Skip to main content
Log in

Bivariate nonlinear prediction to quantify the strength of complex dynamical interactions in short-term cardiovascular variability

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A nonlinear prediction method for investigating the dynamic interdependence between short length time series is presented. The method is a generalization to bivariate prediction of the univariate approach based on nearest neighbor local linear approximation. Given the input and output series x and y, the relationship between a pattern of samples of x and a synchronous sample of y was approximated with a linear polynomial whose coefficients were estimated from an equation system including the nearest neighbor patterns in x and the corresponding samples in y. To avoid overfitting and waste of data, the training and testing stages of the prediction were designed through a specific out-of-sample cross validation. The robustness of the method was assessed on short realizations of simulated processes interacting either linearly or nonlinearly. The predictor was then used to characterize the dynamical interaction between the short-term spontaneous fluctuations of heart period (RR interval) and systolic arterial pressure (SAP) in healthy young subjects. In the supine position, the predictability of RR given SAP was low and influenced by nonlinear dynamics. After head-up tilt the predictability increased significantly and was mostly due to linear dynamics. These findings were related to the larger involvement of the baroreflex regulation from SAP to RR in upright than in supine humans, and to the simplification of the RR–SAP coupling occurring with the tilt-induced alteration of the neural regulation of the cardiovascular rhythms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LP:

Level of predictability

SAP:

Systolic arterial pressure

RR:

Heart period (RR interval)

References

  1. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Contr 19:716–723

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Ancona N, Marinazzo D, Stramaglia S (2004) Radial basis function approach to nonlinear Granger causality of time series. Phys Rev E 70:0556221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandt ME, Ademoglu A, Pritchard WS (2000) Nonlinear prediction and complexity of alpha EEG activity. Int J Bifurcat Chaos 10:123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bressler SL, Coppola R, Nakamura R (1993) Episodic multiregional cortical coherence at multiple frequencies during visual task performance. Nature 366:153–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Casdagli M (1989) Nonlinear prediction of chaotic time series. Physica D 35:335–356

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Casdagli M (1991) Chaos and deterministic versus stochastic nonlinear modeling. J Roy Stat Soc B 54:308–328

    Google Scholar 

  7. Casdagli M, Weigend AS (1993) Exploring the continuum between deterministic and stochastic modeling. In: Weigend AS, Gershenfeld NA (eds) Time series prediction: forecasting the future and understanding the past. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp 347–366

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen MA, Taylor JA (2002) Short-term cardiovascular oscillations in man: measuring and modelling the physiologies. J Physiol 542:669–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Faes L, Porta A, Cucino R, Cerutti S, Antolini R, Nollo G (2004a) Causal transfer function analysis to describe closed loop interactions between cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory variability signals. Biol Cybern 90:390–399

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Faes L, Pinna GD, Porta A, Maestri R, Nollo G (2004b) Surrogate data analysis for assessing the significance of the coherence function. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51:1156–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Farmer JD, Sidorowich JJ (1987) Predicting chaotic time series. Phys Rev Lett 59:845–848

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Feldmann U, Bhattacharya J (2004) Predictability improvement as an asymmetrical measure of interdependence in bivariate time series. Int J Bifurcat Chaos 14:505–514

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Fortrat JO, Yamamoto Y, Hughson RL (1997) Respiratory influences on non-linear dynamics of heart rate variability in humans. Biol Cybern 77:1–10

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Granger CWJ (1963) Economic processes involving feedback. Inf Control 6:28–48

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hastings HM, Evans SJ, Quan W, Chong ML, Nwasokwa O (1996) Nonlinear dynamics in ventricular fibrillation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:10495–10499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoyer D, Bauer R, Walter B, Zwiener U (1998) Estimation of nonlinear couplings on the basis of complexity and predictability–a new method applied to cardiorespiratory coordination. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 45:545–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kanters JK, Holstein-Rathlou NH, Agner E (1994) Lack of evidence for low-dimensional chaos in heart rate variability. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 5:591–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (1999) Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp 8:194–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Malliani A (2000) Principles of cardiovascular neural regulation in health and disease. Kluwer, Norwell

    Google Scholar 

  20. May RM (1976) Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature 261:459–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Montano N, Gnecchi Ruscone T, Porta A, Lombardi F, Pagani M, Malliani A (1994) Power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability to assess the change in sympathovagal balance during graded orthostatic tilt. Circulation 90:1826–1831

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nollo G, Faes L, Pellegrini B, Porta A, Antolini R (2000) Synchronization index for quantifying nonlinear causal coupling between RR interval and systolic arterial pressure after myocardial infarction. Comput Cardiol 27:143–146

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nollo G, Faes L, Porta A, Pellegrini B, Ravelli F, Del Greco M, Disertori M, Antolini R (2002) Evidence of unbalanced regulatory mechanism of heart rate and arterial pressure after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 283:H1200–H1207

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nollo G, Faes L, Porta A, Antolini R, Ravelli F (2005) Exploring directionality in spontaneous heart period and systolic pressure variability interactions in humans. Implications in baroreflex gain evaluation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 288:H1777–H1785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pincus SM, Goldberger AL (1994) Physiological time-series analysis: what does regularity quantify? Am J Physiol 266:H1643–H1656

    Google Scholar 

  26. Porta A, Baselli G, Guzzetti S, Pagani M, Malliani A, Cerutti S (2000) Prediction of short cardiovascular variability signals based on conditional distribution. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 47:1555–1564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Porta A, Furlan R, Rimoldi O, Pagani M, Malliani A, van de Borne P (2002) Quantifying the strength of the linear causal coupling in closed loop interacting cardiovascular variability signals. Biol Cybern 86:241–251

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Schäfer C, Rosenblum MG, Kurths J, Abel HH (1998) Heartbeat synchronized with ventilation. Nature 392:239–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schiff SJ, So P, Chang T, Burke RE, Sauer T (1996) Detecting dynamical interdependence and generalized synchrony through mutual prediction in a neural ensemble. Phys Rev E 54:6708–6724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schreiber T (1999) Interdisciplinary application of nonlinear time series methods. Phys Rep 308:1–64

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Sugihara G, May RM (1990) Nonlinear forecasting as a way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series. Nature 344:734–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology, the North-American Society of Pacing, Electrophysiology (1996) Heart rate variability. Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation 93:1043–1065

    Google Scholar 

  33. Takens F (1981) Detecting strange attractors in fluid turbulence. In: Rand D, Young SL (eds) Dynamical systems and turbulence. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 336–381

    Google Scholar 

  34. Theiler J, Eubank S, Longtin A, Galdrikian B, Farmer JD (1992) Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D 58:77–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Weigend AS, Gershenfeld NA (1993) Time series prediction: forecasting the future and understanding the past. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wiesenfeldt M, Parlitz U, Lauterborn W (2001) Mixed state analysis of multivariate time series. Int J Bifurcat Chaos 8:2217–2226

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Faes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Faes, L., Nollo, G. Bivariate nonlinear prediction to quantify the strength of complex dynamical interactions in short-term cardiovascular variability. Med Bio Eng Comput 44, 383–392 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0043-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0043-3

Keywords

Navigation