Skip to main content
Log in

Marker-less intra-fraction organ motion tracking using hybrid ASM

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

External beam radiation therapy attempts to deliver a high dose of ionizing radiation to destroy cancerous tissue, while sparing healthy tissues and organs at risk (OAR). Recent advances in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment call for a greater understanding of uncertainties in the treatment process and more rigorous protocols leading to greater precision in treatment delivery. The degree to which this can be achieved depends largely on the cancer site. The treatment of organs comprises soft tissue (e.g. in the abdomen) and those subject to rhythmic movements (e.g. lungs) causing inter and intra-fraction motion artifacts that are particularly problematic. Various methods have been developed to tackle the problems caused by organ motion during radiotherapy treatment, e.g. Real-time position management respiratory gating (Varian) and synchronized moving aperture radiation therapy, developed by researchers at Harvard Medical School.

Objective

The majority of the work focuses on tracking the position of the pathologic region, with the intra-fraction shape variation of the region being largely ignored.

Materials and Methods

This paper proposes a novel method that addresses both the position and shape variation caused by the intra-fraction movement.

Conclusion

We believe this approach is able to reduce the clinical target volume margin, hence, sparing yet more of the surrounding healthy tissues from radiation exposure and limiting irradiation of OAR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stanford Cancer Centre, Stanford Hospital & Clinics, Respiratory Gating, http://cancer.stanfordhospital.com/forPatients/services/radiationTherapy/respiratoryGating/default

  2. Varian Medical Systems, Radiation Therapy, Treatment Delivery, RPM Respiratory Gating. http://www.varian.com/orad/prd057.html

  3. Jaffray DA, Siewerdsen JH, Wong JW and Martinez AA (2002). Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. Int J Rad Onc Biol Phys 53(5): 1337–1349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jaffray DA and Siewerdsen JH (2000). Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: Initial Performance Characterization. Med Phys 27(6): 1311–1323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Siewerdsen JH and Jaffray DA (2000). Optimization of X-ray imaging geometry (with specific application to flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography). Med Phys 27(8): 1903–1914

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Siewerdsen JH and Jaffray DA (1999). Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: effects of image lag. Med Phys 26(12): 2635–2647

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. ELEKTA, Image Guided Radiation Therapy, Elekta Synergy®. http://www.elekta.com/healthcareus.nsf

  8. Varian Medical Systems, Radiation Therapy, Dynamic Targeting IGRT, Dynamic Targeting Image-guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT), Image-Guided Motion Management: a portal to expanding IMRT applications. http://www.varian.com/orad/prd119.html

  9. Khamene A, Bloch P, Wein W, Svatos M, Sauer F (2006) Automatic registration of portal images and volumetric CT for patient positioning in radiotherapy. Med Image Anal 10:96–112, received 23 February 2004; received in revised form 12 August 2004; accepted 10 June 2005; Available online 8 September 2005

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neicu T, Shirato H, Seppenwoolde Y and Jiang SB (2003). Synchronized moving aperture radiation therapy (SMART): average tumour trajectory for lung patients. Phys Med Biol 48: 587–598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang SB, Pope C, Al Jarrah KM, Kung JH, Bortfeld T and Chen GTY (2003). An experimental investigation on intra-fractional organ motion effects in lung IMRT treatment. Phys Med Biol 48: 1773–1784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharp GC, Jiang SB, Shimizu S and Shirato H (2004). Prediction of respiratory tumour motion for real-time image-guided radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 49: 425–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berbeco RI, Jiang SB, Sharp GC, Chen GTY, Mostafavi H and Shirato H (2004). Integrated radiotherapy imaging system (iris): design considerations of tumour tracking with linac gantry-mounted diagnostic X-ray systems with flat-panel detectors. Phys Med Biol 49: 243–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. TracKnife, TrackLeaf, TrackBeam, TracX, InitiaRT, a division of Initia Medical Technologies. http://www.tracknife.com/

  15. Siemens Introduces ARTÍSTE, an integrated dose-guided radiation therapy solution. http://www.medical.siemens.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/PressReleaseView?langId=-1&storeId=10001&catalogId=-1&catTree=100005,13839&pageId=53023

  16. Fisher B (1999) 2-D Deformable template models: a review, http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/CVonline/LOCAL_COPIES/ZHONG1/node1.html

  17. Cootes TF, Taylor CJ, Cooper DH and Graham J (1995). Active shape models—their training and application. Comput Vis Image Underst 61: 38–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cootes TF, Edwards GJ and Taylor CJ (2001). Active appearance models. IEEE PAMI 23(6): 681–685

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cootes TF, Taylor CJ, Constrained active appearance models. In: Proc ICCV 2001, vol I, pp 748–754

  20. Cootes TF, Hill A, Taylor CJ and Haslam J (1994). The use of active shape models for locating structures in medical images. Image Vis Comput 12(6): 355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cootes TF, Taylor CJ (2001) Statistical models of appearance for medical image analysis and computer vision. Proc SPIE Med Imaging

  22. Cootes TF, Kittipanya-ngam P (2002) Comparing variations on the active appearance model algorithm. In: Proc BMVC vol 2, pp 837–846

  23. Blake A and Isard M (1998). Active contours; the application of techniques from graphics, vision, control theory and statistics to visual tracking of shapes in motion. Springer, Heidelberg ISBN:3-540-76217-5

    Google Scholar 

  24. Derraz F, Belkaid AB, Beladgham M, Khelif M (2004) Application of active contour models in medical image segmentation. In: International conference on information technology: coding and computing (ITCC’04), vol 2, p 675

  25. Cootes TF, Wheeler GV, Walker KN, Taylor CJ (2000) Coupled-view active appearance models. In: Proc British machine vision conference 2000, vol 1, pp 52–61

  26. Lapeer RJ, Rowland RS, Chen MS (2004) PC-based volume rendering for medical visualisation and augmented reality based surgical navigation. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on information visualisation (IV04), July 14–16 2004. IEEE/Computer Society Press, London, ISBN 0-7695-2177-0

  27. Rowland RS, 3D volume viewer. http://www.rmrsystems.co.uk/imaging.htm

  28. MAESTRO project website for public. http://www.maestro-research.org/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Su.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Su, Y., Fisher, M.H. & Rowland, R.S. Marker-less intra-fraction organ motion tracking using hybrid ASM. Int J CARS 2, 231–243 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-007-0133-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-007-0133-1

Keywords

Navigation