Skip to main content
Log in

RRM: An incentive reputation model for promoting good behaviors in distributed systems

  • Published:
Science in China Series F: Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reputation systems represent soft security mechanisms that complement traditional information security mechanisms. They are now widely used in online e-commerce markets and communities in order to stimulate good behaviors as well as to restrain adverse behaviors. This paper analyzes the limitations of the conversational reputation models and proposes an incentive reputation model called the resilient reputation model (RRM) for the distributed reputation systems. The objective of this reputation model is not only to encourage the users to provide good services and, therefore, to maximize the probability of good transaction outcomes, but also to punish those adverse users who are trying to manipulate the application systems. The simulation results indicate that the proposed reputation model (RRM) could effectively resist against the common adverse behaviors, while protecting the profits of sincere users from being blemished by those adversaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chrysanthos D. Reputation mechanism mesign in online trading environments with pure moral hazard. Inf Syst Res, 2005, 16(2): 209–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kevin W, Emin G S. Experience with an object reputation system for peer-to-peer filesharing. In: NSDI’06: Proceedings of the 3rd conference on 3rd Symposium on Networked Systems Design & Implementation, Berkeley, CA, USA. USENIX Association, 2006, 1–14

  3. Luke T, Jigar P, Nicholas R, et al. TRAVOS: Trust and reputation in the context of inaccurate information sources. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst, 2006, 12(2): 183–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Resnick P, Kuwabara K, Zeckhauser R, et al. Reputation systems. Commun ACM, 2000, 43(12): 45–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Josang A, Ismail R, Boyd C. A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Dec Supp Syst, 2007, 43(2): 618–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang E, Dillon T S, Hussain F K. Trust and reputation relationships in service-oriented environments. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ICITA 2005). Sydney: IEEE, 2005. 4–14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Jurca R, Faltings. An Incentive compatible reputation mechanism. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce, 2003. 285–292

  8. Trung D H, Nicholas R J, Nigel R S. An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst, 2006, 13(2): 119–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marti S, Garcia M H. Taxonomy of trust: categorizing p2p reputation systems. Comp Netw, 2006, 50(4): 472–484

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiong L, Liu L. PeerTrust: Supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Engin, 2004, 16(7): 843–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abdul-Rahman A, Hailes S. A distributed trust model. In: Proceedings of New Security Paradigms Workshop. New York: ACM, 1997. 48–60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Papaioannou T G, Stamoulis G D. Effective use of reputation in peer-to-peer environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, 2004. 259–268

  13. Jurca R, Faltings B. Towards incentive-compatible reputation management. Trust Reput Secur, AAMAS Int Workshop, 2002. 138–147

  14. Josang A, Ismail R. The beta reputation system. In: Proceedings of the 15th Bled Conference on Electronic Commerce, 2002. 324–337

  15. eBay. The world’s online marketplace, http://www.ebay.com

  16. Resnick P, Zeckhauser R, Swanson J, et al. The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Exp Econ, 2006, 9(2): 79–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Houser D, Wooders J. Reputation in auctions: Theory and evidence from eBay. J Econ Managt Strat, 2007, 15(2): 353–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dellarocas C. Efficiency and robustness of eBay-like online feedback mechanisms in environments with moral hazard. Working paper, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2003

  19. Repast 3: Recursive porous agent simulation toolkit. Version 3. http://repast.sourceforge.net

  20. North M J, Collier N T, Vos J R. Experiences creating three implementations of the repast agent modeling toolkit. ACM Trans Model Comp Simul, 2006, 16(1): 1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rasmusson L, Jansson S. Simulated social control for secure internet commerce. New Security Paradigms Workshop, New York: ACM, 1996. 18–26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Zhang.

Additional information

Supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (Grant No. 2003CB314800), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 60203044) and the 242 Program (Grant No. (242)2007A07)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, H., Duan, H. & Liu, W. RRM: An incentive reputation model for promoting good behaviors in distributed systems. Sci. China Ser. F-Inf. Sci. 51, 1871–1882 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-008-0141-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-008-0141-y

Keywords

Navigation