Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Combined motion blur and partial volume correction for computer aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules in PET/CT

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

We present an automated scheme to correct PET max-uptake-values of small to medium-sized pulmonary nodules for motion blur and partial volume averaging. Both effects cause significant underestimation of PET max-uptake-values, particularly in nodules below 25 mm diameter, but nodules up to 75 mm might be affected. This compromises the power of PET for the differential diagnosis of such nodules, in particular benign versus malignant. Thus, correcting PET max-uptake-values has the potential to improve the classification of PET-positive pulmonary nodules.

Methods

The proposed correction algorithm relies on (i) determination of the actual size and shape of the nodule by segmentation of the nodule in the CT image and (ii) estimation of the effective local point-spread-function in the PET image, taking into account not only the inherently limited spatial resolution of the PET scanner, but also respiratory motion effects. Then the expected under-estimation of the PET max-uptake value in the nodule can be computed by simulation, and the correct PET max-uptake is obtained by multiplication with the correction factor (inverse of the under-estimation/recovery factor).

Results

Depending on the estimated nodule shape and blur width, the resulting SUV correction factors ranged from 1.0 to 11, with an average correction factor of 3.0, with higher values for smaller nodules. In comparison to SUV correction using a simplified spherical nodule model, the true-shape SUV correction factors were on average 30% higher. The feasibility of the method presented here is indicated by the high correlation between fitted and observed PET image profiles for clinical cases (average 0.995).

Conclusion

Blur and motion correction factors for standardized PET uptake values may significantly change the differential diagnosis of small pulmonary nodules. Feasibility and stability of the proposed automated combined SUV correction method as well as ease of use of the software tool have been demonstrated by retrospective analysis of real PET/CT patient datasets from clinical routine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Minn H, Zasadny KR, Quint LE, Wahl RL (1995) Lung cancer: reproducibility of quantitative measurements for evaluating 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake in PET. Radiology 198(1): 167–173

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rigo P, Hustinx R, Bury T (2006) PET and PET/CT imaging in lung cancer. In: Valk P, Delbeke D, Bailey DL, Townsend DW, Maisey MN (eds) Positron emission tomography—clinical practice. Springer, London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gould MK, Maclean CC, Kuschner WG, Rydzak CE, Owens DK (2001) Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta analysis. JAMA 285: 914–924

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Erasmus JJ, McAdams HP, Patz EF Jr, Coleman RE, Ahuja V, Goodman PC (1998) Evaluation of primary pulmonary carcinoid tumor using FDG-PET. AJR 170: 1369–1373

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nie Y, Li Q, Li F, Pu Y, Appelbaum D, Doi K (2006) Integrating PET and CT information to improve diagnostic accuracy for lung nodules: a semiautomatic computer-aided method. J Nucl Med 47: 1075–1080

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Herder GJ, Golding RP, Koekstra OS, Comans EF, Teule GJ, Postmus PE, Smit EF (2004) The performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in small solitary pulmonary nodules. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31(9): 1231–1236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoffman EJ, Huang SC, Phelps ME (1979) Quantitation in positron emission computed tomography: 1. Effect of object size. J Comput Assist Tomogr 3: 299–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kessler RM, Ellis JR Jr, Eden M (1984) Analysis of emission tomographic scan data: limitations imposed by resolution and background. J Comput Assist Tomogr 8: 514–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I (2007) Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. J Nucl Med 48(6): 932–945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Keyes JW (1995) SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value?. J Nucl Med 36: 1836–1839

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Basu S, Alavi A (2007) Partial volume correction of standardized uptake values and the dual time point in FDG-PET imaging: should these be routinely employed in assessing patients with cancer?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34(19): 1527–1529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vik T, Kabus S, von Berg J, Ens K, Dries S, Klinder T, Lorenz C Validation and comparison of registration methods for free-breathing 4D lung-CT. In: Proceedings of SPIE 2008 medical imaging conference, vol 6914. SPIE, San Diego

  13. Klinder T, Lorenz C, von Berg J, Renisch S, Ostermann J (2008) 4D-CT image-based lung motion field extraction and analysis. In: Proceedings of SPIE 2008 medical imaging conference, vol 6914. SPIE, San Diego

  14. Hickeson M, Yun M, Matthies A, Zhuang H, Adam LE, Lacorte L, Alavi A (2002) Use of corrected standardized uptake value based on the lesion size on CT permits accurate characterization of lung nodules on FDG-PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29(12): 1639–1647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. El Naqa I, Low DA, Bradley JD, Visic M, Deasy JO (2006) Deblurring of breathing motion artefacts in thoracic PET images by deconvolution methods. Med Phys 33(10): 3587–3600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bülow T, Arbash Meinel L, Wiemker R, Kose U, Shimauchi A, Newstead G (2007) Segmentation of suspicious lesions in dynamic, contrast-enhanced breast MR images. In: Proceedings of SPIE 2007 medical imaging conference, vol 6514. SPIE, San Diego

  17. Wiemker R, Rogalla P, Blaffert T, Sifri D, Hay O, Shah E, Truyen R, Fleiter T (2005) Aspects of computer aided detection (CAD) and volumetry of pulmonary nodules using multislice CT. Br J Radiol 78(special issue):S46–S56

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wiemker R, Wormanns D, Beyer F, Blaffert T, Bülow T (2005) Improved sensitivity of dynamic CT with a new visualization method for radial distribution of lung nodule enhancement. In: Proceedings of SPIE 2005 medical imaging conference, vol 5746. SPIE, San Diego, pp 486–497

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Philips Research Europe-Hamburg, Röntgenstrasse 24, 22335, Hamburg, Germany

    Rafael Wiemker, Timo Paulus, Sven Kabus & Thomas Bülow

  2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

    Ivayla Apostolova, Ralph Buchert & Susanne Klutmann

Authors
  1. Rafael Wiemker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Timo Paulus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sven Kabus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thomas Bülow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ivayla Apostolova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ralph Buchert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Susanne Klutmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Wiemker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiemker, R., Paulus, T., Kabus, S. et al. Combined motion blur and partial volume correction for computer aided diagnosis of pulmonary nodules in PET/CT. Int J CARS 3, 105–113 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-008-0212-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-008-0212-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation