Abstract
For the problem of scheduling n-jobs on one-machine with agreeable job release dates and due dates to minimize the number of late jobs, Kise, Ibaraki and Mine (Oper. Res. 26:121–126, 1978) gave an O(n 2)-time algorithm and proved its optimality by four lemmas. Li et al. (Oper. Res. 58:508–509, 2010) gave a counter-example to show that one lemma is invalid in some case and therefore the optimality is also invalid. In this paper, we revise the lemma and prove that the algorithm is still valid.
References
Brucker P.: Scheduling Algorithms (Fifth Edition). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2006)
Brucker, P., Knust, S.: Complexity results for scheduling problems. http://www.mathematik.uni-osnabrueck.de/research/OR/class (2010)
Kise H., Ibaraki T., Mine H.: A solvable case of the one-machine scheduling problem with ready and due times. Oper. Res. 26, 121–126 (1978)
Li S.-L., Chen Z.-L., Tang G.-C.: A note on the optimality proof of the Kise–Ibaraki–Mine algorithm. Oper. Res. 58, 508–509 (2010)
Pardalos, P.M. (eds): Complexity in Numerical Optimization. World Scientific, Singapore (1993)
Pardalos, P.M., Resende, M.G.C. (eds): Handbook of Applied Optimization. Oxford University Press, New York (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fan, B., Sun, Y., Chen, R. et al. A revised proof of the optimality for the Kise–Ibaraki–Mine algorithm. Optim Lett 6, 1951–1955 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-011-0373-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-011-0373-4