Skip to main content
Log in

Performance Analysis of Modular RF Front End for RF Fingerprinting of Bluetooth Devices

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radio frequency fingerprinting (RFF) could provide an efficient solution to address the security issues in wireless networks. The data acquisition system constitutes an important part of RFF. In this context, this paper presents an implementation of a modular RF front end system to be used in data acquisition for RFF. Modularity of the system provides flexible implementation options to suit diverse frequency bands with different applications. Moreover, the system is able to collect data by means of any digitizer, and enable to record the data at lower frequencies. Therefore, proposed RF front end system becomes a low-cost alternative to existing devices used in data acquisition. In its implementation, Bluetooth (BT) signals were used. Initially, transients of BT signals were detected by utilizing a large number of BT devices (smartphones). From the detected transients, distinctive signal features were extracted. Then, support vector machine (SVM) and neural networks (NN) classifiers were implemented to the extracted features for evaluating the feasibility of proposed system in RFF. As a result, 96.9% and 96.5% classification accuracies on BT devices have been demonstrated for SVM and NN classifiers respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Danev, B., Luecken, H., Capkun, S., & Defrawy, K. (2010). Attacks on physical-layer identification. In Proceedings of international conference on wireless network security (pp. 89–98). Hoboken, NJ, USA.

  2. Reising, D. R., Temple, M. A., & Jackson, J. A. (2018). Authorized and rogue device discrimination using dimensionally reduced RF-DNA fingerprints. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security,74, 296–307.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Merchant, K., Revay, S., Stantchev, G., et al. (2018). Deep learning for RF device fingerprinting in cognitive communication networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing,12(1), 160–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ramsey, B. W., Stubbs, T. D., Mullins, B. E., et al. (2015). Wireless infrastructure protection using low-cost radio frequency fingerprinting receivers. The International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection,8(1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rehman, S. U., Sowerby, K. W., & Coghill, C. (2014). Radio-frequency fingerprinting for mitigating primary user emulation attack in low-end cognitive radios. IET Communications,8(8), 1274–1284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ali, A. M., Uzundurukan, E., & Kara, A. (2019). Assessment of features and classifiers for bluetooth RF fingerprinting. IEEE Access,7, 50524–50535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Uzundurukan, E., Ali, A. M., & Kara, A. (2017). Design of low-cost modular RF front end for RF fingerprinting of bluetooth signals. In Proceedings of international conference on signal processing and communications applications (pp. 1–4). Antalya, Turkey.

  8. Gandhi, D., & Lyons, C. (2003). Mixer spur analysis with concurrently swept LO, RF and IF: tools and techniques. Microwave Journal,46(5), 212–220.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klein, R. W., Temple, M. A., & Mendenhall, M. J. (2009). Application of wavelet-based RF fingerprinting to enhance wireless network security. Journal of Communications and Networks,11(6), 544–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yuan, Y., Huang, Z., Wu, H., & Wang, X. (2014). Specific emitter identification based on Hilbert-Huang transform-based time-frequecy-energy distribution features. IET Communications,8(13), 2404–2412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haykin, S. (2008). Neural networks and learning machines. NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dorofki, M., Elshafie, A. H., & Jaafar, O., et al. (2012). Comparison of artificial neural network transfer functions abilities to simulate extreme runoff data. In Proceedings of international conference on environment, energy and biotechnology (Vol. 33, pp. 39–44).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaser Dalveren.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uzundurukan, E., Ali, A.M., Dalveren, Y. et al. Performance Analysis of Modular RF Front End for RF Fingerprinting of Bluetooth Devices. Wireless Pers Commun 112, 2519–2531 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07162-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07162-z

Keywords

Navigation