Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multiple CT-reconstructions for locally adaptive anisotropic wavelet denoising

  • Original article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective:

The signal-to-noise ratio in computed tomography (CT) data should be improved by using adaptive noise estimation for level-dependent threshold determination in the wavelet domain.

Method:

The projection data measured in CT and, thus, the slices reconstructed from these data are noisy. For a reliable diagnosis and subsequent image processing, like segmentation, the ratio between relevant tissue contrasts and the noise amplitude must be sufficiently large. By separate reconstructions from disjoint subsets of projections, e.g. even and odd numbered projections, two CT volumes can be computed, which only differ with respect to noise. We show that these images allow a position and orientation adaptive noise estimation for level-dependent threshold determination in the wavelet domain. The computed thresholds are applied to the averaged wavelet coefficients of the input data.

Results:

The final result contains data from the complete set of projections, but shows approximately 50% improvement in signal-to-noise ratio.

Conclusions:

The proposed noise reduction method adapts itself to the noise power in the images and allows for the reduction of spatially varying and oriented noise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Borsdorf A, Raupach R and Hornegger J (2006). Wavelet based noise reduction by identification of correlation. In: Franke, K, Müller, K, Nickolay, B, and Schäfer, R (eds) Pattern recognition (DAGM 2006), Lecture notes in computer science, vol 4174, pp 21–30. Springer, Berlin,

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borsdorf A, Raupach R and Hornegger J (2007). Separate CT-reconstruction for orientation and position adaptive wavelet denoising. In: Horsch, A, Deserno, T, Handels, H, Meinzer, H, and Tolxdoff, T (eds) Bildverarbeitung fnr die Medizin 2007, pp 232–236. Springer, Berlin,

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruder H, Stierstorfer K, McCullough C, Raupach R, Petersilka~M, Grasruck M, Suess C, Ohnesorge B, Flohr T (2006) Design considerations in cardiac CT. In: Flynn M, Hsieh J (eds) Medical imaging 2006: physics of medical imaging. Proceedings of the SPIE, vol 6142, pp 151–163

  4. Buzug T (2004). Einführung in die Computertomographie. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coifman RR, Donoho DL (1995) Translation-invariant de-noising. In: Lecture notes in statistics: wavelets and statistics, vol 103, pp 125–150

  6. Cunningham IA and Reid BK (1992). Signal and noise in modulation transfer function determinations using the slit, wire and edge techniques. Medi Phys 19(4): 1037–1044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Daubechies I (1992). Ten lectures on wavelets. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  8. Demirkaya O (2001) Reduction of noise and image artifacts in computed tomography by nonlinear filtration of projection images. In: Sonka M, Hanson KM (eds) Proc SPIE, vol 4322. Medical imaging 2001: image processing, pp 917–923

  9. Donoho DL and Johnstone IM (1994). Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81(3): 425–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fessler J, Ficaro E, Clinthorne N and Lange K (1997). Grouped- coordinate ascent algorithms for penalized-likelihoodtransmission image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 16(2): 166–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hsieh J (1998). Adaptive streak artifact reduction in computed tomography resulting from excessive X-ray photon noise. Medi Phys 25(11): 2139–2147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kachelrieß M, Watzke O and Kalender WA (2001). Generalized multi-dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single-slice, multi-slice, and cone-beam CT. Medi Phys 28(4): 475–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kak A, Slanely M (2001) Principles of computerized tomographic imaging. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. http://www.slaney.org/pct/pct-toc.html

  14. Kalender W (2000). Computed tomography. Publics MCD Werbeagentur GmbH, Munich

    Google Scholar 

  15. La Rivire P, Bian J and Vargas P (2006). Penalized-likelihood sinogram restoration for computed tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 25(8): 1022–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li T, Li X, Wang J, Wen J, Lu H, Hsieh J and Liang Z (2004). Nonlinear sinogram smoothing for low-dose X-ray CT. IEEE Trans Nuclear Sci 51(5): 2505–2512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu H, Li X, Li L, Chen D, Xing Y, Hsieh J, Liang Z (2003) Adaptive noise reduction toward low-dose computed tomography. In: Yaffe MJ, Antonuk LE (eds) Medical imaging 2003: physics of medical imaging. Presented at the society of photo-optical instrumentation engineers (SPIE) conference, vol 5030, pp 759–766

  18. Mallat SG (1989). A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 11(7): 674–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mathworks Inc (2006) Wavelet Toolbox. http://www.mathworks.com/products/wavelet/

  20. Rust GF, Aurich V, Reiser M (2002) Noise/dose reduction and image improvements in screening virtual colonoscopy with tube currents of 20 mAs with nonlinear Gaussian filter chains. In: Clough AV, Chen CT (eds) Proc SPIE, vol 4683. Medical imaging 2002: physiology and function from multidimensional images, pp 186–197

  21. Stierstorfer K, Flohr T and Bruder H (2002). Segmented multiple plane reconstruction: a novel approximate reconstruction scheme for multi-slice spiral CT. Phys Med Biol 47(4): 2571–2581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Stierstorfer K, Rauscher A, Boese J, Bruder H, Schaller S and Flohr T (2004). Weighted FBP—a simple approximate 3DFBP algorithm for multislice spiral CT with good dose usage for arbitrary pitch. Phys Med Biol 49(11): 2209–2218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Strang G and Nguyen T (1996). Wavelets and Filter Banks. Cambridge Press, Wellesley

    Google Scholar 

  24. Weisstein EW (2006) Variance. From MathWorld—A Wolfram Web resource. http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Variance.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Pattern Recognition, Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany

    Anja Borsdorf & Joachim Hornegger

  2. Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany

    Rainer Raupach

Authors
  1. Anja Borsdorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rainer Raupach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joachim Hornegger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anja Borsdorf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borsdorf, A., Raupach, R. & Hornegger, J. Multiple CT-reconstructions for locally adaptive anisotropic wavelet denoising. Int J CARS 2, 255–264 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-007-0139-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-007-0139-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation