Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automated pancreas segmentation from three-dimensional contrast-enhanced computed tomography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We propose an automated pancreas segmentation algorithm from contrast-enhanced multiphase computed tomography (CT) and verify its effectiveness in segmentation.

Methods

The algorithm is characterized by three unique ideas. First, a two-stage segmentation strategy with spatial standardization of pancreas was employed to reduce variations in the pancreas shape and location. Second, patient- specific probabilistic atlas guided segmentation was developed to cope with the remaining variability in shape and location. Finally, a classifier ensemble was incorporated to refine the rough segmentation results.

Results

The effectiveness of the proposed algorithm was validated with 20 unknown CT volumes, as well as three on-site CT volumes distributed in a competition of pancreas segmentation algorithms. The experimental results indicated that the segmentation performance was enhanced by the proposed algorithm, and the Jaccard index between an extracted pancreas and a true one was 57.9%.

Conclusions

This study verified the effectiveness of two-stage segmentation with spatial standardization of pancreas in delineating the pancreas region, patient-specific probabilistic atlas guided segmentation in reducing false negatives, and a classifier ensemble in boosting segmentation performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nakaguchi T, Okui M, Tsumura N et al (2004) Pancreas extraction using a deformable model on abdominal CT image. International Workshop on Nonlinear Circuits and Signal Processing, pp 387–390

  2. Kitasaka T, Sakashita M, Mori K et al (2008) A method for extracting pancreas regions from four-phase contrasted 3D abdominal CT images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 3(Suppl 1): S40

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shimizu A, Ohno R, Ikegami T et al (2007) Segmentation of multiple organs in non-contrast 3D abdominal CT images. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surgery 2(3–4): 135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shimizu A, Kubo M, Furukawa D et al (2008) Abdomen standardization for multi-organ segmentation of CT volumes. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 3(Suppl 1): s195–s196

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shimizu A, Nawano S, Shinozaki K et al (2009) Medical imaging competitions in Japan. In: Proceedings of world congress on medical physics and biomedical engineering (to appear)

  6. Shimizu A, Kimoto T, Furukawa D et al (2008) Pancreas segmentation in three-phase abdominal CT volume data. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 3(Suppl 1): s393–s394

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shimizu A, Kimoto T, Kobatake H et al (2009) Patient-specific atlas-guided pancreas segmentation from three-dimensional contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Suppl (to appear)

  8. Ericsson A, Aljabar P, Rueckert D (2008) Construction of a patient-specific atlas of the brain: application to normal aging. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, pp 480–483

  9. Shimizu A, Narihira T, Furukawa D et al (2008) Ensemble segmentation using AdaBoost with application to liver lesion extraction from a CT volume. In: Proceedings of workshop in MICCAI2008. http://grand-challenge2008.bigr.nl/proceedings/

  10. Niessen W, Walsum T, Schaap M et al (2008) 3D segmentation in the clinic: a grand challenge II. In: Proceedings of workshop in MICCAI2008. http://grand-challenge2008.bigr.nl/

  11. Maintz J, Viergever M (1998) A survey of medical image registration. Med Image Anal 2: 1–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fornefett M, Rohr K, Sprengel R et al (1998) Elastic medical image registration using orientation attributes at landmarks. In: Proceedings of the medical image understanding and analysis, pp 49–52

  13. Feldmar J, Declerck J, Malandain G et al (1996) Extension of the ICP algorithm to nonrigid intensity-based registration of 3D volumes. Comput Vis Image Underst 66(2): 193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cootes T, Taylor C, Cooper D et al (1995) Active shape models—their training and application. Comput Vis Image Underst 61: 38–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang J, Staib L, Duncan J (2004) Neighbor-constrained segmentation with level set based 3-D deformable models. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23(8): 940–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saito T, Toriwaki J (1994) New algorithms for euclidean distance transformation of an n-dimensional digitized picture with applications. Pattern Recognit 27(11): 1551–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Murata N, Takenouchi T, Kanamori T et al (2004) Information geometry of U-Boost and Bregman divergence. Neural Comput 16(7): 1437–1481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Narihira T, Shimizu A, Furukawa D et al (2009) Boosting algorithms for segmentation of metastatic liver tumors in contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg (accepted)

  19. Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12(7): 629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ginneken B, Heimann T, Styner M (2007) 3D segmentation in the clinic: a grand challenge MICCAI workshop on 3D segmentation in the clinic. http://mbi.dkfz-heidelberg.de/grand-challenge2007/web/p7.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akinobu Shimizu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shimizu, A., Kimoto, T., Kobatake, H. et al. Automated pancreas segmentation from three-dimensional contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Int J CARS 5, 85–98 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-009-0384-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-009-0384-0

Keywords

Navigation