Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Community-based learning: The core competency of residential, research-based universities

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditionally, universities focus primarily on instructionist teaching. Such an understanding has been criticized from theoretical and practical points of view. We believe that socio-cultural theories of learning and the concepts of social capital and social creativity hold considerable promise as a theoretical base for the repositioning of universities in the knowledge society. To illustrate our assumption, we provide case studies from the University of Colorado and the University of Siegen. These cases indicate how approaches to community-based learning can be integrated into a curriculum of applied computer science. We also discuss the role these didactical concepts can play within a practice-oriented strategy of regional innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, M., Pipek, V., & Wulf, V. (Eds.) (2003). Sharing expertise: Beyond knowledge management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Arias, E. G., Eden, H., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., & Scharff, E. (1999). Beyond access: Informed participation and empowerment. In C. Hoadley (Ed.), Proceedings of computer support for collaborative learning 1999. Designing new media for a new millennium: Collaborative technology for learning, education, and training (pp. 20–32). Palo Alto, CA.

  • Arias, E. G., Eden, H., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., & Scharff, E. (2000). Transcending the individual human mind—Creating shared understanding through collaborative design. ACM Transactions on Computer Human-interaction, 7(1), 84–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W., & Biederman, P. W. (1997). Organizing genius: The secrets of creative collaboration. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook for theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Duguid, P., & Haviland, S. (1994). Toward informed participation: Six scenarios in search of democracy in the information age. The Aspen Institute Quarterly, 6(4), 49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, D. M., & Leifer, L. J. (1999). Product-based learning in an overseas study program: The ME110K course. The second mudd design workshop—Designing design education for the 21st Century. Claremont, California: Harvey Mudd College, May 17–19, 1999. Available at <http://sll.stanford.edu/projects/me110k/HarveyMuddPaperAnnot.pdf>.

  • Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127–149). Washington, DC: APA Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D., & Prusak, L. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. C. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity-Flow and the psychology of discovery and inventio. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • dePaula, R., Fischer, G., & Ostwald, J. (2001). Courses as seeds: Expectations and realities. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 494–501). Maastricht, Netherlands: University of Maastricht.

  • Derry, S. J., & Fischer, G. (2005). Toward a model and theory for transdisciplinary graduate education. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. Available at: http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/~gerhard/papers/aera-montreal.pdf.

  • Duguid, P. (2003). Incentivising practise. Position paper for the Institute for Prospective Technological Studies of the European Commission, Workshop on "ICT and Social Capital in the Knowledge Society," Seville, Spain, November 2–3.

  • Duguid, P. (2005). The art of knowing: Social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community. The Information Society, 21, 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G. (1998). Creating the university of the 21st century: Cultural change and risk taking—Consequences of and reflections on teaching an experimental course. Unpublished manuscript. Available at: http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/~gerhard/reports/cu-risktaking1998.pdf.

  • Fischer, G. (2001). Communities of interest: Learning through the interaction of multiple knowledge Systems. In The 24th annual information systems research seminar in Scandinavia (pp. 1–14), Ulvik, Norway.

  • Fischer, G. (2002). Beyond ‘couch potatoes’: From consumers to designers and active contributors. In FirstMonday, Issue 7. Available at: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_12/fischer/.

  • Fischer, G. (2006). Distributed intelligence: Extending the power of the unaided, individual human mind. In A. Celentano (Ed.), Proceedings of the advanced visual interfaces (AVI) conference (pp. 7–14).New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., & Giaccardi, E. (2006). Meta-design: A framework for the future of enduser development. In H. Lieberman, F. Paternò, & V. Wulf (Eds.), End user development: Empowering people to flexibly employ advanced information and communication technology (pp. 421–452). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., & Ye, Y. (2005). Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. International journal of human–computer studies (IJHCS). Special Issue on Computer Support for Creativity, 63(4–5), 482–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., Scharff, E., & Ye, Y. (2004). Fostering social creativity by increasing social capital. In M. Huysman & V. Wulf (Eds.), Social capital and information technology (pp. 355–399). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (Eds.) (1991). Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Grow, G. O. (1991/1996). Teaching learners to be self-directed. Adult Education Quarterly, 41(3), 125–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsch, D. (2001). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human–computer interaction research. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Human–computer interaction in the new millennium (pp. 75–94). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huysman, M., & Wulf, V. (Eds.) (2004a). Social capital and information technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Huysman, M., & Wulf, V. (2004b). Social capital and IT—Current debates and research. In M. Huysman & V. Wulf (Eds.), Social capital and information technology (pp. 1–16). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Illich, I. (1971). Deschooling society. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D. H., & Mandl, H. (Eds.) (1990). Designing hypermedia for learning. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.

  • Kolmos, A., Fink, F. K., & Krogh, L. (Eds.) (2004). The Aalborg PBL model—progress, diversity and challenges, Aalborg University Press. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorden, J., & Slimowitz, J. (2003). NSF workshop examines the future of graduate education. CGS Communicator, 36(5), 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • L3D (2006). Center for lifeLong learning and design homepage. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Available at: http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/.

  • Mumford, E. (2000). Socio-technical design: An unfulfilled promise or a future opportunity. In A. Sloane & F. van Rijn (Eds.), Proceedings of the IFIP TC9 WG9.3 International Conference on Home Oriented Informatics and Telematics, "IF at Home: Virtual Influences on Everyday Life": Information, Technology and Society (pp. 45–60). Devender, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National-Research-Council (2003). Beyond productivity: Information technology, innovation, andcreativity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noam, E. M. (1995). Electronics and the dim future of the university. Science, 270(5234), 247–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norlin, G. (1935). Norlin’s speech on charge to the graduates. Available at http://ucblibraries.colorado.edu/about/norlin.htm.

  • Norman, D. (2001). In defense of cheating. Available at http://jnd.org/dn.mss/InDefenseOfCheating.html.

  • Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. (1993). The prosperious community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 13, 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H. (1984). Second-generation design methods. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology (pp. 317–327). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, B., Matsuov, E., & White, C. (1998). Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners. In D. R. Olsen & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development—New models of learning, teaching and schooling (pp. 388–414). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, M., Klamma, R., Jarke, M., & Wulf, V. (2007). Reality is our laboratory: Communities of practice in applied computer science. Behavior and Information Technology (BIT), 26(1), 81–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, M., Klamma, R., & Wulf, V. (2005). Establishing communities of practice among students and start-up companies. In T. Koschmann, D. D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL 2005. Computer support for collaborative learning: The Next 10 Years! (pp. 514–519). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G. (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. W. (2004). Pedagogical praxis: The professions as models for post-industrial education. Teachers College Record, 106(7), 1401–1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1996). The Sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. P. (1993). The two cultures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S., & Papert, S. (1991). Epistemological pluralism and the revaluation of the concrete. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 161–191). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • URAP (2006). Undergraduate research apprenticeship program. Available at: http://l3d.cs.colorado.edu/urap/.

  • Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice—Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for LifeLong Learning & Design (L3D), University of Colorado, Boulder, USA

    Gerhard Fischer

  2. Information Systems and New Media, University of Siegen, Siegen, Germany

    Markus Rohde & Volker Wulf

  3. International Institute for Socio-Informatics, Dorotheenstr. 76, 53111, Bonn, Germany

    Markus Rohde

  4. Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Systems (FhG-FIT), Sankt Augustin, Germany

    Volker Wulf

Authors
  1. Gerhard Fischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Markus Rohde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Volker Wulf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Rohde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fischer, G., Rohde, M. & Wulf, V. Community-based learning: The core competency of residential, research-based universities. Computer Supported Learning 2, 9–40 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9009-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9009-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation