Skip to main content
Log in

Toward the improvement in fetal monitoring during labor with the inclusion of maternal heart rate analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fetal heart rate (FHR) monitoring is used routinely in labor, but conventional methods have a limited capacity to detect fetal hypoxia/acidosis. An exploratory study was performed on the simultaneous assessment of maternal heart rate (MHR) and FHR variability, to evaluate their evolution during labor and their capacity to detect newborn acidemia. MHR and FHR were simultaneously recorded in 51 singleton term pregnancies during the last two hours of labor and compared with newborn umbilical artery blood (UAB) pH. Linear/nonlinear indices were computed separately for MHR and FHR. Interaction between MHR and FHR was quantified through the same indices on FHR–MHR and through their correlation and cross-entropy. Univariate and bivariate statistical analysis included nonparametric confidence intervals and statistical tests, receiver operating characteristic curves and linear discriminant analysis. Progression of labor was associated with a significant increase in most MHR and FHR linear indices, whereas entropy indices decreased. FHR alone and in combination with MHR as FHR–MHR evidenced the highest auROC values for prediction of fetal acidemia, with 0.76 and 0.88 for the UAB pH thresholds 7.20 and 7.15, respectively. The inclusion of MHR on bivariate analysis achieved sensitivity and specificity values of nearly 100 and 89.1 %, respectively. These results suggest that simultaneous analysis of MHR and FHR may improve the identification of fetal acidemia compared with FHR alone, namely during the last hour of labor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ayres-de-Campos D, Sousa P, Costa A, Bernardes J (2008) Omniview-SisPorto 3.5—a central fetal monitoring station with online alerts based on computerized cardiotocogram+ST event analysis. J Perinat Med 36:260–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bakker P, van Geijn H (2008) Uterine activity: implications for the condition of the fetus. J Perinat Med 36:30–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernardes J, Costa-Pereira A, Ayres-de-Campos D, van Geijn HP, Pereira-Leite L (1997) Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 57:33–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carter MC (1993) Signal processing and display—cardiotocographs. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 100:21–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. DiPietro JA (2012) Maternal stress in pregnancy: considerations for fetal development. J Adolescent Health 51:S3–S8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dudenhausen JW, Luhr C, Dimer JS (1997) Umbilical artery blood gases in healthy term newborn infants. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 57:251–258

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dudewicz E, Mishra S (1998) Modern mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Georgieva A, Moulden M, Redman CWG (2013) Umbilical cord gases in relation to the neonatal condition: the EveREst plot. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 168:155–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Georgieva A, Papageorghiou AT, Payne SJ, Moulden M, Redman CWG (2014) Phase-rectified signal averaging for intrapartum electronic fetal heart rate monitoring is related to acidaemia at birth. BJOG 121:889–894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gonçalves H, Rocha AP, Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J (2006) Internal versus external intrapartum foetal heart rate monitoring: effect on linear and nonlinear parameters. Physiol Meas 27:307–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gonçalves H, Rocha AP, Ayres-de-Campos D, Bernardes J (2006) Linear and nonlinear fetal heart rate analysis of normal and acidemic fetuses in the minutes preceding delivery. Med Biol Eng Comput 44:847–855

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonçalves H, Henriques-Coelho T, Bernardes J, Rocha AP, Nogueira A, Leite-Moreira A (2008) Linear and nonlinear heart-rate analysis in a rat model of acute anoxia. Physiol Meas 29:1133–1143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gonçalves H, Henriques-Coelho T, Rocha AP, Lourenço AP, Leite-Moreira A, Bernardes J (2013) Comparison of different methods of heart rate entropy analysis during acute anoxia superimposed on a chronic rat model of pulmonary hypertension. Med Eng Phys 35:559–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gonçalves H, Costa A, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa-Santos C, Rocha AP, Bernardes J (2013) Comparison of real beat-to-beat signals with commercially available 4 Hz sampling on the evaluation of foetal heart rate variability. Med Biol Eng Comput 51:665–676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanson L (2010) Risk management in intrapartum fetal monitoring: accidental recording of the maternal heart rate. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 24:7–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hellgren C, Akerud H, Jonsson M, Sundström Poromaa I (2011) Sympathetic reactivity in late pregnancy is related to labour onset in women. STRESS 14:627–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jonsson M, Nordén-Lindeberg S, Östlund I, Hanson U (2008) Acidemia at birth, related to obstetric characteristics and to oxytocin use, during the last two hours of labour. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:745–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kwon JY, Park IY, Shin JC, Song J, Tafreshi R, Lim J (2012) Specific change in spectral power of fetal heart rate variability related to fetal acidemia during labour. Early Hum Dev 88:203–207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu S, Chen X, Kanters JK, Solomon IC, Chon KH (2008) Automatic selection of the threshold value r for approximate entropy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55:1966–1972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Martinez WL, Martinez AR (2002) Computational statistics handbook with MATLAB. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  21. May LE, Suminski RR, Berry A, Langaker MD, Gustafson KM (2014) Maternal physical activity mode and fetal heart outcome. Early Hum Dev 90:365–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Murray ML (2004) Maternal or fetal heart rate? Avoiding intrapartum misidentification. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 33:93–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nurani R, Chandraharan E, Lowe V, Ugwumadu A, Arulkumaran S (2012) Misidentification of maternal heart rate as fetal on cardiotocography during the second stage of labor: the role of the fetal electrocardiograph. Acta Obstet et Gynecol Scand 91:1428–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pincus S (1991) Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:2297–2301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Pincus S, Viscarello R (1992) Approximate entropy: a regularity measure for fetal heart rate analysis. Obstet Gynecol 79:249–255

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pinto P, Bernardes J, Costa-Santos C, Amorim-Costa C, Silva M, Ayres-de-Campos D (2014) Development and evaluation of an algorithm for computer analysis of maternal heart rate during labor. Comput Biol Med 49:30–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Richman JS, Moorman JR (2000) Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 278:H2039–H2049

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sá Couto P, van Meurs W, Bernardes J, Marques de Sá J, Goodwin J (2002) Mathematical model for educational simulation of the oxygen delivery to the fetus. Control Eng Pract 10:59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schulz S, Adochiei FC, Edu IR, Schroeder R, Costin H, Bar KJ, Voss A (2013) Cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory coupling analyses: a review. Philos Tran A Math Phys Eng Sci 371:20120191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sherman DJ, Frenkel E, Kurzweil Y, Padua A, Arieli S, Bahar M (2002) Characteristics of maternal heart rate patterns during labor and delivery. Obstet Gynecol 99:542–547

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. STAN Service Manual (2005) Neoventa, Sweden

  32. Suzuki T, Okamura K, Kimura Y, Watanabe T, Yaegashi N, Murotsuki J, Uehara S, Yajima A (2000) Power spectral analysis of R–R interval variability before and during the sinusoidal heart rate pattern in fetal lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182:1227–1232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Task force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (1996) Heart rate variability—standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Circ 17:354–381

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yeh P, Emary K, Impey L (2012) The relationship between umbilical cord arterial pH and serious adverse neonatal outcome: analysis of 51 519 consecutive validated samples. BJOG 119:824–831

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Hernâni Gonçalves is financed by a post-doctoral grant (SFRH/BPD/69671/2010) from the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hernâni Gonçalves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gonçalves, H., Pinto, P., Silva, M. et al. Toward the improvement in fetal monitoring during labor with the inclusion of maternal heart rate analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 54, 691–699 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1359-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-015-1359-7

Keywords

Navigation