Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Liver segmentation for contrast-enhanced MR images using partitioned probabilistic model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Liver volume segmentation is important in computer assisted diagnosis and therapy planning of liver tumors. Manual segmentation is time-consuming, tedious and error prone, so automated methods are needed. Automatic segmentation of MR images is more challenging than for CT images, so a robust system was developed.

Methods

An intensity-based segmentation method that uses probabilistic model to increase the precision of the segmentation was developed. The model was build based on 60 manually contoured liver CT exams and partitioned into 8 parts according to the (Couinaud) segmental anatomy of the liver. The partitioning allows using different intensity statistics in different parts of the organ, which makes it insensitive to local intensity differences from MR artifacts or pathology. The method employs a modality independent model with registration that exploits some LAVA image characteristics. This dependence can be eliminated to adapt the segmentation method for a wide range of MR images.

Results

The method was evaluated using eight representative, manually segmented MR LAVA exams. The results show that the method can accurately segment the liver volume despite various MR artifacts and pathology. The evaluation shows that the proposed method provides more precise segmentation (6% average absolute relative volume error) compared with global intensity statistics for the whole organ (20% average absolute relative volume error). The compute time of the method was 30 s in average, which is acceptable for wide range of clinical applications.

Conclusion

An automatic method that can segment the liver in contrast-enhanced MR LAVA images was developed and tested. The results demonstrate that the method is feasible, efficient and robust to artifacts and pathology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Furukawa D, Shimizu A, Kobatake H (2007) Segmentation method based on maximum a posterior probability estimation and level set method. In: MICCAI 2007 workshop proceedings: 3D segmentation in the clinic. 117–124

  2. Rusko L, Bekes G, Fidrich M (2009) Automatic segmentation of the liver from multi- and single-phase contrast-enhanced CT images. Med Image Anal 13(6): 871–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Heimann T, Meinzer HP (2009) Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: A review. Med Image Anal 13(4): 543–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Seghers D, Loeckx D, Maes F, Vandermeulen D, Suetens P (2007) Minimal shape and intensity cost path segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 26(8): 1115–1129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Rikxoort E, Arzhaeva Y, van Ginneken B (2007) Automatic segmentation of the liver in computed tomography scans with voxel classification and atlas matching. In: MICCAI 2007 workshop proceedings: 3D segmentation in the clinic. 101–108

  6. Kainmuller D, Lange T, Lamecker H (2007) Shape constrained automatic segmentation of the liver based on a heuristic intensity model. In: MICCAI 2007 workshop proceedings: 3D segmentation in the clinic. 117–124

  7. Li H, Elmoataz A, Fadili J, Ruan S (2003) An improved image segmentation approach based on level set and mathematical morphology. In: Proceedings of SPIE vol 5286. 851–854

  8. Farraher SW, Jara H, Chang KK, Hou A, Soto JA (2005) Liver and spleen volumetry with quantitative mr imaging and dual-space clustering segmentation. Radiology 237(1): 322–328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hermoye L, Laamari-Azjal I, Cao Z, Annet L, Lerut J, Dawant BM, Beers BEV (2005) Liver segmentation in living liver transplant donors: Comparison of semiautomatic and manual methods. Radiology 234: 171–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bismuth H (1982) Surgical anatomy and anatomical surgery of the liver. World J Surg 6(1): 3–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Heimann T, van Ginneken B, Styner MA, Arzhaeva Y, Aurich V, Bauer C, Beck A, Becker C, Beichel R, Bekes G, Bello F, Binnig G, Bischof H, Bornik A, Cashman P, Chi Y, Cordova A, Dawant BM, Fidrich M, Furst JD, Furukawa D, Grenacher L, Hornegger J, Kainmuller D, Kitney RI, Kobatake H, Lamecker H, Lange T, Lee J, Lennon B, Li R, Li S, Meinzer H-P, Nemeth G, Raicu DS, Rau A-M, van Rikxoort EM, Rousson M, Rusko L, Saddi KA, Schmidt G, Seghers D, Shimizu A, Slagmolen P, Sorantin E, Soza G, Susomboon R, Waite JM, Wimmer A, Wolf I (2009) Comparison and Evaluation of Methods for Liver Segmentation From CT Datasets. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 28(8): 1251–1265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GE Hungary, Budapest, Hungary

    László Ruskó & György Bekes

Authors
  1. László Ruskó
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. György Bekes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to László Ruskó.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruskó, L., Bekes, G. Liver segmentation for contrast-enhanced MR images using partitioned probabilistic model. Int J CARS 6, 13–20 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0493-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0493-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation