Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A computational study to evaluate the activation pattern of nerve fibers in response to interferential currents stimulation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interferential current (IFC) is one of the most popular electrical currents used in electrotherapy. However, there have been limited studies investigating how this stimulation affects the nerve fibers. The aim of this computational study was to evaluate the temporal and spatial patterns of fiber activation in IFC therapy for different modulation and carrier frequencies. The interferential currents were applied by two pairs of point electrodes perpendicular to each other in an infinite homogeneous medium, and a model of myelinated nerve fibers was implemented in NEURON to study the neural response. The activation thresholds for different positions of the fiber and the resultant firing patterns were evaluated. The results suggest that the fibers may fire continuously or in bursts, with frequencies equal or higher than the modulation frequency, or may be blocked, based on their position relative to the electrodes, the modulation frequency and the stimulus strength. The results confirm traditional belief about the role of the modulation frequency in firing frequency of nerve fibers and describe a possible mechanism for less sensation of pain, due to blockage of the fibers by the high-frequency nature of the interferential currents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abulkhair B, Rayner A, Chipchase L, Souvlis T (2011) Penetration and spread of interferential current in cutaneous, subcutaneous and muscle tissues. Physiotherapy 97(4):319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiu S, Ritchie R, Rogart R, Stagg D (1979) A quantitative description of membrane currents in rabbit myelinated nerve. J Physiol 292:149–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Goats G (1990) Interferential current therapy. Br J Sports Med 24:87–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khurana I (2006) Text book of medical physiology. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kilgore KL, Bhadra N (2004) Nerve conduction block utilizing high-frequency alternating current. Med Biol Eng Comput 42:394–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuhn A, Keller T, Lawrence M, Morari M (2009) A model for transcutaneous current stimulation: simulations and experiments. Med Biol Eng Comput 47:279–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Manzouri F, Mahnam A, Emadi M (2011) A computational study to evaluate the mechanism of selectivity in interferential current therapy. In: Proceedings of 18th ICBME, Tehran

  8. Marijke H, Els M, Ineke S, Coen van S (2005) Interferential therapy manual. Enraf Nonius company http://www.enraf-nonius.com/docman-downloads/doc_download/148-electrotherapy-interferentialtherapy-1433762-42-zip. Accessed 19 Mar 2015

  9. McIntyre C, Richardson A, Grill WM (2002) Modeling the excitability of mammalian nerve fibers: influence of after potentials on the recovery cycle. J Neurophysiol 87:995–1006

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mesin L, Merletti R (2008) Distribution of electrical stimulation current in a planar multilayer anisotropic tissue. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(2):660–670

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nemec H (1959) Interferential therapy: a new approach in physical medicine. Br J Physiother 12:9–12

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ozcan J, Ward AR, Robertson VJ (2004) A comparison of true and premodulated interferential currents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:409–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Palmer ST, Martin DJ, Steedman WM, Ravey J (1999) Alteration of interferential current and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation frequency: effects on nerve excitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:1065–1071

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rattay F (1986) High frequency electrostimulation of excitable cells. J Theor Biol 123:45–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rattay F (1999) The basic mechanism for the electrical stimulation of the nervous system. Neuroscience 88:335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Robertson VJ, Ward AR, Low J, Reed A (2006) Electrotherapy explained: principles and practice, 4th edn. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  17. Treffene RJ (1983) Interferential fields in a fluid medium. Aust J Physiother 29:209–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ward AR (2009) Electrical stimulation using kilohertz-frequency alternating current. Phys Ther 89:181–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ward AR, Robertson VJ (1998) Sensory, motor, and pain thresholds for stimulation with medium frequency alternating current. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79:273–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wesselink W, Holsheimer J, Boom H (1999) A model of electrical behaviour of myelinated sensory nerve fibers based on human data. Med Biol Eng Comput 37:228–235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Isfahan, University St, Isfahan, Iran

    Mahsa Agharezaee & Amin Mahnam

Authors
  1. Mahsa Agharezaee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amin Mahnam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Mahnam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agharezaee, M., Mahnam, A. A computational study to evaluate the activation pattern of nerve fibers in response to interferential currents stimulation. Med Biol Eng Comput 53, 713–720 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1279-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1279-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation