Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sliding-mode-control based robust guidance algorithm using only line-of-sight rate measurement

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Robust guidance algorithm using only line-of-sight rate measurement is proposed for the interceptor with passive seeker. The initial relative distance, initial closing velocity and their error boundaries are employed to obtain their estimations according to the interceptor-target relative kinematics. A robust guidance law based on sliding mode control is formulated, in which the boundary of target maneuver is needed and the chattering phenomenon inevitably exists. In order to address the defects above, an estimation to the boundary of the target acceleration is proposed to improve the robust guidance law and the Lyapunov stability analysis is included. The main feature of the robust guidance algorithm is that it reduces the influence of the relative distance, the closing velocity and the target maneuver on the interception and enhances the effect of line-of-sight rate. With two worst conditions of initial measured distance and initial measured closing velocity, performances of the proposed guidance laws are verified via numerical simulations against different target maneuvers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zarchan P, Tactical and Strategic Missile Guidance, AIAA Press, Reston, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Asher J and Yaesh I, Advances in Missile Guidance Theory, AIAA Press, Reston, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li X and Jikov V, Survey of maneuvering target tracking. Part V. multiple-model methods, IEEE Trans. Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2005, 41(4): 1255–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Song T, Observability of target tracking with bearings-only measurements, IEEE Trans. Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 1996, 32(4): 1468–1472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhou D, Mu C, and Xu W, Adaptive sliding-mode guidance of a homing missile, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1999, 22(4): 589–594.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhou D, Mu C, Ling Q, et al, Optimal sliding-mode guidance of a homing-missile, Proceedings of 38th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (eds. by Kamen E W and Cassandras C), Phoenix, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou D and Mu C, Motion tracking sliding-mode guidance of a homing missile with bearingsonly measurements, Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 2000, 43(141): 130–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou D, Zhang Y A, and Duan G R, Multiple model adaptive two-step filter and motion tracking sliding-mode guidance for missiles with time lag in acceleration, Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 2004, 47(156): 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hou Z, Su M, Wang Y, et al, A fuzzy optimal sliding-mode guidance for intercepting problem, Proceedings of IFAC World Congress (ed. by Camisani F), Cape Town, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhou D, Sun S, Zhou J Y, et al, A discrete sliding-mode guidance law, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 2015, 137(2): 024501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Idan M, Shima T, and Golan O M, Integrated sliding mode autopilot-guidance for dual-control missiles, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2007, 30(4): 1081–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shtessel Y B, Shkolnikov I A, and Levant A, Smooth second-order sliding modes: Missile guidance application, Automatica, 2007, 43(8): 1470–1476.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Shtessel Y B, Shkolnikov I A, and Levant A, Guidance and control of missile interceptor using second-order sliding modes, IEEE Trans. Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2009, 45(1): 110–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shtessel Y B and Tournes C H, Integrated higher-order sliding mode guidance and autopilot for dual control missiles, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2009, 32(1): 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kada B, Arbitrary-order sliding-mode-based homing-missile guidance for intercepting highly maneuverable targets, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37(6): 1999–2013.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harl N and Balakrishnan S N, Impact time and angle guidance with sliding mode control, IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology, 2012, 20(6): 1436–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar S R, Rao S, and Ghose D, Sliding-mode guidance and control for all-aspect interceptors with terminal angle constraints, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2012, 35(4): 1230–1246.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar S R, Rao S, and Ghose D, Non-singular terminal sliding mode guidance and control with terminal angle constraints for non-maneuvering targets, Proceedings of 12th IEEE Workshop on Variable Structure Systems (ed. by Bandyopadhyay B), Mumbai, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kumar S R, Rao S, and Ghose D, Nonsingular terminal sliding mode guidance with impact angle constraints, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2014, 37(4): 1114–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shima T, Idan M, and Golan O M, Sliding-mode control for integrated missile autopilot guidance, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2006, 29(2): 250–260.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Koren A, Idan M, and Golan O M, Integrated sliding mode guidance and control for missile with on-off actuators, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2008, 31(1): 204–214.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Slotine J and Li W, Applied Nonlinear Control, Prentice hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Wheeler G, Su C, and Stepanenko Y, A sliding mode controller with improved adaptation laws for the upper bounds on the norm of uncertainties, Automatica, 1998, 34(2): 1657–1661.

  24. Yoo D and Chung M, A variable structure control with simple adaptation laws for upper bounds on the norm of the uncertainties, IEEE Trans. Automatic Control, 2002, 37(6): 860–865.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Nesline F W and Zarchan P, A new look at classical vs modern homing missile guidance, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 1981, 4(1): 78–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mehrandezh M, Sela N M, Fenton R G, et al, Robotic interception of moving objects using an augmented ideal proportional navigation guidance technique, IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 2000, 30(3): 238–250.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lin Z, An overview of the development of low gain feedback and low-and-high gain feedback, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2009, 22(4): 697–721.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Wei A, Wang Y, and Hu X, Parallel simultaneous stabilization of a set of port-controlled Hamiltonian systems subject to actuator saturation, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2011, 24(1): 120–139.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou B, Duan G, and Kong H, Global stabilization of linear systems with bounded controls using state-dependent saturation functions, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2011, 24(3): 477–490.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Ni W and Cheng D, Stabilization of switched linear systems with constrained inputs, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2012, 25(1): 60–70.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100083, China

    Jian Chen

  2. Beijing Institute of Space Long March Vehicle, Beijing, 100076, China

    Yuan Tian

  3. Halliburton Energy Services Inc., Houston, 77032, USA

    Peng Li

  4. Science and Technology on Aircraft Control Laboratory, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Beijing, 100191, China

    Qingdong Li & Zhang Ren

Authors
  1. Jian Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuan Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qingdong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhang Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Chen.

Additional information

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61333011, 61421063, and 61433011.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor CHEN Benmei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J., Tian, Y., Li, P. et al. Sliding-mode-control based robust guidance algorithm using only line-of-sight rate measurement. J Syst Sci Complex 29, 1485–1504 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-016-5013-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-016-5013-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation