Skip to main content
Log in

The integrated OR Efficiency and effectiveness evaluation after two years use, a pilot study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Technology evaluation of integrated/digital OR is needed since very little literature has been published on the subject. The integrated OR is a technological solution intended for minimally invasive surgery where the surgeons have complete control of the environment, devices and image distribution. Before such an investment, Health Technology Assessment can be used as a method to evaluate what vendors’ state, i.e. the fact that the integrated OR is a very effective and efficient solution. Then a follow-up evaluation could be useful after the installation to test the users’ satisfaction and give suggestions to the community about real- experienced integrated OR advantage.

Methods

A multiple answer questionnaire has been handed to 17 surgeons and 9 scrub nurses form Varese Town and University Hospital to evaluate the degree of satisfaction after 2 years of use of integrated ORs.

Results

Surgeons and scrub nurses agree that the integrated OR can be very effective in increasing quality, risk reduction and surgery time reduction through the use of digitalized video acquisition system, boom-mounted devices and multiple displays. Scrub nurses are a little bit more confident than surgeons that medical device control could reduce the confusion inside the OR and reduce the number of setting errors. A very positive judgment was given to the system’s teaching capabilities, but both surgeons and scrub nurses agree that a great degree of education and a cultural change are needed to use the system in a correct and complete way.

Conclusions

Results show that there is a deep appreciation of the system which proved to be efficient (reducing surgery time and enhancing surgical quality) and effective. This is a pilot study based on few collected data, but the questionnaire could be handed to many hospitals where integrated ORs are present, in order to achieve a significant degree of assessment and find common topics to be considered fundamental especially in the evaluating phase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Batista R, Hodge MJ (1999) The evolving paradigm of health technology assessment: reflections for the millennium. JAMC 160(10): 1464–1467

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jannin P, Korb W (2008) Assessment of image-guided interventions. In: Peters TM, Cleary K (eds) Image-guided intervention principles and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 531–549

    Google Scholar 

  3. European network for Health Technology Assessment. http://www.eunethta.net/

  4. Kidholm K, Ehlers L, Korsbek L, Kjærby R, Beck M (2009) Assessment of the quality of mini-HTA. Int J Tech Assess Health Care 25: 42–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ibach B, Zimolong A, Portheine F, Neithard FU, Radermacher K (2006) Integrated medical workstations for Computer Integrated Smart Surgery (CISS)—state of the art, bottlenecks and approaches. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 1(suppl 1): 449–451

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nocco U, Cocozza G, Sivo M, Peta G (2007) Video and LAN solutions for a Digital OR. The Varese experience. In: SPIE Proceedings, vol 6516

  7. OR Integration (2007) What it is and what it isn’t. Health Devices 36(9):281–286

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meyer M, Levine WC, Brzezinski P, Robbins J, Lai F, Spitz G, Sandberg WS (2005) Integration of hospital information systems, operative and peri-operative information systems, and operative equipment into a single information display. In: AMIA annual symposium proceedings. p 1054

  9. Nocco U, Mezzacapo A, Castelli R, Lettieri E, Tanzi F, Novario R (2006) Implementing a digital acquisition system in a new hospital. First step for a surgical PACS? Int J of comput Assist Radiol Surg 1(suppl 1):486

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nocco U, Lettieri E, Cassoli P (2008) La sala operatoria integrata: miraggio tecnologico o valore sostenibile?. Tec Osp 2: 56–63

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schafmayer A, Lehmann-Beckow D, Holzner M (2002) Process-optimized operating room: implementation of an integrated OR system into clinical routine. Surg Echnol Int 10: 67–70

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vigeant D, Lefebvre H, Reidy M (2008) The use of video as a pedagogic tool for the training of peri-operative nurses: a literature review. Can Oper Room Nurs J 26(1): 8–9 14–15, 17–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Krautscheid LC (2008) Improving communication among healthcare providers: preparing student nurses for practice. Int J Nurs Educ Scolarsh 5 Article 40, Epub 2008 Oct 21

  14. Medical Device Plug & Play Interoperability Program—www.mdpnp.org/Home_Page.php

  15. DICOM strategic document—version 9.5, March 30, 2009 http://medical.nema.org/geninfo/Strategy.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Umberto Nocco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nocco, U., del Torchio, S. The integrated OR Efficiency and effectiveness evaluation after two years use, a pilot study. Int J CARS 6, 175–186 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0496-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-010-0496-6

Keywords

Navigation