Skip to main content
Log in

Proper reparametrization for inherently improper unirational varieties

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a class of lattice supports in the lattice space Z m is found to be inherently improper because any rational parametrization from C m to C n defined on such a support is improper. The improper index for such a lattice support is defined to be the gcd of the normalized volumes of all the simplex sub-supports. The structure of an improper support S is analyzed and shrinking transformations are constructed to transform S to a proper one. For a generic rational parametrization RP defined on an improper support S, we prove that its improper index is the improper index of S and give a proper reparametrization algorithm for RP. Finally, properties for rational parametrizations defined on an improper support and with numerical coefficients are also considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Farin, J. Hoschek, and M. S. Kim, Handbook of CAGD, Elsevier, North Holland, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. W. Chionh and R. N. Goldman, Degree, multiplicity and inversion formulas for rational surfaces using U-resultants, Computer Aided Geometric Design, 1992, 9(2): 93–108.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. O. Zariski, Algebraic Surfaces, Springer, Berlin, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Van der Waerden, B. L. Einfürung in Die Algebaischen Geometrie, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. Y. Shen and C. M. Yuan, Implicitization using univariate resultants, Journal of Systems Science & Complexity, 2010, 23(4): 804–814.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. R. J. Walker, Algebraic Curves, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1950.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. T. W. Sederberg, Improperly parameterized rational curves, Computer Aided Geometric Design, 1986, 3(1): 67–75.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Abhyankar and C. Bajaj, Automatic Parameterization of Rational Curves and Surfaces III: Algebraic Plane Curves, Computer Aided Geometric Design, 1988, 5(4): 309–321.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. X. S. Gao and S. C. Chou, Implicitization of rational parametric equations, Journal of Symbolic Computation, 1992, 14(5): 459–470.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Perez-Diaz, On the problem of proper reparametrization for rational curves and surfaces, Computer Aided Geometric Desig, 2006, 23(4): 307–323.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Castelnuvo, Sulla rationalita della involuzioni pinae, Mathematische Annalen, 1894, 44: 125–155.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Artin and D. Mumford, Some elementary examples of unirational varieties which are nonrational, Proc. London Math. Soc., 1972, 25(3): 75–95.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Schinzel, Polynomials with Special Regard to Reducibilit, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Li and X. S. Gao, The proper reparametrization of a special class of rational parametric equations, Jouranl of Systems Science & Complexity, 2006, 19(3): 331–339.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Li, L. Y. Shen, and X. S. Gao, Proper reparametrization of rational ruled surface, Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2008, 23(2): 290–297.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. E. W. Chionh, X. S. Gao, and L. Y. Shen, Inherently improper surface parametric supports, Computer Aided Geometric Design, 2006, 23(8): 629–639.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Pohst, A modification of the LLL reduction algorithm, Journal of Symbolic Computation, 1987, 4(1): 123–127.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Cohen, A Course in Computational Algebraic Number Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. K. Lenstra, H. W. Lenstra, and L. Lovász, Factoring polynomials with rational coefficients, Mathematische Annalen, 1982, 261: 515–534.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Q. Nguyen, Can we trust cryptographic software? Proceedings of Eurocrypt’04, C. Cachin and J. Camenisch (eds.), LNCS, 2004, 3027: 555–570.

  21. D. Cox, J. Little, and D. O’shea, Using Algebraic Geometry, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Y. Li and X. S. Wang, The BKK root count in C n, Mathematics of Computation, 1996, 65(216): 1477–1484.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. W. T. Wu, Mathematics Mechanization, Scinece/Kluwer Press, Beijing, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liyong Shen.

Additional information

This research is supported by the National Key Basic Research Project of China under Grant No. 2011CB302400 and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 10901163.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor Ziming LI.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shen, L., Chionh, E., Gao, XS. et al. Proper reparametrization for inherently improper unirational varieties. J Syst Sci Complex 24, 367–380 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-010-7221-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-010-7221-y

Key words

Navigation