Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

BADF: Bounding Volume Hierarchies Centric Adaptive Distance Field Computation for Deformable Objects on GPUs

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Computer Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a novel algorithm BADF (Bounding Volume Hierarchy Based Adaptive Distance Fields) for accelerating the construction of ADFs (adaptive distance fields) of rigid and deformable models on graphics processing units. Our approach is based on constructing a bounding volume hierarchy (BVH) and we use that hierarchy to generate an octree-based ADF. We exploit the coherence between successive frames and sort the grid points of the octree to accelerate the computation. Our approach is applicable to rigid and deformable models. Our GPU-based (graphics processing unit based) algorithm is about 20x–50x faster than current mainstream central processing unit based algorithms. Our BADF algorithm can construct the distance fields for deformable models with 60k triangles at interactive rates on an NVIDIA GTX GeForce 1060. Moreover, we observe 3x speedup over prior GPU-based ADF algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones M W, Bærentzen A, Srámek M. 3D distance fields: A survey of techniques and applications. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2006, 12(4): 581-599. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2006.56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones M W, Chen M. A new approach to the construction of surfaces from contour data. Computer Graphics Forum, 1994, 13(3): 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8659.1330075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu F, Kim Y J. Exact and adaptive signed distance fields computation for rigid and deformable models on GPUs. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2014, 20(5): 714-725. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Morton G M. A Computer Oriented Geodetic Data Base and a New Technique in File Sequencing. IBM Ltd., 1966.

  5. Frisken S F, Perry R N, Rockwood A P, Jones T R. Adaptively sampled distance fields: A general representation of shape for computer graphics. In Proc. the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, July 2000, pp.249-254. https://doi.org/10.1145/344779.344899.

  6. Krayer B, Müller S. Generating signed distance fields on the GPU with ray maps. The Visual Computer, 2019, 35(6/7/8): 961-971. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-019-01683-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jamriška O. Interactive ray tracing of distance fields. In Proc. the 14th Central European Seminar on Computer Graphics, May 2010.

  8. Mitchell N, Aanjaneya M, Setaluri R, Sifakis E. Nonmanifold level sets: A multivalued implicit surface representation with applications to self-collision processing. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2015, 34(6): Article No. 247. https://doi.org/10.1145/2816795.2818100.

  9. Calakli F, Taubin G. Ssd: Smooth signed distance surface reconstruction. Computer Graphics Forum, 2011, 30(7): 1993-2002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.02058.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoff K E, Keyser J, Lin M, Manocha D, Culver T. Fast computation of generalized Voronoi diagrams using graphics hardware. In Proc. the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, August 1999, pp.277-286. https://doi.org/10.1145/311535.311567.

  11. Kerwin T, Hittle B, Shen H W, Stredney D, Wiet G. Anatomical volume visualization with weighted distance fields. In Proc. Eurographics Workshop on Visual Computing for Biomedicine, July 2010, pp.117-124. https://doi.org/10.2312/VCBM/VCBM10/117-124.

  12. Frisken S F, Perry R N. Designing with distance fields. In Proc. the 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, July 30-August 3, 2006, pp.60-66. https://doi.org/10.1145/1185657.1185675.

  13. Bastos T, Celes W. GPU-accelerated adaptively sampled distance fields. In Proc. the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications, June 2008, pp.171-178. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMI.2008.4547967.

  14. Cao T T, Tang K, Mohamed A, Tan T S. Parallel banding algorithm to compute exact distance transform with the GPU. In Proc. the 2010 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics and Games, Feb. 2010, pp.83-90. https://doi.org/10.1145/1730804.1730818.

  15. Fischer I, Gotsman C. Fast approximation of high-order Voronoi diagrams and distance transforms on the GPU. Journal of Graphics Tools, 2006, 11(4): 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/2151237X.2006.10129229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsieh H H, Tai W K. A simple GPU-based approach for 3D Voronoi diagram construction and visualization. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2005, 13(8): 681-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2005.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rong G, Tan T S. Variants of jump flooding algorithm for computing discrete Voronoi diagrams. In Proc. the 4th International Symposium on Voronoi Diagrams in Science and Engineering, July 2007, pp.176-181. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISVD.2007.41.

  18. Wu X, Liang X, Xu Q, Zhao Q. GPU-based feature preserving distance field computation. In Proc. the 2008 International Conference on Cyberworlds, Sept. 2008, pp.203-208. https://doi.org/10.1109/CW.2008.62.

  19. Zhou K, Gong M, Huang X, Guo B. Data-parallel octrees for surface reconstruction. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2011, 17(5): 669-681. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2010.75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Karras T. Maximizing parallelism in the construction of BVHs, octrees, and k-d trees. In Proc. the 4th Eurographics Conference on High-Performance Graphics, June 2012, pp.33-37. https://doi.org/10.2312/EGGH/HPG12/033-037.

  21. Bédorf J, Gaburov E, Zwart S P. A sparse octree gravitational N-body code that runs entirely on the GPU processor. Journal of Computational Physics, 2012, 231(7): 2825-2839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2011.12.024.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Morrical N, Edwards J. Parallel quadtree construction on collections of objects. Computers & Graphics, 2017, 66: 162-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2017.05.024.

  23. Zhou K, Hou Q, Wang R, Guo B. Real-time KD-tree construction on graphics hardware. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2008, 27(5): Article No. 126. https://doi.org/10.1145/1409060.1409079.

  24. Sramek M, Kaufman A E. Alias-free voxelization of geometric objects. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 1999, 5(3): 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1109/2945.795216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Breen D E, Mauch S, Whitaker R T. 3D scan conversion of CSG models into distance volumes. In Proc. IEEE Symposium on Volume Visualization, Oct. 1998, pp.7-14. https://doi.org/10.1109/SVV.1998.729579.

  26. Kimmel R. Fast marching methods for computing distance maps and shortest paths. Technical Report, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1996. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7kx079v5, Nov. 2021.

  27. Yin K, Liu Y, Wu E. Fast computing adaptively sampled distance field on GPU. In Proc. the 19th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, Sept. 2011. https://doi.org/10.2312/PE/PG/PG2011short/025-030.

  28. Ségonne F, Pacheco J, Fischl B. Geometrically accurate topology-correction of cortical surfaces using nonseparating loops. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2007, 26(4): 518-529. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2006.887364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tang M, Wang T T, Liu Z Y, Tong R F, Manocha D. I-Cloth: Incremental collision handling for GPU-based interactive cloth simulation. ACM Transaction on Graphics, 2018, 37(6): Article No. 204. https://doi.org/10.1145/3272127.3275005.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Geometry, Image and Video Processing Enterprise Intelligent Computing, College of Computer Science and Technology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310007, China

    Xiao-Rui Chen, Min Tang, Cheng Li & Ruo-Feng Tong

  2. Geometric Algorithms for Modeling, Motion, and Animation Laboratory, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 20742, USA

    Dinesh Manocha

Authors
  1. Xiao-Rui Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Min Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cheng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dinesh Manocha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ruo-Feng Tong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiao-Rui Chen.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 66 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, XR., Tang, M., Li, C. et al. BADF: Bounding Volume Hierarchies Centric Adaptive Distance Field Computation for Deformable Objects on GPUs. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 37, 731–740 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-022-0331-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11390-022-0331-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation