Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Planetary rovers’ wheel–soil interaction mechanics: new challenges and applications for wheeled mobile robots

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Intelligent Service Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the increasing challenges facing planetary exploration missions and the resultant increase in the performance requirements for planetary rovers, terramechanics (wheel–soil interaction mechanics) is playing an important role in the development of these rovers. As an extension of the conventional terramechanics theory for terrestrial vehicles, the terramechanics theory for planetary rovers, which is becoming a new research hotspot, is unique and puts forward many new challenging problems. This paper first discusses the significance of the study of wheel–soil interaction mechanics of planetary rovers and summarizes the differences between planetary rovers and terrestrial vehicles and the problems arising thereof. The application of terramechanics to the development of planetary rovers can be divided into two phases (the R&D phase and exploration phase for rovers) corresponding to the high-fidelity and simplified terramechanics models. This paper also describes the current research status by providing an introduction to classical terramechanics and the experimental, theoretical, and numerical researches on terramechanics for planetary rovers. The application status of the terramechanics for planetary rovers is analyzed from the aspects of rover design, performance evaluation, planetary soil parameter identification, dynamics simulation, mobility control, and path planning. Finally, the key issues for future research are discussed. The current planetary rovers are actually advanced wheeled mobile robots (WMRs), developed employing cutting-edge technologies from different fields. The terramechanics for planetary rovers is expected to present new challenges and applications for WMRs, making it possible to develop WMRs using the concepts of mechanics and dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Home Page of NASA/JPL Mars Pathfinder. http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/MPF/

  2. Squyres SW, Knoll AH, Arvidson RE et al (2009) Exploration of Victoria crater by the Mars rover Opportunity. Science 324(5930): 1058–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Home Page of NASA/JPL Mars Exploration Rover Mission. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/home/index.html

  4. Volpe R (2005) Rover technology development and mission infusion beyond MER. In: Proceedings of IEEE Aerospace Conference, pp 971–981

  5. Winnendael M, Baglioni P, Elfving A, Ravera F, Clemmet J (2008) The ExoMars rover-overview of phase B1 results. In: Proceedings of the 9th iSAIRAS, Los Angeles, CA, USA

  6. Neal CR (2009) The Moon 35 years after Apollo: what’s left to learn?. Chem Erde Geochem 69(1): 3–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bekker MG (1960) Off-road locomotion: research and development in terramechanics. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang KJ (2002) Vehicle terramechanics. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nakashima H (2004) Discrete element method (DEM) and its possible application. In: Proceedings of SICE Annual Conference in Sapporo, Sapporo, Japan, pp 1104–1107

  10. Ren LQ, JIA Y, LI JQ et al (2005) Conceptual design of simulation experiment for lunar rover’s mobility performance. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Academic Conference of Deep Space Exploration Section of Chinese Society of Astronautics, Beijing, China, pp 458–466 (in Chinese)

  11. Sun G, Gao F, Li W (2007) Terramechanics and its application in planetary exploration. Adv Mech 37(3): 453–464 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sun G, Gao F, Li W (2005) Research contents and methods for terramechanics of deep space exploration vehicle. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Academic Conference of Deep Space Exploration Section of Chinese Society of Astronautics, Beijing, China, pp 445–451 (in Chinese)

  13. Craig J J (2004) Introduction to Robotics: mechanics and control, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xu YS, Kanade T (1993) Space robotics: dynamics and control. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  15. Siegwart R, Nourbakhsh IR (2004) Introduction to autonomous mobile robots. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tarokh M, Mcdermott G J (2005) Kinematics modeling and analyses of articulated rovers. IEEE Trans Robot 21(4): 539– 553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Howard T, Kelly A (2007) Optimal rough terrain trajectory generation for wheeled mobile robots. Int J Robot Res 26(2): 141–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wright J, Hartman F, Cooper B et al (2006) Driving on mars with RSVP: building safe and effective command sequences. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 2006(6): 37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Young K (2006) Mars rover escapes from the “Bay of Lamentation”. http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn9286-mars-rover-escapes-from-the-bay-of-lamentation.html

