Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Using the low-pass monogenic signal framework for cell/background classification on multiple cell lines in bright-field microscope images

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

   Several cell detection approaches which deal with bright-field microscope images utilize defocusing to increase image contrast. The latter is related to the physical light phase through the transport of intensity equation (TIE). Recently, it was shown that it is possible to approximate the solution of the TIE using a low-pass monogenic signal framework. The purpose of this paper is to show that using the local phase of the aforementioned monogenic signal instead of the defocused image improves the cell/background classification accuracy.

Materials and methods

   The paper statement was tested on an image database composed of three cell lines: adherent CHO, adherent L929, and Sf21 in suspension. Local phase and local energy images were generated using the low-pass monogenic signal framework with axial derivative images as input. Machine learning was then employed to investigate the discriminative power of the local phase. Three classifier models were utilized: random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM) with a linear kernel, and SVM with a radial basis function (RBF) kernel.

Results

   The improvement, averaged over cell lines, of classifying \(5 \times 5\) sized patches extracted from the local phase image instead of the defocused image was \(7.3\) % using the RF, \(11.6\) % using the linear SVM, and \(10.2\) % when a RBF kernel was employed instead of the linear one. Furthermore, the feature images can be sorted by increasing discriminative power as follows: at-focus signal, local energy, defocused signal, local phase. The only exception to this order was the superiority of local energy over defocused signal for suspended cells.

Conclusions

   Local phase computed using the low-pass monogenic signal framework considerably outperforms the defocused image for the purpose of pixel-patch cell/background classification in bright-field microscopy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. There is a minus sign difference due to the incompatibility of the definitions between different authors [8, 19]. This incompatibility, however, is irrelevant for the discriminative power.

References

  1. Agero U, Monken CH, Ropert C, Gazzinelli RT, Mesquita ON (2003) Cell surface fluctuations studied with defocusing microscopy. Phys Rev E 67(5):051904

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ali R, Gooding M, Szilágyi T, Vojnovic B, Christlieb M, Brady M (2012) Automatic segmentation of adherent biological cell boundaries and nuclei from brightfield microscopy images. Mach Vis Appl 23(4):607–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ali R, Szilagyi T, Gooding M, Christlieb M, Brady M (2010) On the use of low-pass filters for image processing with inverse Laplacian models. J Math Imaging Vis 43:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Becattini G, Mattos L, Caldwell D (2011) A novel framework for automated targeting of unstained living cells in bright field microscopy. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: from nano to macro, pp 195–198

  5. Boukerroui D, Noble JA, Brady M (2004) On the choice of band-pass quadrature filters. J Math Imaging Vis 21(1–2):53–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Breiman L (2011) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chang CC, Lin CJ (2001) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 2(3):27:1–27:27. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm

  8. Felsberg M, Sommer G (2001) The monogenic signal. IEEE Trans Signal Process 49(12):3136–3144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamilton WR (1844) II. On quaternions; or on a new system of imaginaries in algebra. Lond Edinb Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 25(163):10–13

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sjöström Jesper P, Frydel B, Wahlberg L (1999) Artificial neural network-aided image analysis system for cell counting. Cytometry 36(1):18–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khoshgoftaar T, Golawala M, Van Hulse J (2007) An empirical study of learning from imbalanced data using random forest. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Tools with, Artificial Intelligence, vol 2, pp 310–317

  12. Long X, Cleveland W, Yao Y (2005) A new preprocessing approach for cell recognition. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 9(3):407–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Long X, Cleveland W, Yao Y (2006) Automatic detection of unstained viable cells in bright field images using a support vector machine with an improved training procedure. Comput Biol Med 36(4):339–362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mellor M, Brady M (2005) Phase mutual information as a similarity measure for registration. Med Image Anal 9(4):330–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morrone MC, Ross J, Burr DC, Owens R (1986) Mach bands are phase dependent. Nature 324(6094):250–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mualla F, Schöll S, Sommerfeldt B, Maier A, Hornegger J (2013) Automatic cell detection in bright-field microscope images using SIFT, random forests, and hierarchical clustering. IEEE Trans Med Image 32(12):2274–2286. doi:10.1109/TMI.2013.2280380

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nattkemper T, Ritter H, Schubert W (1999) Extracting patterns of lymphocyte fluorescence from digital microscope images. Intell Data Anal Med Pharmacol 99:79–88

    Google Scholar 

  18. Popescu G (2011) Quantitative phase imaging of cells and tissues. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Poularikas AD (2010) Handbook of formulas and tables for signal processing, vol 13. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  20. Russell B, Torralba A, Murphy K, Freeman W (2008) Labelme: a database and web-based tool for image annotation. Int J Comput Vis 77(1):157–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scholkopf B, Smola AJ (eds) (2001) Learning with kernels. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stein EM (1970) Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions Elias M. Stein, vol 2. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  23. Teague MR (1983) Deterministic phase retrieval: a green’s function solution. J Opt Soc Am 73(11):1434–1441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tscherepanow M, Zöllner F, Hillebrand M, Kummert F (2008) Automatic segmentation of unstained living cells in bright-field microscope images. In: Advances in mass data analysis of images and signals in medicine, biotechnology, chemistry and food industry (Lecture notes in computer science), vol 5108. Springer, Berlin, pp 158–172

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Bavarian Research Foundation BFS for funding the project COSIR under contract number AZ-917-10. In addition, we gratefully acknowledge funding of the Erlangen Graduate School in Advanced Optical Technologies (SAOT) by the German Research Foundation (DFG) in the framework of the German excellence initiative.

Conflict of interest

Firas Mualla, Andreas Maier, Stefan Steidl, Rainer Buchholz, and Joachim Hornegger declare that they have no conflict of interest. Simon Schöll is employee of ASTRUM IT GmbH, Erlangen, Germany. Björn Sommerfeldt is financed by the Bavarian Research Foundation until the end of December 2013.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Firas Mualla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mualla, F., Schöll, S., Sommerfeldt, B. et al. Using the low-pass monogenic signal framework for cell/background classification on multiple cell lines in bright-field microscope images. Int J CARS 9, 379–386 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0969-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0969-5

Keywords

Navigation