Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quantitative measurement of hip protector use and compliance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hip protectors are often prescribed to the elderly who are at risk of falling, with the goal of preventing hip fractures. However, determining the effectiveness of hip protectors has been hampered by unreliable compliance data. This study reports a reliable objective method of measuring compliance and the developed method could be used in any climate, regardless of temperature. Custom compliance monitors were built and embedded inside hip protectors. An algorithm was developed to utilize both temperature and acceleration to determine compliance. Seven young volunteers (age 24.6 ± 4.2 years old) wore the protectors for a total of 667 h while closely recording their compliance. One female (77 years old) who had hip fracture history wore the compliance monitors for 91.6 % of the time during a 1-week stay in a hospital. From the volunteers’ trial, using temperature alone overpredicted compliance by 1.2 % and using acceleration alone overpredicted by 5.4 %, but using a combination of the two methods plus a correction factor only underestimated by 0.6 %. From the elderly data, the average compliance recorded from the temperature, acceleration, and combined methods with correction was 94.6, 88.9, and 90.2, respectively. The high accuracy of temperature sensors in this study will not be attainable in hot climates where most of the worldwide increase in hip fractures is occurring. The developed monitor with the algorithm provided high accuracy in determining compliance and was able to determine both the longitudinal and cross-sectional compliance at any time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cameron ID, Fisher W, Lockwood K et al (2011) Assessing adherence to use of Hip Protectors: automated monitoring is feasible. J Am Geriatr Soc 59(9):1766–1767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cryer C, Knox A, Martin D et al (2002) Hip protector compliance among older people living in residential care homes. Inj Prev 8:202–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359(9319):1761–1767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gillespie WJ, Gillespie LD, Parker MJ (2010) Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in older people. In: Parker MJ (eds) Cochrane database of systematic reviews, the Cochrane collaboration, Wiley, Chichester

  5. Gulberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA (1997) World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 7(5):407–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kannus P, Parkkari J (2006) Prevention of hip fracture with hip protectors. Age Ageing 35:S2ii51–54

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kurrle SE, Cameron ID, Quine S et al (2004) Adherence with hip protectors: a proposal for standardised definitions. Osteoporos Int 15(1):1–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ling X, Aimin L, Xihe Z et al (1996) Very low rates of hip fracture in Beijing, People’s Republic of China: the Beijing osteoporosis project. Am J Epidemiol 144(9):901–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller DJ, Franzone JM, Matsumoto H et al (2012) Electronic monitoring improves brace-wearing compliance in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 37(9):717–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicholson GP, Ferguson-Pell MW, Smith K et al (2003) The objective measurement of spinal orthosis use for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28(19):2243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parker MJ (2006) Effectiveness of hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in elderly people: systematic review. BMJ 332(7541):571–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Parkkari J, Heikkilä J, Kannus P (1998) Acceptability and compliance with energy-shunting hip protectors: a 6-month prospective follow-up in a Finnish nursing home. Age Ageing 27:225–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sawka AM, Ismaila N, Raina P et al (2010) Hip fracture prevention strategies in long-term care- A survey of Canadian physicians’ opinions. Can Fam Physician 56:392–397

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tracey M, Villar A, Hill P et al (1998) Will elderly rest home residents wear hip protectors? Age Ageing 27:195–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Den Kroonenberg AJ, Hayes WC, McMahon TA (1995) Dynamic models for sideways falls from standing height. J Biomech Eng 117(3):309–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Van Schoor NM, Deville WL, Bouter LM et al (2002) Acceptance and compliance with external hip protectors: a systematic review of the literature. Osteoporos Int 13(12):917–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edmond Lou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, K.R., Lou, E., Woloschuk, C. et al. Quantitative measurement of hip protector use and compliance. Med Biol Eng Comput 52, 9–15 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1116-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1116-8

Keywords

Navigation