  20. Webster G, Brown D (2010) Now a stationary research platform, NASA’s Mars rover Spirit starts a new chapter in red planet scientific studies. http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/20100126a.html

  21. Chu CC, Hayati SA, Udomkesmalee S (2005) Mars base technology program overview. In: Proceedings of AIAA Space Conference and Exposition, Long Beach, CA, USA

  22. Apostolopoulos DS (2001) Analytical configuration of wheeled robotics locomotion. The Robotics Institute of Carnegie Mellon University Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-01-08

  23. Michaud S, Richter L, Thuer T et al (2006) Rover chassis evaluation and design optimization using the RCET. In: Proceedings of the 9th ESA Workshop on ASTRA, Noordwijk, The Netherlands

  24. Patel N, Ellery A, Allouis E et al (2004) Rover mobility performance evaluation tool (RMPET): a systematic tool for rover chassis evaluation via application of Bekker theory. In: Proceedings of the 8th ESA Workshop on ASTRA, Noordwijk, The Netherlands

  25. Iagnemma K, Kang S, Shibly H et al (2004) Online terrain parameter estimation for wheeled mobile robots with application to planetary rovers. IEEE Trans Robot 20(5): 921–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hutangkabodee S, Zweiri YH, Seneviratne LD et al (2006) Performance prediction of a wheeled vehicle on unknown terrain using identified soil parameters. In: Procedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Orlando, FL, USA, pp 3356–3361

  27. Krenn R, Gibbesch A, Hirzinger G (2008) Contact dynamics simulation of rover locomotion. In: Proceedings of the 9th i-SAIRAS, Los Angeles, CA, USA

  28. Sohl G, Jain A (2005) Wheel–terrain contact modeling in the ROAMS planetary rover simulation. In: Proceedings of ASME Int. Design Engineering Technical Conf. and Computers and Information in Engineering Conf., Long Beach, CA, USA

  29. Yoshida K, Asai H, Hamano H (2001) Motion dynamics of exploration rovers on natural terrain: experiments and simulation. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Field and Service Robotics, Helsinki, Finland, pp 281–286

  30. Krenn R, Hirzinger G (2008) Simulation of rover locomotion on sandy terrain-modeling, verification and validation. In: Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on ASTRA, Noordwijk, The Netherlands

  31. Lhomme-Desages D, Grand Ch, Maurette M (2008) Modeling of wheel–soil contact for the EDRES mobile robot simulator. In: Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on ASTRA, Noordwijk, The Netherlands

  32. Ishigami G, Miwa A, Nagatani K et al (2007) Terramechanics-based model for steering maneuver of planetary exploration rovers on loose soil. J Field Robot 24(3): 233–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Iagnemma K, Shibly H, Rzepniewski A et al (2001) Planning and control algorithms for enhanced rough-terrain rover mobility. In: Proceedings of the 6th i-SAIRAS, Montreal, Canada

  34. Ishigami G, Nagatani K, Yoshida K (2006) Path following control with slip compensation on loose soil for exploration rover. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Confernce on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Beijing, China, pp 5552–5557

  35. Ishigami G, Nagatani K, Yoshida K (2007) Path planning for planetary exploration rovers and its evaluation based on wheel slip dynamics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Roma, Italy, pp 2361–2366

  36. Bekker MG (1969) Introduction to terrain-vehicle. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhuang J (2002) Computational vehicle terramechanics. Press of Mechanical Industry, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Reece AR, Wong JY (1966) Soil failure beneath rigid wheels. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of ISTVS, Quebec, Canada, pp 425–445

  39. Onafeko O, Recce AR (1967) Soil stresses and deformations beneath rigid wheels. J Terramechanics 4(1): 59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wong JY, Reece AR (1967) Prediction of rigid wheel performance based on analysis of soil-stresses, part I: performance of driven rigid wheels. J Terramechanics 4(1): 81–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wong JY, Reece AR (1967) Prediction of rigid wheel performance based on analysis of soil-wheel stresses, part II: performance of towed rigid wheels. J Terramechanics 4(2): 7–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Miclethwait EWE (1944) Soil mechanics in relation to fighting vehicles. Military College of Science, Chetsey

    Google Scholar 

  43. Janosi Z, Hanamoto B (1961) Analytical determination of drawbar pull as a function of slip for tracked vehicle in deformable soils. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference of ISTVES, Torino, Italy, pp 707–726

  44. Chen BC (1981) Soil-vehicle system mechanics. China Agricultural Machine Press, Beijing (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Scholfield A, Wroth P (1968) Critical state soil mechanics. McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wanjii S, Hiroma T (1998) Prediction of wheel performance by analysis of normal and tangential stress distributions under the wheel soil interface. J Terramechanics 34(3): 165–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Perumpral JV, Lilzedahl JB, Perloff WH (1971) A numerical method for predicting the stress distribution and soil deformation under a tractor wheel. J Terramechanics 8(1): 9–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bekker MG (1956) Theory of land locomotion—the mechanics of vehicle mobility. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  49. Karafiath LL, Nowatzki EA (1978) Soil mechanics for off-road vehicle engineering. Trans Tech Publications, Clausthal

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wong JY (2008) Theory of ground vehicle, 4th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wong JY (1989) Terramechanics and off-road vehicles. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  52. MSC. Software Inc. (2007) ADAMS/tire user’s guide

  53. CMLabs Simulations Inc. (2005) VxVehicle developer guide 3

  54. AESCO (2003) Matlab/Simulink module AESCO soft soil tyre model (AS 2 TM) user’s guide

  55. Iagnemma K (2005) A Laboratory single wheel test-bed for studying planetary rover wheel–terrain interaction. Technical Report of MIT Field and Space Robotics Laboratory 01-05-05

  56. Shibly H, Iagnemma K, Dubowsky S (2005) An equivalent soil mechanics formulation for rigid wheels in deformable terrain, with application to planetary exploration rovers. J Terramechanics 2005(42): 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Brooks CA, Iagnemma K, Dubowsky S (2006) Visual wheel sinkage measurement for planetary rover mobility characterization. Auton Robot 2006(21): 55–64

    Google Scholar 

  58. Bauer R, Leung W, Barfoot T (2005) Experimental and simulation results of wheel–soil interaction for planetary rovers. In: Proceedings of 2005 IROS, Edmonton, Canada, pp 586–591

  59. Terrain sensing project page. http://web.mit.edu/mobility/research/terrain_sensing.html

  60. Brooks C, Iagnemma K (2009) Visual detection of novel terrain via two-class classification. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing Honolulu, Hawaii

  61. Brooks C, Iagnemma K, Dubowsky S (2005) Vibration-based terrain analysis for mobile robots. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, pp 3426–3431

  62. Halatci I, Brooks C, Iagnemma K (2008) Visual and tactile terrain classification and classifier fusion for planetary exploration rovers. Robotica 26(6): 767–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Iizuka K, Sato K, Kuroda Y, Kubota T (2006) Experimental study of wheeled forms for lunar rover on slope terrain. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, Istanbul, Turkey, pp 266–271

  64. Iizuka K, Sato Y, Kuroda Y et al (2006) Study on wheel of exploration robot on sandy terrain. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China, pp 4272–4277

  65. Home page of lunar/planetary exploration rover of Tohoku Univ. http://www.astro.mech.tohoku.ac.jp/~ishigami/rover/

  66. Yoshida K, Shiwa T (1996) Development of a research testbed for exploration rover at Tohoku University. J Space Tech Sci 12(1): 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ishigami G (2005) Locomotion mechanics for planetary exploration rovers based on steering characteristics. Master thesis of Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (in Japanese)

  68. Yoshida K, Watanabe T, Mizuno N et al (2003) Terramechanics-based analysis and traction control of a lunar/planetary rover. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Field and Service Robotics, Lake Yamanaka, Japan, pp 225–234

  69. Yoshida K, Ishigami G (2004) Steering characteristics of a rigid wheel for exploration on loose soil. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sendai, Japan, pp 3995–4000

  70. Yamana K (2005) Estimation of soil parameter using normal stress measuring wheel. Master thesis, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (in Japanese)

  71. Ikeda A (2009) A proposal of new traction force model for wheeled mobile robots on loose soil based on measurement of normal stress and slip. Master thesis, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (in Japanese)

  72. Chen B (2007) Research on traction characteristics of the rigid wheel with grousers on sandy soil. Master thesis, Jilin University, Changchun, China (in Chinese)

  73. Zou M, LI JQ, LI YW et al (2007) Prediction model and experimental study on the interaction of rigid wheel and lunar soil. Trans CSAE 23(12): 119–123 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Zou M, Zhang JH, Ren LQ et al (2009) Study on the traction performance for the driving wheel of lunar rover. J Astron 30(1): 98–103 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  75. Quan QQ (2007) Development and experiment of test-bed of wheel–soil interaction for lunar rover. Master thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China (in Chinese)

  76. Tao JG, Wang L, Wu FJ, Deng ZQ (2006) Mechanical analysis of wheel–soil interaction of lunar rove. J Mach Des Manuf 2006(12): 56–57 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  77. Tao JG, Quan QQ, Deng ZQ et al (2007) Analysis of wheel–soil interaction of rolling wheels with different diameter on a lunar rover. J Harbin Eng Univ 28(10): 1144–1149 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Tao JG, Hu M, Gao HB (2008) Modeling and measurement of rigid wheel–soil interaction for a lunar rover. Chin J Space Sci 28(4): 340–344 (in Chinese)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  79. Liu JC, Gao HB, Deng ZQ et al (2008) Effect of slip on tractive performance of small rigid wheel on loose sand. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5314(1): 1109–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Liu JC, Gao HB, Deng ZQ (2008) Effect of straight grousers parameters on motion performance of small rigid wheel on loose sand. Inf Tech J 7(8): 1125–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Ding L, Gao HB, Deng ZQ, Nagatani K, Yoshida K (2010) Experimental study and analysis on driving wheels’ mechanical performance for planetary exploration rovers moving in deformable soil. J Terramechanics, in press. doi:10.1016/j.jterra.2010.08.001

  82. Ding L, Gao HB, Deng ZQ, Liu RQ, Gao P (2009) Theoretical analysis and experimental research on wheel lug effect of lunar rover. J Astron 30(4): 48–56 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  83. Ding L, Gao HB, Deng ZQ, Liu JC, Tao JG (2009) Terramechanics model for wheel–terrain interaction of lunar rover based on stresses distribution. Chin J Mech Eng 45(7): 49–55 (in Chinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Ding L, Gao HB, Deng ZQ, Tao JG (2010) Wheel slip-sinkage and its prediction model of lunar rover. J Central South Univ Technol 17(1): 129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Ding L (2009) wheel–soil interaction terramechanics for lunar/planetary exploration rovers: modeling and application. Doctoral thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China (in Chinese)

  86. Nakashima H, Fujii H, Oida A et al (2007) Parametric analysis of lugged wheel performance for a lunar microrover by means of DEM. J Terramechanics 2007(44): 153–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Sun P, Gao F, JIA Y et al (2008) Discrete element simulation of interaction between rover wheel and lunar regolith. J Mach Des Manuf 2008(10): 75–77 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  88. Michaud S, Richter L, Patel N et al (2004) RCET: rover chassis evaluation tools. In: Proceedings of the 8th ESA Workshop on ASTRA, Noordwijk, The Netherlands

  89. Bauer R, Leung W, Barfoot T (2005) Development of a dynamic simulation tool for the Exomars rover. In: Proceedings of the 8th i-SAIRAS, Munich, Germany

  90. Miwa A (2005) Terarmechanics-based analysis on locomotion mechanics of lunar/planetary exploration rovers. Master thesis, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (in Japanese)

  91. Ishigami G, Miwa A, Yoshida K (2005) Steering trajectory analysis of planetary exploration rovers based on all-wheel dynamics model. In: Proceedings of the 8th i-SAIRAS, Munich, Germany

  92. Chen ZY (2007) Research of compound walking wheel having retractile laminas with application to lunar rover. Master thesis, Jilin University, Changchun, China (in Chinese)

  93. Li W, Gao F, Sun P (2006) Design of composite material wheel of planetary rover. J Jinlin Univ Eng Technol Ed 36(4): 502–505 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  94. Zhang P, Deng ZQ, Hu M et al (2008) Mobility performance analysis of lunar rover based on terramechanics. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE and ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechanism, Xi’an, China, pp 120–125

  95. Liu JC, Deng ZQ, Gao HB (2007) Research on wheel configuration for planetary rover. J Mach Des Manuf 2007(11): 209–211 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  96. Gromov V (1999) Physical and mechanical properties of lunar and planetary soils. Earth Moon Planets 1999(80): 51–72

    Google Scholar 

  97. Moore HJ, Clow GD, Hutton RE (1982) A summary of Viking sample trench analyses for angles of internal friction and cohesion. J Geophys Res 87(30): 10043–10050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. The Rover Team (1997) Characterization of the Martian surface deposits by the Mars Pathfinder rover Sojourner. Science 278(5344): 1765–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Arvidson RE, Anderson RC, Bartlett P et al (2004) Localization and physical property experiments conducted by Opportunity at Meridiani Planum. Science 306(5702): 1730–1733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Arvidson RE, Anderson RC, Haldemann AFC et al (2003) Physical properties and localization investigations associated with the 2003 Mars exploration rovers. J Geophys Res 108(E12): 8070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Arvidson RE, Anderson RC, Bartlett P et al (2004) Localization and physical properties experiments conducted by Spirit at Gusev Crater. Science 305(5685): 821–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Iagnemma K, Kang S, Brooks C, Dubowsky S (2003) Multi-sensor terrain estimation for planetary rovers. In: Proceedings of the 7th i-SAIRAS, Nara, Japan

  103. Hutangkabodee S, Zweiri YH, Seneviratne LD et al (2006) Soil parameter identification for wheel-terrain interaction dynamics and traversability prediction. Int J Autom Comput 2006(3): 244–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Deng ZQ, Ding L, Gao HB, Yoshida K, Nagatani K (2010) Influence of soil properties on lunar rover’s wheel–soil interaction mechanics. J Harbin Inst Technol (in press, in Chinese)

  105. Ding L, Yoshida K, Nagatani K, Gao HB, Deng ZQ (2009) Parameter identification for planetary soil based on decoupled analytical wheel–soil interaction terramechanics model, In: Proceedings of the 2009 IROS, St. Louis, MO, USA, pp 4122–4127

  106. Ding L, Gao HB, Deng ZQ, Tao JG (2010) Wheel–soil interaction mechanics model for lunar rover: decoupling and application. J Harbin Inst Technol (in press, in Chinese)

  107. Ding L, Gao HB, Deng ZQ, Song PL, Liu RQ (2008) Design of comprehensive high-fidelity/high-speed virtual simulation system for lunar rover. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics, Chengdu, China, pp 1118–1123

  108. Yen J, Jain A, Balaram J (1999) ROAMS: rover analysis modeling and simulation software. In: Proceedings of the 5th i-SAIRAS, Noordwijk, The Netherlands

  109. Jain A, Balaram J, Cameron J et al (2004) Recent developments in the ROAMS planetary rover simulation environment. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Montana, USA, pp 861–875

  110. Lamon P, Siegwart R (2005) Wheel torque control in rough terrain—modeling and simulation. In: Proceedings of 2005 ICRA, Barcelona, Spain, pp 867–872

  111. Lindemann RA, Bickler DB, Harrington BD et al (2006) Mars exploration rover mobility development—mechanical mobility hardware design, development and testing. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 13(2): 19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Tong G (2007) Study on simulation platform of lunar rover based on ADAMS. Master thesis, Jilin University, Changchun, China (in Chinese)

  113. Tao JG, Deng ZQ, Fang HT et al (2006) Development of a wheeled robotic rover in rough terrains. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, Dalian, China, pp 9272–9276

  114. Wang MY (2008) Research on lunar rover simulation in rough terrain. Master thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China (in Chinese)

  115. Yoshida K, Asai H, Hamano H (2001) Motion dynamics simulations and experiments of an exploration rover on natural terrain. In: Proceedings of the 6th i-SAIRAS, Montrl, Canada

  116. Ding L, Nagatani K, Sato K, Mora A, Yoshida K, Gao HB, Deng ZQ (2010) Terramechanics-based high-fidelity dynamics simulation for wheeled mobile robot on deformable rough terrain. In: Proceedings of 2010 ICRA, Anchorage, Alaska, USA, pp 4922–4927

  117. Iagnemma K, Dubowsky S (2000) Mobile robot rough-terrain control (RTC) for planetary exploration. In: Proceedings of the 26th Biennial Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Baltimore, MD, USA

  118. Iagnemma K, Dubowsky S (2004) Traction control of wheeled robotic vehicles in rough terrain with application to planetary rovers. Int J Robot Res 23(10–11): 1029–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Iagnemma K (2001) Rough-terrain mobile robot planning and control with application to planetary exploration. Doctoral thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

  120. Iagnemma K, Rzepniewski A, Dubowsky S et al (2003) Control of robotic vehicles with actively articulated suspensions. Auton Robot 2003(14): 5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Kewlani G, Iagnemma K (2008) A stochastic response surface approach to statistical prediction of mobile robot mobility. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IROS, Nice, France, pp 2234–2239

  122. Ishigami G, Kewlani G, Iagnemma K (2009) Predictable mobility . IEEE Robot Autom Mag 16(4): 61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Ishigami G, Kewlani G, Iagnemma K (2010) Statistical mobility prediction for planetary surface exploration rovers in uncertain terrain. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ICRA, Anchorage, Alaska, USA

  124. Lamon P, Krebs A, Lauria M et al (2004) Wheel torque control for a rough terrain rover. In: Proceedings of 2004 ICRA, New Orleans, LA, USA, pp 4682–4687

  125. Yoshida K, Hamano H (2002) Motion dynamics of a rover with slip-based traction model. In: Proceedings of 2002 ICRA, Washington, DC, USA, pp 3155–3160

  126. Yoshida K, Watanabe T, Mizuno N et al (2003) Slip, traction control, and navigation of a lunar rover. In: Proceedings of the 7th i-SAIRAS, Nara, Japan

  127. Yoshida K, Watanabe T, Mizuno N et al (2006) Terramechanics-based analysis and traction control of a lunar/planetary rover. Field and Service Robotics of Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics 2006(24): 225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Ishigami G, Miwa A, Yoshida K (2005) Steering trajectory analysis of planetary exploration rovers based on all-wheel dynamics model. In: Proceedings of the 8th i-SAIRAS, Munich, Germany

  129. Ishigami G (2008) Terramechanics-based analysis and control for lunar/planetary exploration robots. Doctoral thesis, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan

  130. Ishigami G, Nagatani K, Yoshida K (2009) Slope traversal controls for planetary exploration rover on sandy terrain. J Field Robot 26(3): 264–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Reina G, Ishigami G, Nagatani K, Yoshida K (2008) Vision-based estimation of slip angle for mobile robots and planetary rovers. In: Proceedings of 2008 ICRA, Pasadena, CA, USA, pp 2295–2300

  132. Ding L, Gao HB, Deng ZQ, Yoshida K, Nagatani K (2009) Slip ratio for lugged wheel of planetary rover in deformable soil: definition and estimation. In: Proceedings of 2009 IROS, St. Louis, MO, USA, pp 3343–3348

  133. Ding L, Gao HB, Deng ZQ, Liu Z (2010) Slip-ratio-coordinated control of planetary exploration robots traversing over deformable rough terrain. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Taipei, Taiwan, China, pp 4958–4963

  134. Yoshida K (2009) Achievements in space robotics. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 16(4): 20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Wang W (2002) Dynamics, control of a six-wheeled lunar rover locomotion system and its simulation technique. Doctoral thesis, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China (in Chinese)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China

    Liang Ding, Zongquan Deng & Haibo Gao

  2. Department of Aerospace Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, 980-8579, Japan

    Keiji Nagatani & Kazuya Yoshida

Authors
  1. Liang Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zongquan Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haibo Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Keiji Nagatani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kazuya Yoshida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haibo Gao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ding, L., Deng, Z., Gao, H. et al. Planetary rovers’ wheel–soil interaction mechanics: new challenges and applications for wheeled mobile robots. Intel Serv Robotics 4, 17–38 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-010-0080-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-010-0080-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation