Skip to main content
Log in

Identity presence and knowledge building: Joint emergence in online learning environments?

  • Published:
International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the presence of identity in diverse online courses and explored how presence of identity correlated with content and students’ participation in online discussion and hence knowledge building in online educational spaces. Epistemic and participation data regarding online interaction and knowledge building were collected from a diverse group of students enrolled in seven multi-disciplinary online courses. Both qualitative and quantitative findings of the study suggested that online discussions with identity presence were associated with more follow-up participation and reinforced a more dialogic online interaction. Identity presence was also correlated with online interactions of knowledge sharing and egocentric elaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social identity theory. New York: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. C., Giesen, B., Munch, R., & Smelser, N. J. (Eds.). (1987). The micro-macro link. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amelung, C. (2007). Using social context and e-learner identity as a framework for an e-learning notification system. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(4), 501–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2). Retrieved March 13, 2010, from http://www.aln.org/alnweb/journal/jalnvol5issue2v2.htm

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Rabelais and his world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1940). The Philosophy of Literary Form. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhalter, B. (1999). Reading race online: Discovering racial identity in Usenet discussions. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in Cyberspace (pp. 60–75). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chester, A., & O’Hara, A. (2007). Image and identity in online discussions: The role of pseudonymity in education. International Journal of Learning, 13(12), 193–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutu, L. M. (2000). Communication codes of rationality and spirituality in the discourse of and about Robert S. McNamara’s in retrospect. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33(2), 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crichton, S., & Kinsel, E. (2003). Learning plans as support for the development of learner identity: A case study in rural western Canada. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 8(2), 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, P. A., & Uchida, Y. (1997). The negotiation of teachers’ sociocultural identities and practices in postsecondary EFL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 31(3), 451–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellinger, A. D., Watkins, K. E., & Marsick, V. J. (2005). Case study research methods. In R. A. Swanson & E. F. Holton III (Eds.), Research in organizations: Foundations and methods of inquiry (pp. 327–350). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1992). Communication and social change. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, F., & Weinberger, A. (2005). A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computer and Education, 46(1), 71–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M., & Bamford, A. (2004). Student choice of anonymity for learner identity in online learning discussion forums. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(3), 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. A., & Capper, J. M. (1999). Exploiting the web for education: An anonymous asynchronous role simulation. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 95–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison, R. D., Anderson, T., & Archer, T. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P., & Green, J. L. (1998). Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of Research in Education, 23, 119–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, J. F. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, C. N., Constance, A. L., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 397–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of an on-line discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28, 115–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden Papers (pp. 117–136). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirano, E. (2009). Learning difficulty and learner identity: A symbiotic relationship. ELT Journal, 63(1), 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social semiotics. Cornell University Press.

  • Howe, C., & Tolmie, A. (1999). Productive interaction in the context of computer-supported collaborative learning in science. In K. Littleton (Ed.), Learning with computers: Analyzing productive interaction (pp. 24–45). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G. (2007). Diversity, identity and belonging in e-learning communities: Some theories and paradoxes. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(5–6), 707–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, R. (1999). Affordances and constraints of electronic discussions. New Brunswick: ED454508.

  • Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanic, R. (1998). Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers & Education, 55(2), 808–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, F., & Xie, K. (2009). Toward deep learning for adult students in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 12(3–4), 136–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K., & Cicourel, A. V. (Eds.). (1981). Advances in Social Theory and Methodology. Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  • Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffey, J., Lin, G. Y., & Lin, Y. (2006). Assessing social ability in online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(2), 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. California: Sage Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marra, R. M., Moore, J. L., & Klimczak, A. K. (2006). Content analysis of online discussion forums: A comparative analysis of protocols. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, G. T. (1999). What's in a name? Some reflections on the sociology of anonymity. Information Society, 15, 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., & Hall, H. (2010). The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. A. (2010). A study of online discourse at The Chronicle of Higher Education. Innovative Higher Education, 35(3), 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michinov, N., Michinov, E., & Toczek-Capelle, M. C. (2004). Social identity, group processes and performances in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Group Dynamics Theory, Research and Practice, 8, 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. California: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichani, M. (2000). Differentiating between Communities of Practices (CoPs) and Quasi-Communities: Can CoPs exist online? International Journal on E-Learning, 1(3), 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, S., & O’Neill, S. (2008). Interactive media: The semiotics of embodied interaction. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35(4): 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallof, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis: An introduction. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulemon, L. P. (2008). Second Life: Personality - Identity - Avatars. In C. J. Bonk, M. M. Lee, & T. Reynolds (Eds.), World Conference on E-learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare and Higher Education: Proceedings E-Learn Las Vegas 2008 (pp. 3494–3498). Chesapeake: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H., Jr., & Grant, A. E. (2003). Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, M., & McClafferty, K. A. (2001). A call for the teaching of writing in graduate education. Educational Researcher, 30(7), 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, W. S. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging Internet. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. (2009). Dialogism. In P. Hühn, J. Pier, W. Schmid, & J. Schönert (Eds.), Handbook of Narratology (pp. 74–79). New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The Relationship of social presence and interaction in online Classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 16(3), 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., & Haslam, S. A. (2001). Social identity, organizations, and leadership. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 25–65). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. California.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Spencer Foundation [#200800124].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fengfeng Ke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ke, F., Chávez, A.F., Causarano, PN.L. et al. Identity presence and knowledge building: Joint emergence in online learning environments?. Computer Supported Learning 6, 349–370 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9114-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9114-z

Keywords

Navigation