Skip to main content
Log in

Registration of a statistical model to intraoperative ultrasound for scaphoid screw fixation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Volar percutaneous scaphoid fracture fixation is conventionally performed under fluoroscopy-based guidance, where surgeons need to mentally determine a trajectory for the insertion of the screw and its depth based on a series of 2D projection images. In addition to challenges associated with mapping 2D information to a 3D space, the process involves exposure to ionizing radiation. Three-dimensional ultrasound has been suggested as an alternative imaging tool for this procedure; however, it has not yet been integrated into clinical routine since ultrasound only provides a limited view of the scaphoid and its surrounding anatomy.

Methods

We propose a registration of a statistical wrist shape + scale + pose model to a preoperative CT and intraoperative ultrasound to derive a patient-specific 3D model for guiding scaphoid fracture fixation. The registered model is then used to determine clinically important intervention parameters, including the screw length and the trajectory of screw insertion in the scaphoid bone.

Results

Feasibility experiments are performed using 13 cadaver wrists. In 10 out of 13 cases, the trajectory of screw suggested by the registered model meets all clinically important intervention parameters. Overall, an average 94 % of maximum allowable screw length is obtained based on the measurements from gold standard CT. Also, we obtained an average 92 % successful volar accessibility, which indicates that the trajectory is not obstructed by the surrounding trapezium bone.

Conclusions

These promising results indicate that determining clinically important screw insertion parameters for scaphoid fracture fixation is feasible using 3D ultrasound imaging. This suggests the potential of this technology in replacing fluoroscopic guidance for this procedure in future applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anas EMA, Rasoulian A, John PS, Pichora DR, Rohling R, Abolmaesumi P (2014) A statistical shape+ pose model for segmentation of wrist CT images. SPIE Med Imaging 9034:T1–8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anas EMA, Seitel A, Rasoulian A, John PS, Pichora D, Darras K, Wilson D, Lessoway VA, Hacihaliloglu I, Mousavi P, Rohling R, Abolmaesumi P (2015) Bone enhancement in ultrasound using local spectrum variations for guiding percutaneous scaphoid fracture fixation procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(6):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arora R, Gschwentner M, Krappinger D, Lutz M, Blauth M, Gabl M (2007) Fixation of nondisplaced scaphoid fractures: making treatment cost effective. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(1):39–46

  4. Beek M, Abolmaesumi P, Luenam S, Ellis RE, Sellens RW, Pichora DR (2008) Validation of a new surgical procedure for percutaneous scaphoid fixation using intra-operative ultrasound. Med Image Anal 12(2):152–162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bossa M, Olmos S (2007) Multi-object statistical pose+ shape models. In: 4th IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: from nano to macro. IEEE, pp 1204–1207

  6. Brudfors M, Seitel A, Rasoulian A, Lasso A, Lessoway VA, Osborn J, Maki A, Rohling RN, Abolmaesumi P (2015) Towards real-time, tracker-less 3D ultrasound guidance for spine anaesthesia. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10(6):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dodds SD, Panjabi MM, Slade JF (2006) Screw fixation of scaphoid fractures: a biomechanical assessment of screw length and screw augmentation. J Hand Surg 31(3):405–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Duckworth AD, Jenkins PJ, Aitken SA, Clement ND, McQueen MM (2012) Scaphoid fracture epidemiology. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72(2):E41–E45

  9. Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R (2012) 3D slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging 30(9):1323–1341

  10. Garcia RM, Ruch DS (2014) Management of scaphoid fractures in the athlete: open and percutaneous fixation. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 22(1):22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lasso A, Heffter T, Rankin A, Pinter C, Ungi T, Fichtinger G (2014) Plus: open-source toolkit for ultrasound-guided intervention systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 61(10):2527–2537

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Leventhal EL, Wolfe SW, Walsh EF, Crisco JJ (2009) A computational approach to the “optimal” screw axis location and orientation in the scaphoid bone. J Hand Surg 34(4):677–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liverneaux PA, Gherissi A, Stefanelli MB (2008) Kirschner wire placement in scaphoid bones using fluoroscopic navigation: a cadaver study comparing conventional techniques with navigation. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 4(2):165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maleike D, Nolden M, Meinzer HP, Wolf I (2009) Interactive segmentation framework of the medical imaging interaction toolkit. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 96(1):72–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Meermans G, Verstreken F (2008) Percutaneous transtrapezial fixation of acute scaphoid fractures. J Hand Surg (European Volume) 33(6):791–796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moore DC, Crisco JJ, Trafton TG, Leventhal EL (2007) A digital database of wrist bone anatomy and carpal kinematics. J Biomech 40(11):2537–2542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Myronenko A, Song X (2010) Point set registration: coherent point drift. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 32(12):2262–2275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nishihara R (2000) The dilemmas of a scaphoid fracture: a difficult diagnosis for primary care physicians. Hosp Physician 36(3):24–42

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rasoulian A, Rohling R, Abolmaesumi P (2013) Lumbar spine segmentation using a statistical multi-vertebrae anatomical shape+ pose model. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 32(10):1890–1900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rhemrev SJ, Ootes D, Beeres FJ, Meylaerts SA, Schipper IB (2011) Current methods of diagnosis and treatment of scaphoid fractures. Int J Emerg Med 4:4. doi:10.1186/1865-1380-4-4

  21. Smith EJ, Al-Sanawi HA, Gammon B, John PJS, Pichora DR, Ellis RE (2012) Volume slicing of cone-beam computed tomography images for navigation of percutaneous scaphoid fixation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 7(3):433–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tada K, Ikeda K, Okamoto S, Hachinota A, Yamamoto D, Tsuchiya H (2015) Scaphoid fracture-overview and conservative treatment. Hand Surg 20(02):204–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Trumble TE, Clarke T, Kreder HJ (1996) Non-union of the scaphoid: treatment with cannulated screws compared with treatment with herbert screws. J Bone Joint Surg 78(12):1829–1837

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emran Mohammad Abu Anas.

Additional information

We would like to thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) for funding this project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anas, E.M.A., Seitel, A., Rasoulian, A. et al. Registration of a statistical model to intraoperative ultrasound for scaphoid screw fixation. Int J CARS 11, 957–965 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1370-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1370-y

Keywords

Navigation