Skip to main content
Log in

RF-ablation pattern shaping employing switching channels of dual bipolar needle electrodes: ex vivo results

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 03 July 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

Radiofrequency (RF) ablation with mono- or bipolar electrodes is a common procedure for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a low rate of recurrence for small size tumors. For larger lesions and/or non-round/ellipsoid shapes RF ablation has some limitations and generally does not achieve comparable success rates to microwave ablation or high-intensity focused ultrasound therapies.

Materials and methods

To shape RF ablations for matching a tumor size and geometry, we have developed an electronic channel switch box for two bipolar needles that generates multiple selectable ablation patterns. The setup can be used with commercially available mono- or bipolar RF generators. The switch box provides ten selectable ablation procedures to generate different ablation patterns without a relocation of a needle. Five patterns were exemplary generated in ex vivo tissue of porcine liver and chicken breast and visually characterized.

Results

Different ablation patterns, e.g., in a L- or U-shape, were achieved. In chicken breast a maximum ablation with a diameter of \(4.3\, \hbox {cm}\) was obtained and in porcine liver \(2.8\, \hbox {cm}\) with electrodes of \(0.9\, \hbox {cm}\) length.

Conclusion

The resulting ablations with the electronic switch box and two bipolar needles show the potential ability to manage RF therapies of complex and large tumor geometries. Next steps would be to validate the actual tissue ablation volumes in further ex vivo and preclinical studies and against simulation results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 03 July 2018

    The original version of this article was published without funding note. The funding note is given below.

References

  1. Liu H, Wang Z-G, Fu S-Y, Li A-J, Pan Z-Y, Zhou W-P, Lau W-Y, Wu M-C (2016) Randomized clinical trial of chemoembolization plus radiofrequency ablation versus partial hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria. Br J Surg 103:348–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Potretzke TA, Ziemlewicz TJ, Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG, Wells SA, Brace CL, Agarwal P, Lee FT (2016) Microwave versus radiofrequency ablation treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: a comparison of efficacy at a single center. J Vasc Interv Radiol 27:631–638

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuenzli BM, Abitabile P, Maurer CA (2011) Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors: actual limitations and potential solutions in the future. World J Hepatol 3:8–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Proschek D, Tonak M, Zangos S, Mack M, Kurth A (2012) Radiofrequency ablation in experimental bone metastases using a controlled and navigated ablation device. J Bone Oncol 1:63–66

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mulier S, Jiang Y, Wang C, Jamart J, Marchal G, Michel L, Ni Y (2012) Bipolar radiofrequency ablation with four electrodes: ex vivo liver experiments and finite element method analysis. Influence of inter-electrode distance on coagulation size and geometry. Int J Hyperth 28:686–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wong K-P, Lang BH-H (2013) Use of radiofrequency ablation in benign thyroid nodules: a literature review and updates. Int J Endocrinol 2013, Article ID 428363

  7. Goldberg SN (2001) Radiofrequency tumor ablation: principles and techniques. Eur J Ultrasound 13:129–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Strasberg S, Linehan D (2003) Radiofrequency ablation of liver tumors. Curr Probl Surg 40:459–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Minami Y, Kudo M (2011) Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma: a literature review. International J Hepatol 2011, Article ID 104685

  10. Minami Y, Kudo M (2013) radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a literature review. Gut Liver 7(1):1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferras LL, Ford NJ, Morgado ML, Nobrega JM, Rebelo MS (2015) Fractional Pennes bioheat equation: theoretical and numerical studies. Fract Calc Appl Anal 18:1080–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Facciorusso A, Serviddio G, Muscatiello N (2016) Local ablative treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated review. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 7:477

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG, Ziemlewicz TJ, Lee FT Jr, Brace CL (2014) Percutaneous tumor ablation tools: microwave, radiofrequency, or cryoablation what should you use and why? Radiogr Radiolog Soc N Am 34:1344–1362

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rathke H, Hamm B, Gttler F, Rathke J, Rump J, Teichgrber U, de Bucourt M (2014) Comparison of four radiofrequency ablation systems at two target volumes in an ex vivo bovine liver model. Diagn Interv Radiol 20:251

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bitsch RG, Duex M, Helmberger T, Lubienski A (2006) Effects of vascular perfusion on coagulation size in radiofrequency ablation of ex vivo perfused bovine livers. Invest Radiol 41:422–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mikhail AS, Negussie AH, Graham C, Mathew M, Wood BJ, Partanen A (2016) Evaluation of a tissue-mimicking thermochromic phantom for radiofrequency ablation. Med Phys 43:4304–4311

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Negussie AH, Partanen A, Mikhail AS, Xu S, Abi-Jaoudeh N, Maruvada S, Wood BJ (2016) Thermochromic tissue-mimicking phantom for optimisation of thermal tumour ablation. Int J Hyperth 32:239–243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Audigier C, Mansi T, Delingette H, Rapaka S, Mihalef V, Carnegie D, Boctor EM, Choti M, Kamen A, Ayache N, Comaniciu D (2015) Efficient lattice Boltzmann solver for patient-specific radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 34:1576–1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim Y, Audigier C, Dillow A, Cheng A, Boctor EM (2017) Speed of sound estimation for thermal monitoring using an active ultrasound element during liver ablation therapy (conference presentation). Medical imaging 2017: ultrasonic imaging and tomography. In Proceedings 10139:101390F

Download references

Acknowledgements

Equipment for this study was partly provided by the Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH of the Olympus Surgical Technologies Europe.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens Ziegle.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. This article does not contain patient data.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ziegle, J., Audigier, C., Krug, J. et al. RF-ablation pattern shaping employing switching channels of dual bipolar needle electrodes: ex vivo results. Int J CARS 13, 905–916 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1769-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1769-8

Keywords

Navigation