Skip to main content
Log in

Robust low-rank tensor factorization by cyclic weighted median

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low-rank tensor factorization (LRTF) provides a useful mathematical tool to reveal and analyze multi-factor structures underlying data in a wide range of practical applications. One challenging issue in LRTF is how to recover a low-rank higher-order representation of the given high dimensional data in the presence of outliers and missing entries, i.e., the so-called robust LRTF problem. The L 1-norm LRTF is a popular strategy for robust LRTF due to its intrinsic robustness to heavy-tailed noises and outliers. However, few L 1-norm LRTF algorithms have been developed due to its non-convexity and non-smoothness, as well as the high order structure of data. In this paper we propose a novel cyclic weighted median (CWM) method to solve the L 1-norm LRTF problem. The main idea is to recursively optimize each coordinate involved in the L 1-norm LRTF problem with all the others fixed. Each of these single-scalar-parameter sub-problems is convex and can be easily solved by weighted median filter, and thus an effective algorithm can be readily constructed to tackle the original complex problem. Our extensive experiments on synthetic data and real face data demonstrate that the proposed method performs more robust than previous methods in the presence of outliers and/or missing entries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vasilescu M A O, Terzopoulos D. Multilinear analysis of image ensembles: Tensorfaces. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision. Berlin: Springer, 2002. 447–460

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jollife I. Principal Component Analysis. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1986

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Samuel A L. Independent component analysis: A new concept? Signal Process, 1994, 36: 287–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martinez A M, Kak A C. PCA versus LDA. IEEE Trans PAMI, 2001, 23: 228–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee D D, Seung H S. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature, 1999, 401: 788–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kolda T, Bader B. Tensor decompositions and applications. SIAM Review, 2009, 51: 455–500

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Croux C, Filzmoser P. Robust factorization of a data matrix. In: Proceedings in Computational Statistics. Berlin: Springer, 1998. 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  8. De la Torre F, Black M J. A framework for robust subspace learning. IJCV, 2003, 54: 117–142

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwak N. Principal component analysis based on l1-norm maximization. IEEE Trans PAMI, 2008, 30: 1672–1680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ding C, Zhou D, He X F, et al. R1-pca: Rotational invariant l1-norm principal component analysis for robust subspace factorization. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. New York: ACM Press, 2006. 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meng D Y, Xu Z B, Zhang L, et al. A cyclic weighted median method for L1 low-rank matrix factorization with missing entries. In: Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence. Carol Hamilton: AAAI Press, 2013. 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ke Q, Kanade T. Robust l 1 norm factorization in the presence of outliers and missing data by alternative convex programming. In: Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Press, 2005. 739–746

    Google Scholar 

  13. Eriksson A, van den Hengel A. Efficient computation of robust low-rank matrix approximations in the presence of missing data using the l 1 norm. In: Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Press, 2010. 771–778

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meng D Y, De la Torre F. Robust matrix factorization with unknown noise. In: International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE Press, 2013. 1337–1344

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gao C Q, Meng D Y, Yang Y, et al. Infrared patch-image model for small target detection in a single image. IEEE Trans Image Proc, 2013, 22: 4996–5009

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Buchanan A M, Fitzgibbon A W. Damped Newton algorithms for matrix factorization with missing data. In: Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Press, 2005. 316–322

    Google Scholar 

  17. Greub W H. Multilinear Algebra. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1967

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Tucker L R. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1966, 31: 279–311

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Vasilescu M A O, Terzopoulos D. Multilinear image analysis for facial recognition. In: International Conference on Pattern Recognition. IEEE Press, 2002. 205–211

    Google Scholar 

  20. de Lathauwer L. Signal processing based on multilinear algebra. PhD Thesis. Leuven: Katholieke Univ, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vasilescu M A O, Terzopoulos D. Multilinear subspace analysis of image ensembles. In: Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Press, 2003. 93–99

    Google Scholar 

  22. Huang H, Ding C. Robust tensor factorization using r1-norm. In: Proceedings of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE Press, 2008. 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nie F P, Huang H, Ding C, et al. Robust principal component analysis with non-greedy l 1-norm maximization. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Carol Hamilton: AAAI Press, 2011. 1433–1438

    Google Scholar 

  24. Inoue K, Hara K, Urahama K. Robust simultaneous low rank approximation of tensors. In: Advances in Image and Video Technology. Berlin: Springer, 2009. 574–584

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao Q, Meng D Y, Xu Z B, et al. Robust principal component analysis with complex noise. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning. New York: ACM Press, 2014. 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  26. Friedman J, Hastie T, Höfling H, et al. Pathwise coordinate optimization. Annals Appl Statistics, 2007, 1: 302–332

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularized paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. JSTAT SOFTW, 2010, 33: 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tseng P. Convergence of a block coordinate descent method for nondifferentiable minimization. JOTA, 2001, 109: 475–494

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Rauh A, Arce G R. A fast weighted median algorithm based on quickselect. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing. IEEE Press, 2010. 105–108

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to DeYu Meng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, D., Zhang, B., Xu, Z. et al. Robust low-rank tensor factorization by cyclic weighted median. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 58, 1–11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-014-5223-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-014-5223-4

Keywords

Navigation