Abstract
Urban management is increasingly dependent on the construction of cyber-physical systems, which have been widely deployed in multiple fields, including agriculture, transportation, and health care. Cyberphysical systems provide a large volume of big sensory data. Thus, the application of big data for urban emergency decision-making has become a challenge. Traditional decision-making models are unable to overcome several technical problems, including spatio-temporal information support and access to real-time service for disaster management and emergency response. In this paper, we propose a spatio-temporal enabled urban decision-making process modeling method in the cyber-physical environment and discuss the development off our basic metadata components, the definition of eleven-tuple information description structure. A prototype system is designed for modeling registering, management, visualization, and other functions. Decision-making processes are implemented as composite process chains through three phases, i.e., decision-making process modeling, instantiation of the decision-making process chain and execution of the decision-making process chain. For application to gas leak events, the decision-making process is executed to confirm the feasibility of the proposed decision-making process modeling method and the flexibility of the eleven-tuple information structure.
创新点
1) 可共享的时空决策过程
当前决策模型往往是孤立的、分散的和难以复用的。本文提出的决策过程链通过基于元模型的11元信息结构来描述了多种决策过程。决策过程链通过标准元数据信息和描述被设计成可共享的、可延伸的和易于管理的决策过程模型。此外, 传统的决策模型缺乏时空描述。城市中的突发事件可能会因为不同的时空属性而对应不同的决策过程。因此时空描述对信息物理环境下的决策过程有着重要的作用。
2) 决策过程的拓展性
本文提出的决策过程11元信息结构包括决策通用属性、决策特殊属性和时空属性。本文以燃气泄漏事件为例证明提出的决策过程的通用信息描述结构的可行性, 同时该信息描述结构可以拓展到其他突发事件如洪涝灾害事件等。同时说明了本文提出的方法具有良好的拓展性。
3) 动态过程链决策支持
当前城市应急决策模型通常是静态模型, 这些静态模型用于已经发生的突发事件, 并不能实现事件发生前的监测和实时快速的应急响应。而本文的决策过程是基于观测的决策过程, 可以快速发现突发事件并进行高效的事件决策过程。此外, 本文提出的决策过程链实现了突发事件的分阶段的动态决策过程。决策过程链将决策过程划分成不同的阶段, 在不同的阶段分配不同的任务, 并且动态推演突发事件的发展过程。此外, 根据基于SensorML的决策过程链, 用户可以高效的执行决策过程。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jankowski P. Integrating geographical information systems and multiple criteria decision-making methods. Int J Geogr Inf Syst, 1995, 9: 251–273
Xu X H, Liang D, Zhou Y J, et al. A risk elimination coordination method for large group decision-making in natural disaster emergencies. Hum Ecol Risk Assessment, 2015, 21: 1314–1325
Brézillon P, Aroua A. A representation of real-time decision-making by contextual graphs based simulation. J Decision Syst, 2013, 22: 28–42
Bouchart F J, Blackwood D J, Jowitt P W. Decision mapping: understanding decision-making processes. Civ Eng Environ Syst, 2002, 19: 187–207
Cui L. Applying fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to evaluate quality in crisis and emergency management. Commun Statist A-Theor Method, 2012, 41: 3942–3959
Zheng W, Fang B. Structure-independent disaster recovery: concept, architecture and implementations. Sci China Sers F-Inf Sci, 2009, 52: 813–823
Wei B, Jin Z, Zowghi D, et al. Implementation decision-making for internetware driven by quality requirements. Sci China Inf Sci, 2014, 57: 072104
Håkansson A, Hartung R. An infrastructure for individualised and intelligent decision-making and negotiation in cyber-physical systems. Procedia Comput Sci, 2014, 35: 822–831
Chen N C, Xiao C J, Pu F L, et al. Cyber-physical geographical information service-enabled control of diverse in-situ sensors. Sensors, 2015, 15: 2565–2592
DelinK A, Jackson S P, Jackson D W, et al. Environmental studies with the sensor web: principles and practice. Sensors, 2005, 5: 103–117
Luo Y T, Shen X J, Zhu Y M. Integrated optimization methods in multisensor decision and estimation fusion. Sci China Inf Sci, 2012, 55: 545–550
Hu C L, Guan Q F, Chen N C, et al. An observation capability metadata model for EO sensor discovery in sensor web enablement environments. Remot Sens, 2014, 6: 10546–10570
Ren W, Ren Y, Zhang H. Secure, dependable and publicly verifiable distributed data storage in unattended wireless sensor networks. Sci China Inf Sci, 2010, 53: 964–979
Vitoriano B, Rodríguez J T, Tirado G, et al. Intelligent decision-making models for disaster management. Hum Ecol Risk Assessment, 2015, 21: 1341–1360
Paolino L, Romano M, Sebilo M, et al. Supporting the on-site emergency management through a visualisation technique for mobile devices. J Locat Based Serv, 2010, 4: 222–239
Lumpe M, Schneider J G. A form-based meta-model for software composition. Sci Comput Program, 2005, 56: 59–78
Chen N C, Hu C L, Chen Y, et al. Using SensorML to construct a geoprocessing e-Science workflow model under a sensor web environment. Comput Geosci, 2012, 47: 119–129
Atkinson C, Kuhne T. Model-driven development: a metamodeling foundation. IEEE Softw, 2003 20: 3641
Othman S H, Beydoun G, Sugumaran V. Development and validation of a Disaster Management Metamodel (DMM). Inf Process Manag, 2014, 50: 235–271
Chen N C, Wang K, Xiao C J, et al. A heterogeneous sensor web node meta-model for the management of a flood monitoring system. Environ Modell Softw, 2014, 54: 222–237
Chen N C, Di L P, Yu G N, et al. Use of ebRIM-based CSW with sensor observation services for registry and discovery of remote-sensing observations. Comput Geosci, 2009, 35: 360–372
Chen N C, Di L P, Yu G N, et al. A flexible geospatial sensor observation service for diverse sensor data based on Web service. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 2009, 64: 234–242
Lee J, Jeong Y, Oh Y S, et al. An integrated approach to intelligent urban facilities management for real-time emergency response. Autom Constr, 2013, 30: 256–264
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, W., Hu, C., Chen, N. et al. Spatio-temporal enabled urban decision-making process modeling and visualization under the cyber-physical environment. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 58, 1–17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-015-5403-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-015-5403-x