Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Countering JPEG anti-forensics based on noise level estimation

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantization artifact and blocking artifact are the two types of well-known fingerprints of JPEG compression. Most JPEG forensic techniques are focused on these fingerprints. However, recent research shows that these fingerprints can be intentionally concealed via anti-forensics, which in turn makes current JPEG forensic methods vulnerable. A typical JPEG anti-forensic method is adding anti-forensic dither to DCT transform coefficients and erasing blocking artifact to remove the trace of compression history. To deal with this challenge in JPEG forensics, in this paper, we propose a novel countering method based on the noise level estimation to identify the uncompressed images from those forged ones. The experimental results show that the proposed method achieves superior performance on several image databases with only one-dimensional feature. It is also worth emphasizing that the proposed threshold-based method has explicit physical meaning and is simple to be implemented in practice. Moreover, we analyze the strategies available to the investigator and the forger in the case of that they are aware of the existence of each other. Game theory is used to evaluate the ultimate performance when both sides adopt their Nash equilibrium strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kwok C W, Au O C, Chui S H. Alternative anti-forensics method for contrast enhancement. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Digital-Forensics and Watermarking, Atlantic, 2011. 398–410

    Google Scholar 

  2. Milani S, Tagliasacchi M, Tubaro S. Antiforensics attacks to Benford’s law for the detection of double compressed images. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Vancouver, 2013. 3053–3057

    Google Scholar 

  3. Qian Z X, Zhang X P. Improved anti-forensics of JPEG compression. J Syst Softw, 2014, 91: 100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fan W, Wang K, Cayre F, et al. JPEG anti-forensics using non-parametric DCT quantization noise estimation and natural image statistics. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Information Hiding and Multimedia Security, Montpellier, 2013. 117–122

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barni M, Tondi B. The source identification game: an information-theoretic perspective. IEEE Trans Inf Forens Secur, 2013, 8: 450–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Stamm M C, Lin W S, Liu K J R. Forensics vs. anti-forensics: a decision and game theoretic framework. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Kyoto, 2012. 1749–1752

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pevny T, Fridrich J. Detection of double-compression in JPEG images for applications in steganography. IEEE Trans Inf Forens Secur, 2008, 3: 247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lukas J, Fridrich J. Estimation of primary quantization matrix in double compressed JPEG images. In: Proceedings of Digital Forensic Research Workshop, Cleveland, 2003. 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fu D D, Shi Y Q, Su W. A generalized Benford’s law for JPEG coefficients and its applications in image forensics. In: Proceedings of SPIE 6505, Security, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents, San Jose, 2007. 65051L

    Google Scholar 

  10. He J F, Lin Z C, Wang L F, et al. Detecting doctored JPEG images via DCT coefficient analysis. In: Proceedings of 9th European Conference on Computer Vision, Graz, 2006. 423–435

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bianchi T, de Rosa A, Piva A. Improved DCT coefficient analysis for forgery localization in JPEG images. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Prague, 2011. 2444–2447

    Google Scholar 

  12. Farid H. Exposing digital forgeries from JPEG ghosts. IEEE Trans Inf Forens Secur, 2009, 4: 154–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Farid H. Digital Image Ballistics from JPEG Quantization. TR2006–583. 2008

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stamm M C, Tjoa S K, Lin W S, et al. Anti-forensics of JPEG compression. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Dallas, 2010. 1694–1697

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stamm M C, Liu K J R. Anti-forensics of digital image compression. IEEE Trans Inf Forens Secur, 2011, 6: 1050–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jiang Y W, Zeng H, Kang X G, et al. The game of countering JPEG anti-forensics based on the noise level estimation. In: Proceedings of Asian-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Submit Conference, Taiwan, 2013. 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schaefer G, Stich M. UCID: an uncompressed color image database. In: Proceedings of SPIE 5307, Storage and Retrieval Methods and Applications for Multimedia, San Jose, 2004. 472–480

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bas P, Filler T, Pevny T. Break our steganographic system: the ins and outs of organizing BOSS. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Information Hiding, Prague, 2011. 59–70

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lam E Y, Goodman J W. A mathematical analysis of the DCT coefficient distributions for images. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2000, 9: 1661–1666

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Fan Z G, de Queiroz R L. Identification of bitmap compression history: JPEG detection and quantizer estimation. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2003, 12: 230–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kirchner M, Fridrich J. On detection of median filtering in digital images. In: Proceedings of SPIE, Electronic Imaging, Media Forensics and Security II, San Jose, 2010. 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lai S Y, Bohme R. Countering counter-forensics: the case of JPEG compression. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Information Hiding, Prague, 2011. 285–298

    Google Scholar 

  23. Valenzise G, Nobile V, Tagliasacchi M, et al. Countering JPEG anti-forensics. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Brussels, 2011. 1949–1952

    Google Scholar 

  24. Valenzise G, Tagliasacchi M, Tubaro S. Revealing the traces of JPEG compression anti-forensics. IEEE Trans Inf Forens Secur, 2013, 8: 335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rudin L I, Osher S, Fatemi E. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D: Nonl Phenom, 1992, 60: 259–268

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Li H D, Luo W Q, Huang J W. Countering anti-JPEG compression forensics. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Orlando, 2012. 241–244

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu X H, Tanaka M, Okutomi M. Noise level estimation using weak textured patches of a single noisy image. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Orlando, 2012. 665–668

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shin D H, Park R H, Yang S, et al. Block-based noise estimation using adaptive Gaussian filtering. IEEE Trans Consum Electr, 2005, 51: 218–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pyatykh S, Hesser J, Zheng L. Image noise level estimation by principal component analysis. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2013, 22: 687–699

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu W, Lin W S. Additive white Gaussian noise level estimation in SVD domain for images. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2013, 22: 872–883

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Lyu S W, Pan X Y, Zhang X. Exposing region splicing forgeries with blind local noise estimation. Int J Comput Vis, 2014, 110: 202–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Osborne M J, Rubinstein A. A Course in Game Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1994

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Hespanha J P. An Introductory Course in Noncooperative Game Theory. http://www.ece.ucsb. edu/~hespanha/

  34. Grant M C, Boyd S P. Graph Implementations for Non-smooth Convex Programs. Recent Advances in Learning and Control. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2008. 95–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. U1536204, 61379155, 61332012), National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (Grant No. s2013020012788), and Special Funding for Basic Scientific Research of Sun Yat-sen University (Grant No. 6177060230).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Key Laboratory of Information Security, School of Data and Computer Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510006, China

    Hui Zeng, Jingjing Yu & Xiangui Kang

  2. Department of Computer Science, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, NY, 12222, USA

    Siwei Lyu

Authors
  1. Hui Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jingjing Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiangui Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Siwei Lyu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiangui Kang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeng, H., Yu, J., Kang, X. et al. Countering JPEG anti-forensics based on noise level estimation. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 61, 032103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-016-0426-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-016-0426-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation