Skip to main content
Log in

Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions Under Group Decision-Making Based on Similarity and Distance

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, a new method for aggregating fuzzy individual opinions into a group consensus opinion is proposed. To obtain the aggregation weights of each individual opinion, a consistency index of each expert with the other experts is introduced based on similarity and distance. The importance of each expert is also taken into consideration in the process of aggregation. Finally, a numerical example is presented to illustrate the efficiency of the procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Bardossy, L. Duckstein and I. Bogaradi, Combination of fuzzy numbers representing expert opinions, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1993, 57: 173–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Ishikawa, M. Amagasa, T. Shiga, G. Tomizawa, R. Tatsuta and H. Mieno, The max-min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1993, 55: 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Nurmi, Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1981, 6: 249–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi, A soft measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences, European Journal of Operational Research, 1988, 34: 315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Kacprzyk, M. Fedrizzi and H. Nurmi, Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1992, 49: 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Fedrizzi and J. Kacprzyk, On measuring consensus in the setting of fuzzy preference relations, in Non-conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making (ed. by J. Kacprzyk and M. Roubens), Springer, Berlin, 1988, 129–141.

  7. R. N. Xu and X. Y. Zhai, Extensions of the analytic hierarchy process in fuzzy environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1992, 52: 251–257.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. M. Hsu and C. T. Chen, Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996, 79: 279–285.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. S. Lee, Optimal consensus of fuzzy opinions under group decision making environment, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2002, 132: 303–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Zwick, E. Carlstein and D. V. Budescu, Measures of similarity among fuzzy concepts: A comparative analysis, Internat, J. Approximate Reasoning, 1987, 1: 221–242.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Kauffman and M. M. Gupta, Introduction to Fuzzy Arithmetic: Theory and Applications, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Dubois, E. Kerre and R. Mesiar, Fuzzy interval analysis, in Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets (ed. by D. Dubois and H. Prade), The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2000, 483–581.

  13. S. Heilpern, Representation and application of fuzzy numbers, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1997, 91: 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. M. Tong and P. P. Bonissone, A linguistic approach to decision making with fuzzy sets, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet, 1980, 10: 716–723.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Kacprzyk, Multistage Fuzzy Control, Wiley Chichester, 1997.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongxing Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, C., Lan, J. & Wang, Z. Aggregation of Fuzzy Opinions Under Group Decision-Making Based on Similarity and Distance. Jrl Syst Sci & Complex 19, 63–71 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-006-0063-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-006-0063-y

Key Words

Navigation