Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Estimation of Sparse Channel Using Bayesian Gaussian Mixture and CS-Aided Techniques for Pilot Contaminated Massive MIMO System

  • Published:
Wireless Personal Communications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Massive MIMO is established by future wireless communication systems to facilitate real-time user applications with having a higher of data transfer rates and spectral efficacy through perfect channel knowledge. Many pilot reuse schemes are working to improve channel performance regarding pilot overhead and channel knowledge. However, the pilot contamination becomes a major challenging issue in massive MIMO applications due to erroneous channel state information between neighboring cells. To tackle this issue, analyzing to the estimation of channel parameters in the preferred paths and interference from neighboring cells in the underdetermined system is essential. For estimating the channel behavior over Sparse Bayesian and Compressed sensing Aided methods are proposed by surviving the Pilot contamination effects by changing the angular to beam domain for sparse channel approximation. Simulation results have demonstrated the effectiveness of Bayesian and compressed sensing by compared with the standard estimators in connection with estimation accuracy, especially in pilot contamination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Larsson, E. G., & Tufvesson, F. (2014). Massive MIMO for next generation wireless systems. IEEE Communications Magazine, 52(2), 186–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Muller, R., Vehkapera, M., & Cottatellucci, L. (2013). Blind pilot decontamination. In Proceedings, ITG workshop on smart antennas, Stuttgart (pp. 1–6).

  3. Berger, C. R., Wang, Z., Huang, J., & Zhou, S. (November 2010). Application of compressive sensing to sparse channel estimation. IEEE Communications Magazine, 48(11), 164–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nguyen, S., & Ghrayeb, A. (2013). Compressive sensing-based channel estimation for massive multiuser MIMO systems. In Proceedings IEEE wireless communications and networking conference (WCNC 2013), Shanghai, China (pp. 2890–2895).

  5. Marzetta, T. L. (2010). Non-cooperative cellular wireless with unlimited numbers of base station antennas. IEEE Transactions, Wireless Communications, 9(11), 3590–3600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bajwa, W. U., Haupt, J., Sayeed, A. M., & Nowak, R. (2010). Compressed channel sensing: A new approach to estimating sparse multipath channels. Proceedings IEEE, 98(6), 1058–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Han, Y., Lee, J., & Love, D. J. (2017). Compressed sensing-aided downlink channel training for FDD massive MIMO systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 75(7), 2852–2862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carlin, M., Rocca, P., Oliveri, G., Viani, F., & Massa, A. (2013). Directions-of-arrival estimation through Bayesian compressive sensing strategies. IEEE Transactions, Antennas Propagation, 61(7), 3828–3838.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bayati, M., & Montanari, A. (February 2011). The dynamics of message passing on dense graphs, with applications to compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 57(2), 764–785.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Vila, J. P., & Schniter, P. (2013). Expectation-maximization Gaussian-mixture approximate message passing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 61, 4658–4672.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Wen, C. K., Jin, S., Wong, K. K., Chen, J. C., & Ting, P. (2014). Channel estimation for massive MIMO using Gaussian mixture Bayesian learning. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communication, 14(3), 1356–1368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rao, X., & Lau, V. K. N. (2015). Compressive sensing with prior support quality information and application to massive MIMO channel estimation with temporal correlation. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 63(18), 4914–4924.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Bjornson, E., et al. (2018). Massive MIMO networks: Spectral, energy, and hardware efficiency. Foundationsand Trends in Signal Processing, 11(3–4), 154–655.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Noh, S., & Zoltowski, M. D. (2014). Pilot beam pattern design for channel estimation in massive MIMO systems. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics Signal Processing, 8(5), 787–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoydis, J., Hoek, C., et al. (2012). Channel measurements for large antenna arrays. In Proceedings, IEEE international symposium on wireless communication systems (ISWCS’12), Paris, France (pp. 811–815).

  16. Pati, Y. C., Rezaiifar, R., & Krishna Prasad, P. S. (1993). Orthogonal matching pursuit: Recursive function approximation with applications to wavelet decomposition. In Proceedings, 27th annual Asilomar conference, signals, systems, and computers (pp. 40–44).

  17. Bandeira, A. S., Dobriban, E., Mixon, D. G., & Sawin, W. F. (2013). Certifying the restricted isometry property is hard. IEEE Transactions Information Theory, 59(6), 3448–3450.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Ledoit, O., & Wolf, M. (2004). A well-conditioned estimator for large dimensional covariance matrices. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 88, 365–411.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Ziniel, J., & Schniter, P. (2013). Dynamic compressive sensing of time-varying signals via approximate message passing. IEEE Signal Processing, 61(21), 5270–5284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ji, S., Xue, Y., & Carin, L. (2008). Bayesian compressive sensing. IEEE Transactions, Signal Processing, 56(6), 2346–2356.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Donoho, D. L., Maleki, A., & Montanari, A. (2009). Message passing algorithms for compressed sensing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(45), 18914–18919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Su, P., & Wang, Y. (2019). Channel estimation in massive MIMO systems using a modified Bayes-GMM method. Wireless Personal Communications, 107, 1521–1536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-019-06339-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of ECE, GITAM Institute of Technology, GITAM, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

    T. Ravi Babu & C. Dharma Raj

  2. Department of ECE, Vignan’s Institute of Engineering for Women, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India

    V. Adinarayana & K. Murali Krishna

Authors
  1. T. Ravi Babu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Dharma Raj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. Adinarayana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. Murali Krishna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Adinarayana.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ravi Babu, T., Dharma Raj, C., Adinarayana, V. et al. Estimation of Sparse Channel Using Bayesian Gaussian Mixture and CS-Aided Techniques for Pilot Contaminated Massive MIMO System. Wireless Pers Commun 117, 1387–1398 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07927-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07927-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation