Skip to main content
Log in

Bayesian empirical likelihood estimation of quantile structural equation models

  • Published:
Journal of Systems Science and Complexity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Structural equation model (SEM) is a multivariate analysis tool that has been widely applied to many fields such as biomedical and social sciences. In the traditional SEM, it is often assumed that random errors and explanatory latent variables follow the normal distribution, and the effect of explanatory latent variables on outcomes can be formulated by a mean regression-type structural equation. But this SEM may be inappropriate in some cases where random errors or latent variables are highly nonnormal. The authors develop a new SEM, called as quantile SEM (QSEM), by allowing for a quantile regression-type structural equation and without distribution assumption of random errors and latent variables. A Bayesian empirical likelihood (BEL) method is developed to simultaneously estimate parameters and latent variables based on the estimating equation method. A hybrid algorithm combining the Gibbs sampler and Metropolis-Hastings algorithm is presented to sample observations required for statistical inference. Latent variables are imputed by the estimated density function and the linear interpolation method. A simulation study and an example are presented to investigate the performance of the proposed methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jöreskog K G, A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system, Eds. by Goldberger E S and Duncan O D, Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, Seminar Press, New York, 1973, 85–112.

  2. Jöreskog K G and Sörbom D, LISREL 8: Structural Equation Moldeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, Scientific Software International, Hove adn London, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Skrondal A and Rabe-Hesketh S, Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal and Structural Equation Models, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2004.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee S Y, Structural Equation Modeling: A Bayesian Approach, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2007.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang Y F, Feng X N, and Song X Y, Bayesian quantile structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2016, 23: 246–258.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee S Y and Zhu H, Maximum likelihood estimation of nonlinear structural equation models. Psychometrika, 2002, 67: 189–210.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee S Y and Tang N S, Analysis of nonlinear structural equation models with nonignorable missing covaariates and ordered categorical data. Statistica Sinica, 2006, 16: 1117–1141.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cai J H, Song X Y, and Hser Y I, A Bayesian analysis of mixture structural equation models with nonignorable missing responses and covariates, Statistics in Medicine, 2010, 29: 1861–1874.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Song X Y, Lu Z, Hser Y I, et al., A Bayesian approach for analyzing longitudinal structural equation models, Structural Equation modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2011, 18: 183–194.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo R X, Zhu H T, Chow S M, et al., Bayesian lasso for semiparametric structural equation models, Biometrics, 2012, 68: 567–577.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Koenker R, Quantile Regression, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2005.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu K and Moyeed R A, Bayesian quantile regression. Statistics & Probability Letters, 2001, 54: 437–447.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Dunson D B and Taylor J A, Approximate Bayesian inference for quantiles. Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, 2005, 17: 385–400.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Kottas A and Krnjajić M, Bayesian semiparametric modelling in quantile regression. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 2009, 36: 297–319.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Reich B J, Bondell H D, and Wang H J, Flexible Bayesian quantile regression for independent and clustered data. Biostatistics, 2010, 11: 337–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lancaster T and Sung J J, Bayesian quantile regression methods. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2010, 25: 287–307.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang Y and He X, Bayesian empirical likelihood for quantile regression. The Annals of Statistics, 2012, 40: 1102–1131.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Feng X N, Wang G C, Wang Y F, et al., Structure detection of semiparametric structural equation models with bayesian adaptive group lasso, Statistics in Medicine, 2015, 34: 1527–1547.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Lazar N A, Bayesian empirical likelihood. Biometrika, 2003, 90: 319–326.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Schennach S, Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood. Biometrika, 2005, 92: 31–46.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Fang K T and Mukerjee R, Empirical-type likelihoods allowing posterior credible sets with frequentist validity: Higher-order asymptotics. Biometrika, 2006, 93: 723–733.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang I H and Mukerjee R, Bayesian and frequentist confidence intervals arising from empiricaltype likelihoods. Biometrika, 2008, 95: 139–147.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Mukerjee R, Data-dependent probability matching priors for empirical and related likelihoods, Pushing the Limits of Contempo-rary Statistics: Contributions in Honor of Jayanta K. Ghosh, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2008, 3: 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Grendár M and Judge G, Asymptotic equivalence of empirical likelihood and bayesian map. The Annals of Statistics, 2009, 37: 2445–2457.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Rao J and Wu C, Bayesian pseudo-empirical-likelihood intervals for complex surveys. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 2010, 72: 533–544.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Chaudhuri S and Ghosh M, Empirical likelihood for small area estimation. Biometrika, 2011, 98: 473–480.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Song X Y and Lee S Y, Basic and Advanced Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling: With Applications in the Medical and Behavioral Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, 2012.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Owen A B, Empirical Likelihood, Chapman & Hall, New York, 2001.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Wei Y, Ma Y Y, and Carroll R J, Multiple imputation in quantile regression. Biometrika, 2012, 99: 423–438.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen J, Sitter R R, and Wu C, Using empirical likelihood methods to obtain range restricted weights in regression estimators for surveys. Biometrika, 2002, 89: 230–237.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Gelman A, Inference and Monitoring Convergence in Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice, Chapman & Hall, London, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Niansheng Tang.

Additional information

The paper was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 11165016.

This paper was recommended for publication by Editor SHAO Jun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Tang, N. Bayesian empirical likelihood estimation of quantile structural equation models. J Syst Sci Complex 30, 122–138 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-017-6254-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-017-6254-x

Keywords

Navigation