Skip to main content
Log in

Interventional navigation for abdominal therapy based on simultaneous use of MRI and ultrasound

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An interventional navigation system designed for percutaneous abdominal therapies was proposed, and a pilot study was carried out to assess the proposed system. Integration of US to MRI-based segmentation and 3D display of tumours can help physicians deal with instabilities such as respiratory motion and soft tissue shift that are inherent in abdominal interventions. In addition to the 3D display of the needle and tumours, we adapted the system for the abdominal applications and incorporated a process to correct the mismatch in needle path between MRI and US. The preliminary results of phantom and animal experiments indicated that the proposed method could combine the advantages of both MRI and US. The time required to determine the optimal needle insertion path by using this system was significantly less than that required when either US or MRI guidance alone was employed. The developed system was applied in two patients who underwent PEIT therapy, and its clinical feasibility was partially confirmed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Schulz T, Puccini S, Schneider J-P, Kahn T (2004) Interventional and intraoperative MR: review and update of techniques and clinical experience. Eur Radiol 14:2212–2227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vannier MW, Haller JW (1999) Navigation in diagnosis and therapy. Eur J Radiol 31:132–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beppu T, Doi K, Ishiko T, Ogawa M (2003) Local ablation therapy. Consensus of cancer therapy 2003(Summer):144–148

  4. Pagoulatos N, Edwards WS, Haynor DR, Kim Y (1999) Interactive 3-D registration of ultrasound and magnetic resonance images based on a magnetic position sensor. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 3(4):278–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tronnier VM, Bonsanto MM, Staubert A, Knauth M, Kunze S, Wirtz CR (2001) Comparison of intraoperative MR imaging and 3D-navigated ultrasonography in the detection and resection control of lesions. Neurosurg Focus 10(2):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Slomka PJ, Mandel J, Downey D, Fenster A (2001) Evaluation of voxel-based registration of 3-D power Doppler ultrasound and 3-D magnetic resonance angiographic images of carotid arteries. Ultrasound Med Biol 27(7):945–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lange T, Eulenstein S, Hunerbein M, Schlag PM (2003) Vessel-based non-rigid registration of MR/CT and 3D ultrasound for navigation in liver surgery. Comput Aided Surg 8(5):228–240

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grenacher L, Thorn M, Knaebel HP, Vetter M, Hassenpflug P, Kraus T, Meinzer HP, Buchler MW, Kauffmann GW, Richter GM (2005) The role of 3-D imaging and computer-based postprocessing for surgery of the liver and pancreas. Rofo 177(9):1219–1226

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bonsanto MM, Staubert A, Wirtz1 CR, Tronnier V, Kunze S (2001) Initial experience with an ultrasound-integrated single-rack neuronavigation system. Acta Neurochir 143:1127–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Comeaua RM, Sadikot AF, Fenster A, Peters TM (2000) Intraoperative ultrasound for guidance and tissue shift correction in image-guided neurosurgery. Med Phys 27(4):787–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gobbi DG, Comeau RM, Peters TM (2000) Ultrasound/MRI overlay with image warping for neurosurgery. LNCS 1935:106–114

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lorusso A, Eggert DW, Fisher RB (1995) A comparison of four algorithms for estimating 3D rigid transformations. Br Machine Vis Conf 237–246

  13. Liu H, Yu Y, Schell MC, O’Dell WG, Ruo R, Okunieff P (2003) Optimal marker placement in photogrammetry patient positioning system. Med Phys 30(2):103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rose SC, Nelson TR, Deutsch R (2004) Display of 3-D ultrasonographic images for interventional procedures volume-rendered versus multiplanar display. J Ultrasound Med 23:1465–1473

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chau A, Gopal A, Mao S, Tseng PH, Fischer H, Budoff MJ (2006) Comparison of three generations of electron beam tomography on image noise and reproducibility, a phantom study. Invest Radiol 41(6):522–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Hong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hong, J., Nakashima, H., Konishi, K. et al. Interventional navigation for abdominal therapy based on simultaneous use of MRI and ultrasound. Med Bio Eng Comput 44, 1127–1134 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0133-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-006-0133-2

Keywords

Navigation