Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Contextual perspective in analysing collaborative knowledge construction of two small groups in web-based discussion

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a methodology designed to explore the role of context in collaborative knowledge construction activity in asynchronous web-based discussion. The discussions of two student groups participating in a web-based teacher education course were compared. The comparison aimed to highlight the differences and similarities between the groups’ knowledge construction activity through studying the thematic structure, communicative functions and contextual resources used in their discussions. The results indicated that the different backgrounds of the two student groups influenced the way context was created and interpreted, and how meanings were negotiated. The differences and similarities between the groups’ activity illuminated the situated and mediated nature of learning. The possibilities of the methodology used in this study for evaluating collaborative knowledge construction in context are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Häkkinen, P., & Järvelä, S. (2007). Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context. Learning and Instruction, 17(4), 448–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliss, J., & Säljö, R. (1999). The human-technological dialectic. In J. Bliss, R. Säljö, & P. Light (Eds.), Learning sites: Social and technological resources of learning (pp. 1–16). Amsterdam: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttny, R. (1998). Putting prior talk into context: Reported speech and the reporting context. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31(1), 45–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. C., Lee, Y. W., Chu, H. J., Wang, H. R., & Jiang, H. M. (2005). Effective discussions, social talks and learning—A paradox on learning in discussion forums. In T. Koschmann, D. D. Suthers, & T-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL 2005. Computer support for collaborative learning: The Next 10 Years! (pp. 33–42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Crook, C. (1999). Computers in the community of classrooms. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers. Analysing productive interaction (pp. 102–117). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C., & Light, P. (1999). Information technology and the culture of student learning. In J. Bliss, R. Säljö, & P. Light (Eds), Learning sites: Social and technological resources of learning (pp. 183–193). Amsterdam: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (pp. 61–91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenbourg, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2007). Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., Bruhn, C., Gräsel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12(2), 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C., & Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds), Rethinking context: Language as interactive phenomenon (pp.1–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(4), 437–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (1996). Contextual inquiries: A discourse-oriented study of classroom activity. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning and schooling (pp. 104–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. (2003). Analyzing collaborative knowledge construction: Multiple methods for integrated understanding. Computers & Education, 41(4), 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen, R., Manninen, T., Järvelä, S., & Häkkinen, P. (2006). Learning to collaborate: Designing collaboration in a 3-D game environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 9(1), 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumpulainen, K., & Mutanen, M. (1999). The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: An introduction to an analytic framework. Learning and Instruction, 9(5), 449–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, C., & McCarthy, J. (2001). Reviewing the “Community of practice” metaphor: An analysis of control relations in a primary classroom. Mind, Culture and Activity, 8(2), 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue. Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 487–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in classroom. Learning and Instruction, 6(4), 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puntambekar, S. (2006). Analyzing collaborative interactions: Divergence, shared understanding and construction of knowledge. Computers & Education, 47, 332–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Säljö, R. (1999). Learning as the use of tools. A sociocultural perspective on the human–technology link. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers. Analysing productive interaction (pp. 144–161). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrire, S. (2006). Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis. Computers & Education, 46, 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2002). Rediscovering CSCL. In T. Koschmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 169–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2004). Building collaborative knowing. Elements of a social theory of CSCL. In P. Dillenbourg (Series Ed.) & J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner & R. L. Martens (Vol Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning, Vol 3. What we know about CSCL... and implementing it in higher education (pp. 53–85). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Stahl, G. (2006). Scripting group cognition: The problem of guiding situated collaboration. In F. Fischer, H. Kollar, I. Mandl, & J. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp.327–335). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valleala, U. M. (2006). Yhteinen ymmärtäminen koulutuksessa ja työssä. Kontekstin ymmärtäminen opiskelijaryhmän ja työtiimin keskusteluissa. [Shared understanding in education and work. Context of understanding in student group and work team discussions]. Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social research 280. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.

  • Van Boxtel, C. Van der Linden, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 10(4), 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2006). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46, 71–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. In L. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 85–100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Educational Research, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35, 40014, Jyväskylä, Finland

    Maarit Arvaja

Authors
  1. Maarit Arvaja
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maarit Arvaja.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arvaja, M. Contextual perspective in analysing collaborative knowledge construction of two small groups in web-based discussion. Computer Supported Learning 2, 133–158 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9013-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9013-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation