Skip to main content
Log in

Low-complexity transmit antenna selection for offset spatial modulation

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Euclidean distance optimized antenna selection (EDAS) has been integrated with offset spatial modulation (OSM) for alleviating the effects of channel fading and increasing diversity gain, but the complexity of EDAS may become excessive upon increasing transmit antennas, particularly for the large-scale multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems. In pursuit of low complexity, we conceive a novel transmit antenna selection (TAS) scheme for OSM, where the challenge of exhaustively searching all possible antenna subsets is tackled with the aid of a specific single tree search. Simulation results demonstrate the advantage of the proposed scheme in terms of significant search complexity reduction while achieving near-optimal bit error rate (BER) performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mesleh R Y, Haas H, Sinanovic S, et al. Spatial modulation. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2008, 57: 2228–2241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Di Renzo M, Haas H, Ghrayeb A, et al. Spatial modulation for generalized MIMO: challenges, opportunities, and implementation. Proc IEEE, 2014, 102: 56–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang P, Di Renzo M, Xiao Y, et al. Design guidelines for spatial modulation. IEEE Commun Surv Tut, 2015, 17: 6–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. You X H, Wang C X, Huang J, et al. Towards 6G wireless communication networks: vision, enabling technologies, and new paradigm shifts. Sci China Inf Sci, 2021, 64: 110301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fang S, Zheng K L, Xiao Y, et al. Offset spatial modulation and offset space shift keying: efficient designs for single-RF MIMO systems. IEEE Trans Commun, 2019, 67: 5434–5444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gao Y L, Xiao Y, Wu M M, et al. Dynamic social-aware peer selection for cooperative relay management with D2D communications. IEEE Trans Commun, 2019, 67: 3124–3139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu C, Wu M M, Gao Y L, et al. Dynamic relay access for D2D-aided low-latency and high-reliability communications. Sci China Inf Sci, 2021, 64: 120302

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao J Y, Wu Y P, Wang Y J, et al. Uplink transmission design for crowded correlated cell-free massive MIMO-OFDM systems. Sci China Inf Sci, 2021, 64: 182309

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang P, Xiao Y, Li L, et al. Link adaptation for spatial modulation with limited feedback. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2012, 61: 3808–3813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rajashekar R, Hari K V S, Hanzo L. Antenna selection in spatial modulation systems. IEEE Commun Lett, 2013, 17: 521–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung W H, Hung C Y. Multi-antenna selection using space shift keying in MIMO systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, 2012. 1–5

  12. Zhou Z Q, Ge N, Lin X K. Reduced-complexity antenna selection schemes in spatial modulation. IEEE Commun Lett, 2014, 18: 14–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pillay N, Xu H J. Comments on “antenna selection in spatial modulation systems”. IEEE Commun Lett, 2013, 17: 1681–1683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang N, Liu W L, Men H Z, et al. Further complexity reduction using rotational symmetry for EDAS in spatial modulation. IEEE Commun Lett, 2014, 18: 1835–1838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ntontin K, Di Renzo M, Perez-Neira A I, et al. A low-complexity method for antenna selection in spatial modulation systems. IEEE Commun Lett, 2013, 17: 2312–2315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng J P, Chen J J. Further complexity reduction for antenna selection in spatial modulation systems. IEEE Commun Lett, 2015, 19: 937–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sun Z J, Xiao Y, Yang P, et al. Transmit antenna selection schemes for spatial modulation systems: search complexity reduction and large-scale MIMO applications. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2017, 66: 8010–8021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rajashekar R, Hari K V S, Hanzo L. Reduced-complexity ML detection and capacity-optimized training for spatial modulation systems. IEEE Trans Commun, 2014, 62: 112–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang P, Xiao Y, Zhang B, et al. Power allocation-aided spatial modulation for limited-feedback MIMO systems. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2015, 64: 2198–2204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang P, Xiao Y, Li S Q, et al. A low-complexity power allocation algorithm for multiple-input-multiple-output spatial modulation systems. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2016, 65: 1819–1825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Y R, Xiong W H, Xiao Y, et al. Transmit antenna selection in offset spatial modulation systems. IEEE Commun Lett, 2020, 24: 1572–1576

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61771106) and National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2020YFB1807203).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shu Fang or Gang Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, H., Xiao, Y., Fang, S. et al. Low-complexity transmit antenna selection for offset spatial modulation. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 65, 192302 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-021-3333-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-021-3333-4

Keywords

Navigation