACA-based QoS multicast routing algorithm with multiple constraints for ad hoc networks. Soft Computing, 21(19), 5717–5727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu, T., Chang, S., Guo, W., & Huang, Q. (2017). Genetic algorithm for energy-aware QoS multicast routing in manets. Computer, 5(1), 10–20.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gurumoorthy, K., & Nirmal Kumar, A. (2017). Mutual constraint based GA suggested routing algorithm for improving QoS in clustered MANETS. Wireless Personal Communications, 98(3), 2975–2991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ramesh, S., & Smys, S. (2017). A software-based heuristic clustered (sbhc) architecture for the performance improvement in manet. Wireless Personal Communications, 97(4), 6343–6355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sedrati, M., & Benyahia, A. Multipath routing to improve quality of service for video streaming over mobile ad hoc networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 1–15.

  15. Zheng, T., & Ki-Il, K. (2010). A survey on real-time mac protocols in wireless sensor networks. Communications and Network, vol. 2010.

  16. Jims, M., Sarma, N., & Nandi, S. (2007). Priority based fairness provisioning QoS-aware mac protocol. In International conference on advanced computing and communications, 2007. ADCOM 2007 (pp. 593–598). IEEE.

  17. Saxena, N., Roy, A., & Shin, J. (2008). Dynamic duty cycle and adaptive contention window based QoS-mac protocol for wireless multimedia sensor networks. Computer Networks, 52(13), 2532–2542.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Yigitel, M. A., Incel, O. D., & Ersoy, C. (2011). Qos-aware mac protocols for wireless sensor networks: A survey. Computer Networks, 55(8), 1982–2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ehsan, S., & Hamdaoui, B. (2012). A survey on energy-efficient routing techniques with QoS assurances for wireless multimedia sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 14(2), 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marina, M. K., & Das, S. R. (2006). Ad hoc on-demand multipath distance vector routing. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 6(7), 969–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Venkataramana, A., & Setty, S. P. (2017). Enhance the quality of service in mobile ad hoc networks by using fuzzy based NTT-DYMO. Wireless Personal Communications, 95(3), 2989–3002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuppusamy, P., Thirunavukkarasu, K., & Kalaavathi, B. (2011). A study and comparison of OLSR, AODV and TORA routing protocols in ad hoc networks. In 2011 3rd international conference on electronics computer technology (ICECT) (Vol. 5, pp. 143–147). IEEE.

  23. Leguay, J., Conan, V., & Friedman, T. (2006). QoS routing in OLSR with several classes of service. In Fourth annual IEEE international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops, 2006. PerCom Workshops 2006 (pp. 6–pp). IEEE.

  24. Ge, Y., Kunz, T., & Lamont, L. (2003). Quality of service routing in ad-hoc networks using OLSR. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 2003 (pp. 9–pp). IEEE.

  25. Lavanya, S., & Bhagyaveni, M. (2017). Design of SOP based cross-layered opportunistic routing protocol for CR ad-hoc networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 96(4), 6543–6556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Munaretto, A., & Fonseca, M. (2007). Routing and quality of service support for mobile ad hoc networks. Computer Networks, 51(11), 3142–3156.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Hamzaoui, Y., Amnai, M., Choukri, A., & Fakhri, Y. (2017). Enhancing OLSR routing protocol using k-medoids clustering method in manets. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(2), 200–206.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Singal, G., Laxmi, V., Gaur, M. S., Rao, D. V., & Kushwaha, R. (2017). QoS-aware mesh based multicast routing protocols in ad-hoc networks: Concepts and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.09573.

  29. Issariyakul, T., & Hossain, E. (2011). Introduction to network simulator NS2. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pushp Sra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sra, P., Chand, S. QoS in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks. Wireless Pers Commun 105, 1599–1616 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06162-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06162-y

Keywords

Navigation