Skip to main content
Log in

Continuous auxiliary covariate in additive hazards regression for survival data

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the additive hazards regression analysis by utilizing continuous auxiliary covariate information to improve the efficiency of the statistical inference when the primary covariate is ascertained only for a randomly selected subsample. The authors construct a martingale-based estimating equation for the regression parameter and establish the asymptotic consistency and normality of the resultant estimators. Simulation study shows that the proposed method can greatly improve the efficiency compared with the estimator which discards the auxiliary covariate information in a variety of settings. A real example is also provided as an illustration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cox D R, Regression models and life-tables, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 1972, 34: 187–202.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Prentice R L, Covariate measurement errors and parameter estimation in a failure time regression model, Biometrika, 1982, 69: 331–342.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Pepe M S and Fleming T R, A nonparametric method for dealing with mismeasured covariate data, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1991, 86: 108–113.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin D Y and Ying Z, Cox regression with incomplete covariate measurements, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1993, 88: 1341–1349.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou H and Pepe M S, Auxiliary covariate data in failure time regression analysis, Biometrika, 1995, 82: 139–149.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou H and Wang C, Failure time regression with continuous covariates measured with error, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 2000, 62: 657–665.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Greene W F and Cai J, Measurement error in covariate in the marginal hazards model for multivariate failure time data, Biometrics, 2004, 60: 987–996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu Y, Wu Y, and Zhou H, Multivariate failure times regression with a continuous auxiliary covariate, Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 2010, 101: 679–691.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu Y, Zhou H, and Cai J, Estimated pseudopartial-likelihood method for correlated failure time data with auxiliary covariates, Biometrics, 2009, 65: 1184–1193.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Breslow N E and Day N E, Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, The Design and Analysis of Case-Control Studies, Lyon, IARC, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Breslow N E and Day N E, Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies, Lyon, IARC, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cox D R and Oakes D, Analysis of Survival Data, Chapman and Hall, London, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas D C, Use of auxiliary information in fitting nonproportional hazards models, in Modern Statistical Methods in Chronic Disease Epidemiology (ed. by Moolgavkar S H and Prentice R L), Wiley, New York, 1986, 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lin D Y and Ying Z, Semiparametric analysis of the additive risk model, Biometrika, 1994, 81: 61–71.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. O’Neill T J, Inconsistency of the misspecified proportional hazards model, Statistics and Probability Letters, 1986, 4: 219–222.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kulich M and Lin D Y, Additive hazards regression with covariate measurement error, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2000, 95: 238–248.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang J and Zhou H, Additive hazard regression with auxiliary covariates, Biometrika, 2007, 92: 359–369.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Rubin D B, Inference and missing data, Biometrika, 1976, 63: 581–592.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Fleming T R and Harrinton D P, Counting Processes and Survival Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Breslow N E, Discussion of paper of D. R. Cox, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 1972, 34: 216–217.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Aalen O O, A linear regression model for the analysis of life times, Statistics in Medcine, 1989, 8: 907–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nadaraya E A, On estimating regression, Theory of Probability and Its Applications, 1964, 10: 186–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Watson G S, Smooth regression analysis, Sankya, Series A, 1964, 26: 359–372.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Kosorok M R, Introduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference, Springer, New York, 2008.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Yin G, Li H, and Zeng D, Partially linear additive hazards regression with varying coefficients, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2008, 103: 1200–1213.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Andersen P K and Gill R D, Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study, The Annals of Statistics, 1982, 10: 1100–1120.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Foutz R V, On the unique consistent solution to likelihood equations, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1977, 72: 147–148.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Eubank R L, Smoothing Spline and Nonparametric Regression, Dekker, New York, 1988.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Dickson E R, Grambsch P M, Fleming T R, Fisher L D, and Langworthy A, Prognosis in primary biliary cirrhosis: Model for decision making, Hepatology, 1989, 10: 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Markus B H, Dickson E R, Grambsch P M, Fleming T R, Mazzaferro V, Klintmalm G B, Wiesner R H, Van Thiel D H, and Starzl T E, Efficiency of liver transplantation in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis, The New England Journal of Medicine, 1989, 320: 1709–1713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang J H, Zhou J, and Li Y, Variable selection for censored quantile regresion, Statistica Sinica, 2013, 23: 145–167.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoping Shi.

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 11171263, 41261087, and the Doctoral Fund of Ministry of Education of China under Grant Nos. 20110141110004, 20110141120004.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor SUN Liuquan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, X., Liu, Y. & Wu, Y. Continuous auxiliary covariate in additive hazards regression for survival data. J Syst Sci Complex 27, 1247–1262 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-014-3010-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-014-3010-3

Keywords

Navigation