Skip to main content
Log in

Stateful implication logic based on perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the conventional von Neumann architecture meets critical limitations of data transfer bandwidth and energy consumption, perpendicular magnetic anisotropy magnetic tunnel junction based processing-in-memory paradigm attracts extensive attention as a promising substitute thanks to its non-volatility, low-power switching, fast access and infinite endurance. In this work, we propose and experimentally demonstrate a new spintronic implication logic gate that consists of two parallel perpendicular magnetic anisotropy magnetic tunnel junctions with different diameters. Material implication and furthermore NAND logic functions are implemented by all electrically-controlled operations. The reliability of this structure is verified, especially in sub-20 nm node, which shows great potential for large-density processing-in-memory applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shannon C E. A symbolic analysis of relay and switching circuits. Electr Eng, 1938, 57: 713–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borghetti J, Snider G S, Kuekes P J, et al. ‘Memristive’ switches enable ‘stateful’ logic operations via material implication. Nature, 2010, 464: 873–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim N S, Austin T, Blaauw D, et al. Leakage current: Moore’s law meets static power. Computer, 2003, 36: 68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shulaker M M, Hills G, Park R S, et al. Three-dimensional integration of nanotechnologies for computing and data storage on a single chip. Nature, 2017, 547: 74–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li Y, Zhou Y X, Wang Z R, et al. Memcomputing: fusion of memory and computing. Sci China Inf Sci, 2018, 61: 060424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gao M, Ayers G, Kozyrakis C. Practical near-data processing for in-memory analytics frameworks. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Parallel Architecture and Compilation (PACT), San Francisco, 2015. 123–124

  7. Chen B, Cai F X, Zhou J T, et al. Efficient in-memory computing architecture based on crossbar arrays. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), Washington, 2015

  8. Ahn J, Hong S, Yoo S, et al. A scalable processing-in-memory accelerator for parallel graph processing. In: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, New York, 2015. 105–117

  9. Li S C, Xu C, Zou Q S, et al. Pinatubo: a processing-in-memory architecture for bulk bitwise operations in emerging non-volatile memories. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Design Automation Conference, New York, 2016

  10. Cao K H, Cai W L, Liu Y Z, et al. In-memory direct processing based on nanoscale perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions. Nanoscale, 2018, 10: 21225–21230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang Y C, Chen B, Lu W D. Memristive physically evolving networks enabling the emulation of heterosynaptic plasticity. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 7720–7727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kent A D, Worledge D C. A new spin on magnetic memories. Nat Nanotech, 2015, 10: 187–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang L Z, Kang W, Ebrahimi F, et al. Voltage-controlled magnetic tunnel junctions for processing-in-memory implementation. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2018, 39: 440–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suh D I, Kil J P, Kim K W, et al. A single magnetic tunnel junction representing the basic logic functions — NAND, NOR, and IMP. IEEE Electron Device Lett, 2015, 36: 402–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Slesazeck S, Mikolajick T. Nanoscale resistive switching memory devices: a review. Nanotechnology, 2019, 30: 352003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Peng S Z, Zhao W S, Qiao J F, et al. Giant interfacial perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in MgO/CoFe/capping layer structures. Appl Phys Lett, 2017, 110: 072403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kent A D. Spintronics: perpendicular all the way. Nat Mater, 2010, 9: 699–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang M X, Cai W L, Cao K H, et al. Current-induced magnetization switching in atom-thick tungsten engineered perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions with large tunnel magnetoresistance. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Slonczewski J C. Current-driven excitation of magnetic multilayers. J Magn Magn Mater, 1996, 159: 1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Berger L. Emission of spin waves by a magnetic multilayer traversed by a current. Phys Rev B, 1996, 54: 9353–9358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ikeda S, Miura K, Yamamoto H, et al. A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB-MgO magnetic tunnel junction. Nat Mater, 2010, 9: 721–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. D’Souza N, Biswas A, Ahmad H, et al. Energy-efficient switching of nanomagnets for computing: straintronics and other methodologies. Nanotechnology, 2018, 29: 442001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee J, Suh D I, Park W. The universal magnetic tunnel junction logic gates representing 16 binary Boolean logic operations. J Appl Phys, 2015, 117: 17D717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mahmoudi H, Windbacher T, Sverdlov V, et al. Reliability analysis and comparison of implication and reprogrammable logic gates in magnetic tunnel junction logic circuits. IEEE Trans Magn, 2013, 49: 5620–5628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sato H, Enobio E C I, Yamanouchi M, et al. Properties of magnetic tunnel junctions with a MgO/CoFeB/Ta/CoFeB/MgO recording structure down to junction diameter of 11 nm. Appl Phys Lett, 2014, 105: 062403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun J Z, Brown S L, Chen W, et al. Spin-torque switching efficiency in CoFeB-MgO based tunnel junctions. Phys Rev B, 2013, 88: 104426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao W, Moreau M, Deng E, et al. Synchronous non-volatile logic gate design based on resistive switching memories. IEEE Trans Circ Syst I, 2014, 61: 443–454

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sato H, Yamanouchi M, Ikeda S, et al. Perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB-MgO magnetic tunnel junctions with a MgO/CoFeB/Ta/CoFeB/MgO recording structure. Appl Phys Lett, 2012, 101: 022414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Watanabe K, Jinnai B, Fukami S, et al. Shape anisotropy revisited in single-digit nanometer magnetic tunnel junctions. Nat Commun, 2018, 9: 663

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61571023, 61627813), International Collaboration Project (Grant No. B16001), National Key Technology Program of China (Grant No. 2017ZX01032101), and Academic Excellence Foundation of BUAA for Ph.D. Students.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kaihua Cao or Weisheng Zhao.

Additional information

Supporting information

Appendixes A and B. The supporting information is available online at info.scichina.com and link.springer.com. The supporting materials are published as submitted, without typesetting or editing. The responsibility for scientific accuracy and content remains entirely with the authors.

Supplementary File

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, W., Wang, M., Cao, K. et al. Stateful implication logic based on perpendicular magnetic tunnel junctions. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 65, 122406 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-3189-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-020-3189-x

Keywords

Navigation